April 2016

edit

{{OTRS pending}}Soheil1369Soheil1369 (talk) 11:50, 19 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

(talk) 11:47, 19 April 2016 (UTC) 

Your addition to Soft Technology has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. McGeddon (talk) 11:39, 19 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm McGeddon. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 11:48, 19 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

I've rewritten the text, so the article is no longer using your blog text verbatim. Either way, though, you should not be linking to your own blog in a Wikipedia article - blogs are not reliable sources and you have a conflict of interest. --McGeddon (talk) 12:05, 19 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Soft technology. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 12:10, 19 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

OTRS pending tag

edit
  • Hi Soheil1369, I have commented out an {{OTRS pending}} tag on your talk page. These tags need to be placed on the file page or article talk page (including the talk page of draft articles) - NOT on your talk page. If there is a deleted item for which permission has been submitted to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, you can ask at WP:OTRSN for someone to look for the email and restore the article if they can find it. --B (talk) 01:35, 16 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Soft technology

edit
 

The article Soft technology has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Vague and unexplained WP:NEO from an editor who was here for two hours in April and never came back.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. McGeddon (talk) 19:21, 2 June 2016 (UTC)Reply