Skt5780

July 2019

Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Om Namah Shivaya have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 16:54, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Tulsidas. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:38, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

August 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Annapurna (goddess), you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 15:50, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Abecedare (talk) 17:13, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Skt5780 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am just giving the external link for relevnets knowledge. If it violets the rules and regulation of wikipedia then I sorry for that. Please unblock me. I assure you after unblocking I only give relevent information to improve wiki. Skt5780 (talk) 15:11, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This unblock request is almost incoherent. Regardless, as you see nothing wrong with your edits, there are no grounds to consider lifting the block. Yamla (talk) 15:32, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Skt5780 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am really vary sorry to break the rule of wiki. If my account become unblocked then I really assure you that I give contribution to improve wiki. I am doing research on Hinduism. And I am publishing blog post on Hinduism. So I request you to kindly unblock my account. I assured you I never do those mistake I do previously. Skt5780 (talk) 15:39, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

It is difficult to read this request. If English is not your primary language, you may feel more comfortable editing the version of Wikipedia in your primary language. A certain level of skill in English is required to be able to contribute here. Regardless, you will need to explain what was wrong with your edits and how you will change in the future. As this request does not do that, I am declining it. 331dot (talk) 15:44, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

•  Administrator note Skt570, as the blocking admin, i'd be willing to unblock you as long as you acknowledge that you have read wikipedia's policies on conflict of interest, reliable sourcing and external links and that you intend to follow them from hereon (in particular, by not adding links in mainspace to any blog/website that you are associated with). Let me know if you are ok with that. Abecedare (talk) 15:49, 20 August 2019 (UTC)