Pollack edit

Did you add that material uncited? If so, cite your references. If not, the person who added that information is in my opinion responsible for the citation. This is an encyclopaedia not Show and Tell time in Kindergarten. Items have to be sourced BEFORE adding them not add them then source them later, speaking of lazy. Solidzz (talk) 12:29, 9 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Please do not remove entirely valid material from articles merely on the grounds that it is not cited. The material you removed from Pollock was entirely valid. If you have good reason to believe that a statement like this is incorrect, then you could remove it, perhaps with an explanation on the talk page. Instead you removed valid material with no explanation of grounds for believing it is incorrect. Instead you could have done some work and researched the matter. There are hundreds of reliable sources on the web supporting the assertion. Or if you prefer a lazy approach, you could add a {{cn}} tag. --Epipelagic (talk) 00:08, 6 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Welcome! edit

 
Some cookies to welcome you!  

Welcome to Wikipedia, Solidzz! Thank you for your contributions. I am GeorgeLouis and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! GeorgeLouis (talk) 16:57, 5 July 2013 (UTC)Reply