Speedy deletion nomination of Mark Barrenechea

edit
 

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on Mark Barrenechea requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you can assert the notability of the subject,  . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 23:42, 9 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Silicon Graphics International

edit

Please don't copy and paste text from other sites to Wikipedia. Please make sure that all of your edits are in your own words. In addition, you removed information from the article which had sources and replaced it with "ad-speak". The Mark of the Beast (talk) 23:43, 9 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: TouchCommerce (January 20)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. Onel5969 (talk) 15:23, 20 January 2015 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Slonsky, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 (talk) 15:23, 20 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: TouchCommerce (May 14)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Adyoo3 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Adyoo3 (talk) 04:04, 14 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hiya. These are the reasons why I decline your article. More reliable sources from third party that talk about the company rather than just report the honors it received. How the company contributed to the world in general. Wall Street journal is an example. Writing an article in your own words is important, I see you have made a good effort. Please keep working on your article and once you have solved the problems feel free to resubmit it. I myself have had to reedit my articles that have been declined. It's a learning process, please do not be discouraged. Thank you. Adyoo3 (talk) 18:43, 14 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: TouchCommerce (July 21)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Fiddle Faddle 19:20, 21 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Draft:TouchCommerce concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:TouchCommerce, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:16, 2 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:TouchCommerce

edit
 

Hello, Slonsky. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "TouchCommerce".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Anonymouspoutateoh (talk) 09:41, 25 February 2016 (UTC)Reply