Social Science Lover

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sekhar Bandyopadhyay (June 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HenryTemplo was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sekhar Bandyopadhyay and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sekhar Bandyopadhyay, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

HenryTemplo (talk) 14:01, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Dear Henry Templo,

I have now edited the draft Sekhar Bandyopadhyay, as per your comments. Looking forward to the review of the draft.

Best Wishes,

Sucharita Social Science Lover (talk) 07:26, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello, @Social Science Lover, just some more feedback, you might want to review Wikipedia's Manual of Style (WP:MOS). It outlines how articles should be structured amongst many other things, as currently, the draft is a bit haphazard in its layout. Happy editing! HenryTemplo (talk) 09:42, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Dear Henry Templo,

Thank you so much for your feedback. It has helped me so much in editing my article. I have now re-edited the article, in the light of your feedback as well as after consulting the Wikipedia Manual Style. I have also referred to existing Wikipedia Pages and have also linked them [wherever applicable] to the page I have created.

I am very keen on publishing this page and I am also happy to make any further edits as many be necessary for the article to conform to the Wikipedia format. Looking forward to the review.

Once again, please accept my gratitude for your assistance and valuable feedback.

Best Wishes,

Social Science Lover Social Science Lover (talk) 12:28, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for your kind words! The draft looks a lot better now, well done! Now, we just need to make sure that the subject is notable. In this case, I would make sure that the subject passes WP:NACADEMIC, to demonstrate that the subject is notable under Wikipedia's guidelines. As I would not consider myself an expert on Indian Academia (or any academia for that matter) I will leave the draft to be reviewed by another editor for now (although I am somewhat confident the draft could pass). Have a great day and happy editing! HenryTemplo (talk) 14:39, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Dear Henry Templo,

Thank you so much for your kind response. So good to know that the revised draft is good.

The subject of this article is one of the most influential and well-known historians of modern India. I have myself checked the WP:NACADEMIC and have found the subject fulfilling the criteria.

But I am happy for the draft to be reviewed by an Indian/Academic expert. I am also happy to make any further revisions, if required. I have been fortunate to have received your quick response and feedback. I wished to get an idea regarding how long it may take for the academic expert to send the feedback. Subsequently, could I expect the draft to be published soon?

Looking forward to your response.

Best Wishes,

Social Science Lover Social Science Lover (talk) 23:23, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello, in response for your question, for draft could be reviewed in 4 hours or 4 months, as all reviews are generally done in random order. If you want, you could tag the draft talk pages with WikiProjects, which might speed the process up, but I see you've already done that! If you have anymore questions, feel free to ask, and happy editing! HenryTemplo (talk) 07:09, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello Henry Templo,

Thank you so much for your message.

I was wondering if the process could be expedited. The draft has already passed your review, and there is absolutely no question, I understand, about the subject of my Wikipedia article not being notable. The subject of my article, as I said earlier, is one of the most influential and famous historians of modern India. He clearly fulfils the criteria listed in WP:NACADEMIC.

Is there a way I could place a request to speed up the remainder of the process.

Looking forward to your kind assistance and cooperation.

Best Wishes,

Social Science Lover. Social Science Lover (talk) 09:57, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

My best advice, if you (really) want a review done quickly, I would recommend asking the relevant WikiProject if they would be willing to give some feedback and/or a review, as the WikiProject members may have a better idea on the notability (I'm only somewhat confident the subject is notable, due to my mentioned unfamiliarity with academia) , although there's no guarantee anyone will review it. Some WikiProjects are more active then others, while some editors don't review drafts on request as a matter of principle. Regardless, have a great day! HenryTemplo (talk) 10:06, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi Henry Temple,

How should I do that? Should I tag the project? Social Science Lover (talk) 10:59, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

While I would generally recommend simply being patient during the review process, but to bring the draft to the attention of a WikiProject, post a message on their project talk page requesting some feedback and (potentially) a review. Have a good day! HenryTemplo (talk) 12:39, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Social Science Lover! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! HenryTemplo (talk) 14:01, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Help me!

Please help me with... I am a newcomer and have recently created a page [1]. The subject is one of the most eminent and influential historians of modern India. He clearly fulfils all the criteria of notability, as per the Wikipedia guidelines. The article has already passed the initial review and now only requires an academic expert to look at it. I wished to earnestly request you to kindly expedite the remainder of the review process.

Looking forward to your kind cooperation. Social Science Lover (talk) 10:55, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

The {{help me}} template should not be used to expedite the AFC review process. Your draft has been submitted for review, so please be patient while it is pending. If you want more help, change the {{help me-helped}} back into a {{help me}}, stop by the Teahouse, or Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Primefac (talk) 11:07, 16 June 2022 (UTC)