User talk:Soaper1234/Archive 3

Latest comment: 8 years ago by AnemoneProjectors in topic A barnstar for you!

Your submission at Articles for creation: Les Coker (January 23)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CraigyDavi was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. —CraigyDavi (TC@) 21:43, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Ways to improve Harry Reid (actor)

Hi, I'm Ironholds. Soaper1234, thanks for creating Harry Reid (actor)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please address the tags on this article. Thanks!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Ironholds (talk) 03:01, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

  The Special Barnstar
Thanks for the major update on List of Waterloo Road characters, Your effort and hardwork hasn't gone unnoticed :),

Keep up the great :), –Davey2010Talk 23:35, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Danny-Boy Hatchard for deletion

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Danny-Boy Hatchard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danny-Boy Hatchard until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. 5 albert square (talk) 22:18, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Homes for EastEnders characters

Hi, please can you not add home addresses for any EastEnders characters. We stopped listing these several years ago because it is in-universe information, and characters move around a lot. The infobox should contain only the most relevant information, and the address of a character is barely important to understand the character. Additionally, listing the address a character lives at in the most recent episodes ignores the fact that they live in different addresses throughout their time in the show, and the infobox should reflect the character's entire time in the series. Thanks. –anemoneprojectors– 18:31, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

List of Casualty characters

Hello, I have realised that you have removed Lisa Duffin from the impending characters as you put "Need better source" but since when was it up to you what source other people use, she is a returning character & that is the only source we have which means I will be putting it back on there as she also features in the summer trailer. Dannysage96 (talk) 07:37, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi there Danny, I did remove it as the article did not provide a valid source either. The article just states "Duffy will be returning to our screens but it is unknown for how long, she makes her re-appearance on 29th August." and the history of the character. Having checked the trailer, there was no appearance of Duffy in that either. There was no real evidence and as you have pointed out, there are no other sources that point to this being true. As soon as we receive another source that reveals that Duffy is returning, we add her back. Soaper1234 (talk) 11:03, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I know it is true she is returning as I run the website it was on & waiting for a reply from the BBC to find out how long for - if you check this picture out what someone posted on Twitter they have circled where Duffy is in the Trailer:- https://twitter.com/Soap_loverxx/status/631803066715668480 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dannysage96 (talkcontribs) 11:30, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Thank you Danny. I am aware you run the website and I read the website myself. The link you have provided there is a valid reference. It was purely because there was no solid evidence in the article. Thanks again, Soaper1234 (talk) 11:35, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

I have just looked back onto the page of the list of characters and see you have once again removed Lisa "Duffy" Duffin from returning, also when I added the reference again it was because it is now updated otherwise I wouldn't have put it back on again, I now states on the bottom of that article they she is in a couple of episodes. Dannysage96 (talk) 17:01, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Les Coker

 

Hello, Soaper1234. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Les Coker".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13. An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. RichT|C|E-Mail 22:41, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tim Metcalfe (Coronation Street) has been accepted

 
Tim Metcalfe (Coronation Street), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 19:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

A page you started (Stan Carter) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Stan Carter, Soaper1234!

Wikipedia editor 5 albert square just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for putting in the time and effort to create this!

To reply, leave a comment on 5 albert square's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Hi, just FYI I moved the page from Stan Carter (EastEnders) to Stan Carter. Stan Carter was only a redirect before, he's the only Stan Carter on Wikipedia so should be under this per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC :)--5 albert square (talk) 01:27, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

  The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
This is to say a massive thanks for all the hard work you have done and are doing, especially on Stan Carter and the lists of EastEnders episodes drafts! It seems like quite a while since EastEnders articles has such a good editor. So please keep up the amazing work. AnemoneProjectors 09:53, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Thank you that AnemoneProjectors, what a way to end 2015. Soaper1234 (talk) 15:03, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Indeed! Here's to a productive 2016 :-) AnemoneProjectors 19:24, 2 January 2016 (UTC)