August 2020 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in BBC Online, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. — Yours, Berrely • TalkContribs 21:16, 14 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for September 1 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mounteagle transmitting station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MFR. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 1 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Please use an edit summary edit

  Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed a recent edit you made does not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits a summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing →   Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! — Trey Maturin has spoken 19:56, 22 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:45, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

December 2022 ... "Socialist"? edit

  Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Trafford09 (talk) 11:39, 26 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

I find you a curious user in that, whilst your edits are kosher and appear to improve the coverage of radio stations, you repeatedly ignore other editors' requests for you to follow this guideline.

You have a high edit count; this means that all your edits can and do cause other editors to question why you almost never (< 1%) use Edit Summaries (ESs). So, aren't you rather a nuisance, however good?

Socialist - I assume you have an interest in politics. If so, then no doubt you believe in people pulling together, to improve everybody's lives? Then surely fellow social thinkers would be impressed more, if you were to follow guidelines, to help the product improve whilst showing a modicum of collaboration?

BTW, maybe these may interest you: Wikipedia:WikiProject_Council/Directory/Culture#Radio? Within that list, for example, you will see Portal:Radio and Wikipedia:WikiProject_Radio/UK_Radio.

I dare say you know how to talk to other users? And yet, I don't see that you have ever done so, on this account. Would you care to comment on any of the matters raised? Please feel free, for example, to edit this section, and insert a line with you thoughts. I'll notice if/when you do. You may like me to reply then?

As we say, be bold ... yet considerate, pretty please! Trafford09 (talk) 12:20, 26 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for March 21 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited KL.FM 96.7, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page West Norfolk.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 21 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

April 2023 edit

  Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Flip Format (talk) 18:59, 16 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Signal 2, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. There is a 2021 RfC where the community consensus was that these pages remain at their pre-GHR names to preserve the history of the stations. Individual GHR transmitters do not need their own Wikipedia articles. Please read this and stop changing the text of these articles to reflect GHR rebranding. Flip Format (talk) 08:05, 17 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

999 AM moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, 999 AM, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 13:13, 20 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Heart (radio network) edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Heart (radio network), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 05:56, 27 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

May 2023 edit

  Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Flip Format (talk) 15:16, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Heart (radio network) edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Heart (radio network), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:27, 11 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Smooth Radio (2014) edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Smooth Radio (2014), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 10:52, 26 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Updating references edit

When you update referenced content as you just did at Southampton, please update the access-date parameter on the given reference to confirm that you have checked the reference on which the new figures are based. It saves other people reverting your edits as unreferenced, which is what I nearly did. Thanks in advance. 10mmsocket (talk) 09:35, 4 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Lincs FM edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Lincs FM, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 10:46, 16 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:999 AM edit

  Hello, Socialist Distancing. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:999 AM, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:01, 20 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:999 AM edit

 

Hello, Socialist Distancing. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "999 AM".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 03:19, 20 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Clyde 1 edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Clyde 1, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:14, 29 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Clyde 1 edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Clyde 1, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL" error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:14, 29 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Viking FM edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Viking FM, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 11:08, 21 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on 102.0 FM edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 102.0 FM, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 11:36, 21 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started edit

Hi Socialist Distancing. Thank you for your work on 103.6 FM. Another editor, Broc, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for creating the page. Please source it appropriately, using inline references.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Broc}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Broc (talk) 15:27, 1 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve 104.2 FM edit

Hello, Socialist Distancing,

Thank you for creating 104.2 FM.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please add references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Broc}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Broc (talk) 15:29, 1 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve 99.8 FM edit

Hello, Socialist Distancing,

Thank you for creating 99.8 FM.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please add sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Broc}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Broc (talk) 15:31, 1 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

963 AM moved to draftspace edit

Thanks for your contributions to 963 AM. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. FuzzyMagma (talk) 18:53, 2 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

1296 AM moved to draftspace edit

Thanks for your contributions to 1296 AM. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. FuzzyMagma (talk) 18:53, 2 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

774 AM moved to draftspace edit

Thanks for your contributions to 774 AM. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. FuzzyMagma (talk) 18:54, 2 May 2024 (UTC)Reply