Skt34
| This is Skt34's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Ahsan Khalil (August 28)
edit
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ahsan Khalil and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, Skt34!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Maliner (talk) 10:03, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
|
- Sir, I didn't submit this for review. I'm working on it right now. Skt34 (talk) 06:06, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Ahsan Khalil has a new comment
edit
Managing a conflict of interest
edit
Hello, Skt34. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
- avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
- propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
- disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
- avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
- do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Maliner (talk) 17:00, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Ahsan Khalil for deletion
edit
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahsan Khalil until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Speedy deletion nomination of Ahsan Khalil
edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Ahsan Khalil requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Maliner (talk) 04:01, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
Alisha Parveen moved to draftspace
editThanks for your contributions to Alisha Parveen. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability and fails entertainers lacks significant coverage from reliable sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 04:24, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
Deletion discussion about Alisha Parveen
editHello Skt34, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Alisha Parveen, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alisha Parveen.
Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|C1K98V}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
November 2023
editThe Page {{Romaisa Khan}} You have created.Can you explain that in which Device from mobile or computer you have created this Page.And tell us further more that the article {{Romaisa Khan}} , how this article approved or you have not posted it for a review because Submission AFC have not found when you create page. N.edits335 (talk) 15:45, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
- The page is was Romaisa Khan. N.edits335 (talk) 15:46, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
- N.edits335 (talk) What you have to do by knowing it. You can tell me so I can help you.
Blocked for sockpuppetry
edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:53, 20 December 2023 (UTC)Unblocking Request
edit
Skt34 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Sir! I really want to contribute to Wikipedia. After blocking, I read carefully about multiple accounts and their use. I had mistake and used my account against the Wikipedia policies. I will be take care next time. I will use this account only according to Wikipedia polices. Kindly unblock me, i want to work with Wikipedia and if I do it again, you will ban me forever. If you have any query or question please feel free to ask. Skt34 (talk) 06:11, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You don't discuss what contributions you wish to make, nor explain why we should trust that you won't abuse multiple accounts again. We don't need you to tell us you would accept another block(whether you do or not is immaterial), we just need you to address what led to this block. 331dot (talk) 09:52, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- 331dot (talk) Sir! I have keen interest in Islamic related Organizations, movements and aslo in military related topics. You may also seen that I worked on organizations and military related articles. Unfortunately, i missed used my account against Wikipedia policy. If will be unblock and allowed to contribute to Wikipedia , I will work on islam and military related articles to improve them and remove their issues according to their tags. I will also create new articles on same topics which are notable to pass general notability guidelines. Skt34 (talk) 19:08, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
- You may make a new request for someone else to review; my review above puts an end to my involvement here. 331dot (talk) 19:15, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
- Sir can you please help me to get out of it. Skt34 (talk) 19:19, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
- You may make a new request for someone else to review; my review above puts an end to my involvement here. 331dot (talk) 19:15, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
- 331dot (talk) Sir my 2nd unblock request is still under review. What should I do??. Kindly help and guide me. Skt34 (talk) 07:07, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- You should wait until someone reviews it. There are a limited number of volunteers who review unblock requests, and there are many dozens that have been waiting longer than you. Please be patient. 331dot (talk) 08:50, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Unblock Request
edit Skt34 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have keen interest in Islamic related Organizations, movements and aslo in military related topics. You may also seen that I worked on organizations and military related articles. Unfortunately, i missed used my account against Wikipedia policy. If I will be unblock and allowed to contribute to Wikipedia , I will work on islam and military related articles to improve them and remove their issues according to their tags. I will also create new articles on same topics which are notable to pass general notability guidelines. And I will work hard to abide by your policies and to further read, understand and follow these restrictions.Skt34 (talk) 19:20, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I'm not too keen on unblocking someone who was using multiple socks to votestack deletion discussions just a few weeks ago. The standard offer is probably your best bet. You also haven't addressed the issue of whether or not you have a conflict of interest with the subjects you've edited about. Spicy (talk) 23:24, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Skt34 (talk) 19:20, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
- Hello, Skt34,
- Can you be specific about how you misused your "account against Wikipedia policy"? Unblocking partially is based on faith that you will not make the same mistakes but it has to be clear that you know what you did incorrectly. If you had multiple accounts, please list them here. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 00:13, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Ahsan Khalil
edit If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Ahsan Khalil requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Liz Read! Talk! 00:16, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- Sir, there is 3 to 4 more reliable sources about authors's books. I am blocked so I am not be able to add them. Kindly restore it so i can add them. Skt34 (talk) 17:45, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Romaisa Khan for deletion
edit The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Romaisa Khan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.