Welcome

edit
Hello Sir rupert orangepeel! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Mermaid from the Baltic Sea 03:19, 22 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

King of Canada

edit

Didn't quite understand what was meant by the King of Canada comment in Washington Navy Yard article. I reverted it. Was about to leave a vandalism comment here, but it would appear you aren't one. So I will just ask instead what you intended. Thanks. Student7 (talk) 23:20, 7 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

I'm not sure about the vandalism part, but you really are going to need a good reference to sustain the "King of Canada" title in respect to this particular visit (as opposed to others, for example). Student7 (talk) 03:24, 14 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

For King of Candada, see: History of monarchy in Canada The tour is also listed as a Canadian State tour in: List_of_state_and_official_visits_by_Canada

Sir rupert orangepeel (talk) 09:18, 14 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

March 2010

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Washington Navy Yard, you will be blocked from editing. You are being purely disruptive, the title of the article is George VI of the United Kingdom, not of Canada even though he was also the monarch of Canada at the time. -MBK004 00:56, 12 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Atwill (January 29)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheAafi was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
The Aafī (talk) 10:19, 29 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Sir rupert orangepeel! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ─ The Aafī (talk) 10:19, 29 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Atwill has been accepted

edit
 
John Atwill, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Alyo (chat·edits) 17:34, 26 April 2022 (UTC)Reply