Image copyright problem with Image:SaintAnthonysView.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:SaintAnthonysView.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 05:06, 1 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Czechoslovak Liberty Bell edit

Your contribution to the Meneely Bell Foundry article is an interesting addition but needed considerable editing to bring it up to Wiki standards. Sourcing is totally absent, something you should address immediately. Some of the claims are very specific about individuals and shouldn't remain online without sources to prove them. The article expresses tones and points of view that are inappropriate in an encyclopedia. Some of the details wandered away from the topic at hand and were not appropriate for this article, such as the lengthy discussion of the church where the bell is now located. Such materials belong in their own article. I edited your contribution extensively and I see you have reversed my changes. I suggest that you use my editing as a baseline and add details from your original story only if you have sources to prove them and they directly pertain to the topic at hand. An article about the church itself would be a good idea. I also noticed that there is no article on Prague 7 yet. --Pat (talk) 16:19, 1 May 2008 (UTC)Reply