SmartScience

SmartScience, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi SmartScience! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Hyperloop Transportation Technologies

Hello SS, I read your edits to HTT and Hyperloop. My personal assessment is that you are completely correct. For all the best reasons, you question the hyperbolic assertions that hyperloop is new and successful. In the world of Wikipedia, that qualifies as WP:Synthesis. You'll need to find a press report that supports your sensible analysis. The problem is that until the public is asked to contribute money, most of what you'll read is the breathless reporting of sycophants. It's no fun to write a disparaging article about a speculative technology. I took a different tack, which was not reversed. I listed the promises HTT has made along with the projected dates. HTT, in particular, is a scam whose longevity astounds me. They make an animation or plywood mockup and call it success. Then they traipse around the world signing letters of intent that have no teeth. For the two principals and their PR agent, it's a career.

The alternate view of this industry is that it has a marketing approach that simply promises revolution rather than evolutionary development. All of their design elements are inevitable, just not simultaneously. Sure, subways will get better, but telling people that speeds will increase three percent per year is not near as exciting as a leap to trans-sonic speeds. It's simply a marketing tactic, not an engineering strategy. The public buys this science fiction. It is as much gaslighting as climate change denial. Rhadow (talk) 13:17, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Quarter Circle A Ranch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Russell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:58, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Properly describing marriage, divorce, remarriage, 2nd divorce, and new marriage.

Hello! In the info box provided for a biography, how would one designate the occurrence of two marriages of the same persons with a divorce in between and subsequent marriage to a new wife for the subject of the Wiki article? Thank you! Meanwhile, I will search wiki for possible examples such as Richard Burton/ Elizabeth Taylor and others...

See also sections

See also sections are only for links to existing Wikipedia articles, you should not be listing names in that section that are not article links. - MrOllie (talk) 00:28, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Oko Drammeh moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Oko Drammeh, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~Styyx^Talk? 00:44, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox/Oko Drammeh (September 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:SmartScience/sandbox/Oko Drammeh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:10, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Oko Drammeh has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Oko Drammeh. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:11, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Thank you, sir! I should delete the original draft, and submit this new one. The original was a mistake. A relatives todler playing with the computer 'submitted' the previous. It was a beginning with no references, nor had it been coded for format. This new one is complete. I appreciate your efforts. SmartScience (talk) 05:54, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oko Drammeh (November 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Star Mississippi was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Oko Drammeh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Star Mississippi 21:19, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Oko Drammeh

Hello, SmartScience. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Oko Drammeh, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:45, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Oko Drammeh

Hello, SmartScience. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Oko Drammeh".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:35, 3 May 2023 (UTC)