Your submission at Articles for creation: Hanim Sultan (June 17)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Flemmish Nietzsche was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 16:15, 17 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Sm Siam Islam! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 16:15, 17 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Coffee Plant (June 18)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:06, 18 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hanim Sultan (June 18)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 08:23, 18 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Bridge at Argenteuil (June 19)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Qcne (talk) 11:32, 19 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Sm Siam Islam all three of your drafts have been declined due to improper referencing (circular sourcing) and both this one and the Coffee Plant are essays.
Please read up on our policies and guidelines before you create any further drafts - I do not want you to waste your time creating drafts that are not suitable for Wikipedia. Qcne (talk) 11:33, 19 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

June 2024

edit

  Please refrain from attempting to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been disallowed by an edit filter. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeatedly attempting to perform disruptive actions may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Renewal6 (talk) 10:27, 20 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Roxelana, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Roxelana was changed by Sm Siam Islam (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.971281 on 2024-06-20T11:09:22+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:09, 20 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet

edit
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Siam hossain official per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Siam hossain official. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Girth Summit (blether) 13:42, 20 June 2024 (UTC)Reply