Smgooneratne

Hi, welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for removing some of the external links form Nalaka Godahewa, my main concern was the embedded external links in the text as these are not in line with the manual of style, although the external links section was far too long. I noticed someone else has removed all the rest of the external links. I think that might be overkill, you could probable put a couple (2 or 3) appropriate and relevant links back into the external links section. However, I would advise you to read the following guidelines first so you have a better idea of what can be added:

• Embedded citations
• External links
• Manual of style - External links

If you have any concerns or questions about the article you can post them on the article talk page. If you have any problems you can ask on my talk page or ask here by placing {{help me}} followed by your question. Regards Sarahj2107 (talk) 11:38, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

SMGOONERATNE

Hi this is regarding your note about 'Nalaka Godahewa' page.The page has improved a lot now and thank you for your valuable advice all throughout . I noticed your earler comment and removed some external links( about 10) but kept balance. I also attached messege for you asking you to consider removing your comment. later I noticed that the comment has been taken off and I was very happy. But a day later I also noticed that remaining external links ( about 15) were also gone. I thought it was done by you but having seen your messege to me I understand that some one else has removed them. Any way shall we leave it as it is now without further comments. Several people in our country have been contributing and we all like it to see it remaining a nice page as it is now, without any further comments. However as per your suggestion I will look for about external 3-4 links o be added later on. Thank you very much. SM

Hello, Smgooneratne. You have new messages at Sarahj2107's talk page.
Message added 12:28, 16 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Possibly unfree File:Nalakafromgoogle.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nalakafromgoogle.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 01:42, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Nalakafromgoogle.png

A tag has been placed on File:Nalakafromgoogle.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 01:44, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:AtUNWTO2012.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:AtUNWTO2012.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mlpearc (powwow) 05:30, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Nalaka Godahewa may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• out that the company concerned has issued a press release denying all allegations.<ref>Daily FT :(Print edition 31st July 2013 [http://www.ft.lk/2013/07/31/krrish-deals-no-formal-complaint-yet-

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:35, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Atunwto2012.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Atunwto2012.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. obi2canibe^{talk contr} 10:01, 20 June 2015 (UTC)