User talk:SoMayer/sandbox

Quoted Material

The Coren SearchBot has identified material that was reprinted in Al-Ahram (at: http://english.ahram.org.eg/NewsContentPrint/5/0/173564/Arts--Culture/0/INTERVIEW-Filming-Revolution,-an-interactive-websi.aspx) from its first appearance in Jadaliyyah, which is referenced in the article. ~~Sophiemayer~~

Renaming: Assistance needed

This article should be titled Filming Revolution as the website is an authored work: could I have some help renaming it to capitalise the R? Thank you!~~Sophiemayer~~

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because the website it refers to a) contains original material (i.e. it is a documentary film databased online; b) it connects both to historical events of significance, and other significant works about them (The Square, for example); c) it will be the subject of scholarly and critical attention over the next year --~~sophiemayer~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sophiemayer (talk • contribs) 21:33, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Please read WP:N regarding notability. The subject needs reliable secondary sources. In other words, RELIABLE sources (that are not associated with the subject of the article) would need to have substantial content relating to the subject. The reasons you've stated do not establish Notability, even if true. - superβεεcat  21:55, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks Superbeecat. I think WP:TOOSOON is a good judgement call. Will sandbox and await further verifiable sources and independent publication.Sophiemayer (talk) 13:29, 22 January 2016 (UTC)Sophiemayer — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sophiemayer (talk • contribs) 13:24, 22 January 2016 (UTC)