August 2009

edit

  Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Kuvempu University, as minor if (and only if) they genuinely are minor edits (see Help:Minor edit). Marking a major change as a minor one is considered poor etiquette. The rule of thumb is that only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearranging of text without modifying content should be flagged as a 'minor edit.' Thank you. Hi Rock5410, I see you're evading your block under a new name again. As long as you're making constructive changes, I'm happy to see this new name as a way to start fresh and make good contributions. But please don't mark everything as minor--very few of your edits really qualify. If you could use edit summaries, that would also help others understand your changes. You really are improving in the contributions you're making, and I appreciate that you are trying to do better. Not marking as minor is another thing you can do to improve. WeisheitSuchen (talk) 11:13, 6 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

CC licenses on Flickr images

edit

I see that you uploaded several images from Flickr for NIIT. Unfortunately, it looks like every single one of those needs to be removed. Not all CC licenses are compatible with Wikipedia. For example, this image of NIIT Atlanta is licensed for non-commercial use only. Because Wikipedia content is reused by many commercial interests, that image isn't acceptable here. Some of the other images you uploaded, like this one is actually under full copyright and not under any CC license. See how it says "All Rights Reserved" and has the C in a circle? Just because it's on Flickr doesn't mean it's acceptable for Wikipedia. You have to be really careful about which license was used. The only ones that are compatible are CC-By (Attribution only) and CC-By-SA (Attribution Share Alike). You marked images as having those images as having those licenses, but that isn't true. For NIIT, try this search. In Flickr's Advanced Search settings, make sure you check all three boxes: "Only search within Creative Commons-licensed content," "Find content to use commercially," and "Find content to modify, adapt, or build upon."

So how do you want to handle this? Will you take down these images yourself, or do I need to go through and formally submit them for deletion? I'd prefer that you remove them yourself so we can do this amicably. WeisheitSuchen (talk) 16:40, 9 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Every single one of them is done improperly. You claimed a photo is a logo, when clearly that's false. You left the image of the expo in even though it's clearly copyrighted. Taking out two of them isn't enough; that tells me you just want to play the same games that have gotten you blocked in the past. Show me that you're trying to do it right by taking them all out. WeisheitSuchen (talk) 18:45, 9 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
You're still playing games. This one has the exact same problems, and I specifically mentioned it on the article talk page. Yet you left it in the article. When I said "every single one of them," it wasn't a joke. Here's the deal: I've explained copyright to you numerous times. I've now run out of ways to explain it. If you can't understand it with all the explanations from me and Polly and Dougweller and everyone else, I don't think we can get past the language barrier. So you have a couple of choices. One option is that you could go back to your usual routine of making threats because things aren't going your way. You've seen how well that's worked out for you in the past, but you've done it three times and I expect you'll probably do it again. You've convinced admins that the appropriate response is to "to convince [you] to go away." (Note that I've also been asked to report you for signing up for another named account, something I haven't done yet because I really have been trying to assume good faith in spite of your blatantly bad faith threats in the past.)
Fortunately, you have some more productive options than more threats. What I recommend first is that you simply stop adding images to Wikipedia. Like I said, if you don't understand it now, I don't think we can explain it to you any other way that will really help you understand. There's a fundamental difference here in how you view copyright and licensing (i.e., pretending you have the rights is enough) and how things legally must work on Wikipedia (i.e., we actually should have the rights and not pretend). You've also made it clear that you don't think the laws should apply to you if it's content you really want to include, and that expressed belief that you're above the law is another part of the problem. I don't think we're going to get past that, so if you want to continue to contribute to Wikipedia, it's best that you stay away from image contributions.
Rather than images, why don't you work on cleaning up the reference format in some of the articles you've worked on? NIIT in particular needs the cleanup. You could also try joining the Education in India project to have another group of people to help mentor you and give you some better direction in where your contributions can be helpful. I have been trying to help you, I just don't think I can get past that language barrier enough. I'm tired of playing games where you respond like this when I try to help you. WeisheitSuchen (talk) 09:34, 10 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
By the way, I know I could have asked you to correct the licenses on those 5 images, but based on how this conversation has been going I decided it was easiest to list them all on possibly unfree files myself. They all need to be deleted from Wikipedia, not just from that article. WeisheitSuchen (talk) 09:55, 10 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

The Hindu

edit

Please do not remove merge tags from articles when there is a discussion on the talk page, like you did here. -SpacemanSpiffCalvinHobbes 17:54, 9 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

User Subpage

edit

Did you know that you can create a private sandbox for yourself that isn't automatically deleted like the regular sandboxes? It's called a user subpage and it's fairly easy to create. I assume that some of the content you're putting on your user page is actually tests, like how to set up a gallery correctly. Obviously the claim that you took the images is false, since they were photographed by another editor. If you want to do that kind of testing without making it look like you're claiming that for yourself (or giving yourself barnstars, which is bad etiquette, or pretending you're a native speaker of English, which you clearly are not), you can set up a subpage for yourself and do all the testing you want. That's also a good place to work on drafts of article content over the course of multiple days. Let me know if you have any questions; I'll see it if you leave a message here. WeisheitSuchen (talk) 12:15, 15 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Yeah your are right i was experimenting on the user page please make it perfect. I mean it should look good for other user who wants to see my user page. And secondly how will i create a new page for experiment.--Sita manu (talk) 14:27, 15 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

I actually can't change your user page (well, technically I can, but I'm not supposed to--it's not considered polite). You're only supposed to edit your own user page. Besides, I could delete the existing content and move it to a test page, but I don't know you well enough to pick userboxes for you. The directions for creating a page for experimentation are in the user subpage link above, but basically you just edit your user page and type [[/testing]]. If you want to call it something else, just replace "testing" with the name you want. You can create multiple pages that way for different projects you're working on. You can move all the tests you've been working on there. If you want to add a few userboxes, rather than copying from someone else's page and using their information, why don't you look through this gallery of userboxes. The directions for using those boxes are on the same page. Find some that are true for you and use this as a way to let people know more about you, not just to make the page look better. WeisheitSuchen (talk) 15:50, 15 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Vandalizing

edit

Please make my page semi-protected due to high risk of vandalizing i have noticed that some people some with anonymous have edited my user page and changed a little bit. Therefore please stop from vandalizing it.--Sita manu (talk) 04:48, 20 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Your page has been edited ONCE by an IP address. You personally have made threats to vandalize more often than that. This edit wasn't even overt vandalism, just a revert to an earlier version. You could have undone the changes in one step if you'd chosen to. Here's the policy on semi-protection and the place to make such requests if you're interested in pursuing your request, but I doubt you'll convince an admin your page is at "high risk" warrants protection. WeisheitSuchen (talk) 07:42, 20 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Your recent addition to Master of Science in Information Technology has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. You took multiple sentences from here and didn't even pretend to paraphrase them and not break the law. You're back to your old illegal ways again, which forces me to start taking a look at all your newspaper contributions too. I wish you had chosen not to start stealing content again. WeisheitSuchen (talk) 13:27, 22 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Moving pages

edit

Please do not move pages to grammatically incorrect titles like you did with List of newspapers in India. -SpacemanSpiffCalvinHobbes 16:13, 22 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

 . Stop moving articles to incorrect titles, as you did with Print media in India. This is your last warning. -SpacemanSpiffCalvinHobbes 16:26, 22 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

About your request to be blocked

edit

Since you later deleted this request, does that mean you changed your mind? If you don't want to contribute to Wikipedia anymore, then simply stop doing so. You don't need to be blocked in order to stop editing here. In fact, blocking hasn't been a deterrent to you making edits anyway; you just change your name every time. After all, you've used three separate names prior to this one. Would a block make any difference this time? Why not just stop logging in or making any changes? WeisheitSuchen (talk) 17:45, 22 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image (File:Times of India logo.jpg)

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Times of India logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 06:03, 24 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image (File:TimesofIndialofo.png)

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:TimesofIndialofo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 06:03, 24 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

NPOV

edit

Could please mention what NPOV what just said in NIIT article i could't get get it i abbreaviation term. Anyway I'm back in my business, I showed my anger toward you people saying to vandalize article I'm really sorry and I apologize for my actions.--Sita manu (talk) 16:32, 25 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for the apology. Hopefully you won't do any more threats or call my any more names (like you did yesterday on my user page). Sometimes you do reasonable edits, but you seem to struggle to do only good edits without getting angry. NPOV means neutral point of view, which you had mentioned on that talk page. WeisheitSuchen (talk) 16:47, 25 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
I've been thinking about how to deal with all these issues. As I said, sometimes you seem to be doing good edits, but then you lose your temper and make threats or call me names or whatever. Frankly, I'm tired of the games and the back and forth. I've put in so much time trying to help you, and you repaid me by vandalizing my user page and calling me an asshole. So here's where we stand: the apology buys you one final chance. If you make another threat, call anyone names, vandalize any articles, or break copyright, I will report you to the administrators and request both a block on this username and rangeblocks on your IP addresses. You have to decide whether you want to contribute here or not. If you do, then you need to follow the same rules as everyone else. You've had more warnings than most users, and I'm probably an idiot for not already reporting you. But I think at some level you really do want to help, at least some days. I can't continue to spend all my time doing this crazy back and forth with you though, so I'm boycotting the drama from now on. This has been two months, and I've had it. Figure out how to get your anger under control or accept that you won't be able to continue editing Wikipedia. WeisheitSuchen (talk) 21:06, 25 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Actually your are right I quickly lose my anger and show all my frustrations towards you people because you always catch me red handed for my awful actions which completely I admit and you people always targeted me as VANDALIZING GURU. Look i always want to help and contribute articles to make it better now while doing it I intentionally and unintentionally made some serious blunders according to wikipedia's law. I admit that i targeted your user page because always catch like a thief as if i 'm vandalizing article not contributing to make articles better, from the day one that's right you WeisheitSuchen targeted me and only me as a criminal in wikipedia. Anyway I want to change my user page name can i do it because i'm keen to change my user page name.--Sita manu (talk) 16:35, 26 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Change User Name

edit

I want to change my user name from sita_manu to MikeMaster pls tell me how will i do it i have move user page to MikeMaster.--Sita manu (talk) 08:55, 3 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi Mike. In fact, you can't do that directly (I have moved your page back to Sita manu). In order to have your username correctly changed, please follow the instructions on the Changing Username page. Thanks. -- Luk talk 09:06, 3 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
I see that you have a pending request for getting the username "MikeDogma". Please chose one username, and update the request there (the bureaucrat is awaiting more explanations). -- Luk talk 09:08, 3 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Pls change to MikeDogma that would be better i gave explanation previously thereafter i don't think any further explanation is required why don't change it by yourself.--Sita manu (talk) 09:10, 3 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

I don't have the ability to do that (only bureaucrats may rename users). Well, your explanation on CHU consists of "db-user" only, which doesn't make much sense. -- Luk talk 09:55, 3 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Redirect Problem

edit

I created some redirect page in wikipedia such as TTSL which redirects Tata Teleservice or Teach India which redirects Teach For India but whenever i try to search this redirections on advanced search engine in wikipedia this redirects aren't coming at all why i don't know pls make this redirects available and which i created you can quickly see the my watchlist tab there you will find all those redirects available.--Sita manu (talk) 13:35, 4 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Multiple Usernames

edit

When you changed your name from Sita Manu to MikeDogma, the bureaucrat redirected your user and talk pages here. But once the username change happened, you didn't use it; you just recreated your old username. That means you currently have two accounts in violation of the guidelines, although at least you aren't actively using them both. If you want to go back to using Sita Manu, ask if they can change it back. At a minimum, you should have a talk page for the account you are actually using rather than giving people the runaround with multiple accounts. WeisheitSuchen (talk) 13:20, 26 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

September 2009

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but one or more redirects you created, such as with Nios, have been considered disruptive and/or malicious, and have been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. WeisheitSuchen (talk) 13:51, 28 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Article Name Problem

edit

Please change the name of NIIT article and make it as NIIT and delete National Institute of Information Technologies. I clearly mentioned about my fault and gave a brief explanation in the ip address 122.163.77.254, you can see in the discussion page of NIIT.--Sita manu (talk) 04:27, 1 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

I'm going to wait and see whether you get blocked or not before putting in any request to an admin to make that move. You've exceeded your last warning with me and you received another warning from another editor, so I don't really want to get in the middle of that process. WeisheitSuchen (talk) 11:49, 1 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

I personally request to administrator to move the National Institute of Information Technologies as NIIT since the company doesn't use the name that i had given please move the page immindiately--Sita manu (talk) 18:38, 15 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:St. Xavier's College, Kolkata.gif

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:St. Xavier's College, Kolkata.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:37, 6 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:UOHYD logo.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:UOHYD logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 04:02, 25 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:The Hindu 7-19-09.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:The Hindu 7-19-09.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 06:10, 12 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

edit

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:57, 14 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Deccan Chronicle.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Deccan Chronicle.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 04:54, 2 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Deccan Chronicle Newspaper Logo.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Deccan Chronicle Newspaper Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 04:56, 2 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Hindu Logo.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Hindu Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 04:03, 14 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:NewsPaperTheHindu.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:NewsPaperTheHindu.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:33, 16 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Kolkata Mirror for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kolkata Mirror is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kolkata Mirror until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ~ Winged BladesGodric 08:22, 7 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Kolkata Mirror logo.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Kolkata Mirror logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 17 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:Times of India lofo.png

edit
 

The file File:Times of India lofo.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 05:52, 11 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:NewsPaperTheHindu.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:NewsPaperTheHindu.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:51, 17 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:CBSE Logo.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:CBSE Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 8 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Indian Institute of Hardware Technology has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The institute no longer exist, no source on internet, no citation, defunct website

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.