Latest comment: 18 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Other than the entry on external links that reads "UNIQ4f1498313 8725c4d-HTML CommentStrip25e4e39637 aef7eb00000004", everything looks fine. I don't understand the purpose behind that "UNIQ" code. Care to explain that?
The random jumble of text appears at the top of Asperger_syndrome#External_links in case you don't realize you put it there. To add an article to your watchlist, there is a "watch" tab to the far right of the other tabs on top of nearly every page on Wikipedia. Only registered users possess the "watch" feature; anon IP users will not see the watch tab. All you need to do is click on it and your watchlist will have that article. Alternately, you can press alt+w on the page you're reading at that moment and it'll also send that article (or userpage, and any type of page on WP) to your watchlist. --Shultz IV13:06, 31 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
Referencing
Latest comment: 18 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Hi there. I noticed your copyediting and referencing on Culture of India. However, you needed to add:
==References==
<references/>
...at the appropriate location in the article (if it isn't already there), so that it can send the references to that section and format them correctly. I've made the change to the article in question but I just wanted to let you know. Diliff | (Talk)(Contribs)13:04, 31 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
No problem, but if it is a work in progress, perhaps you could keep it as a preview until you're happy with the changes - that way there isn't a chance of someone jumping the gun. Everyone is editing in real time, remember. :) Diliff | (Talk)(Contribs)13:18, 31 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 18 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hi. I looked up this article's history and found that you have been editing this article for a while now. The article looks highly unsourced and more of original research without proper citations and sources. Could you add the citations and sources to the article? Thanks. --Nearly Headless Nick12:54, 31 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 18 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Those actually only work on my custom RC feed parser :) You can delete them if you like, though I don't remember exactly where they hide in the text. They're completely useless unless you're running the same system that I am. :) Jude (talk) 11:09, 2 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
You have to tweak them slightly :-) I can't remember exactly where I got them... Perhaps WP:JS? Anyway, you need to have templates on subpages called /Status, and /StatusTemplate (like mine :-)), though you can always tweak these. :) Jude (talk) 14:03, 2 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 18 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Thank you for the warning but the above user is inserting propaganda without a "verifiable" source and does not even look at the talk [6] and then reverts again to his version [7] without comment. I even called him "yakhi" (my brother) as a sign of friendship but I guess it didn't help. Khorshid11:12, 3 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
I am not inserting "propaganda". I am writing on the changes in Khuzestan's demographics. Much of the information concerning land confiscations, etc, is contained within the main body of the article and is well-sourced, linking to UNHCR and Amnesty International reports. You are blanking the section without saying which particular parts of it you have an issue with.--الأهواز11:23, 3 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
You created Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manbeast, it that a DELETE vote at the top of the page. If so then this is 3-0 to delete, otherwise 2-0. Only the very start of this debate and the result seems clear. I informed the author of the voting but he hasn't yet added his own vote. This one is going to be DELETE for sure. MichaelBillington11:36, 3 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
Sir Properly-Decapitated Podmore
Latest comment: 18 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi.. that was a great surprise.. i actually did not realise that it was you!! anyways i have written to the friends of mine.. he should be replying soon.. but it may take a few days as he is busy.. will let you know.. btw.. gr8 username! - Aksi_great (talk) 21:27, 3 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
Hello
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Bhadani has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk pages. Happy editing!
Invitation and Recommendations for writing articles on Hindi Wikipedia
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hindi wikipedia invites and welcomes Wikipedians to contribute for the cause of spreading knowledge and the Hindi language. This page contains guidelines for writing a wiki-article on any topic at the Hindi Wikipedia, with special recommendations for writing in Hindi (Note: The script/font-family for Hindi is Devanāgari; the script/font-system for English is Roman script, also, the Hindi spelling system is not completely standardized). This article is yet in English language (mostly), in order to encourage even non-native/foreign people who have learnt/are learning Hindi to contribute to the Hindi wikipedia, and native Hindi speakers who normally write in English. The examples given below are only for explanation.
Recommendations:
Firstly for proper viewing, it is recommended to keep all links NOT-UNDERLINED. Otherwise the मात्रा below the Hindi alphabets might get partly hidden behind the underlines. For this, please go to My Preferences (मेरी पसंद) at the top of the page, then click Misc., and then choose "underline links -> Never". Save your settings. Also, do not click yes for "justify paragraphs", otherwise on some browsers, the devanagari script will appear highly distorted.
All users are requested and encouraged to contribute articles here, especially, to create new articles on general topics. They are also encouraged to expand the existing articles, and improve upon them. A non-user can also do the same; it is recommended but not required to register yourself as a wikipedian user at the Hindi wikipedia. As far as possible, each article should be written with a Neutral Point of View (NPOV)—no nationalistic or partiality or hatred based articles are welcome. The articles should be based on facts—and appropriate references should be provided as and where needed. See the English wiki's help page for editing in general. Almost all the general wiki-features are available for editing on Hindi wiki too. Guidelines for the content matter is mostly the same as given in English wiki.
Since the Hindi wiki is at its initial stages, users are welcome to take introduction and basic points from the English (or another) wikipedia's corresponding article and translate them for small articles. An in-page link to the English wiki's article will be deemed sufficient for references (a template might be created stating this). For longer articles, it is recommended to mention the references separately.
Since most computer users in India and elsewhere have the standard Western-type keyboard, it is best recommended (but not necessarily required) to use the virtual (software) keyboard like the one of Hindimozhi or of ISIS (Tavultesoft Keyman)—which are freewares. These are advantageous because the contemporary Hindi-speakers in India often write messages/chat using Hindi words but written in Roman (English) script, and the layout of these keyboards is quite the same that such people use. For example, using the "normal" keyboard with this software, typing ga would give ग and ghaa would give घा.
Create the article with its name written in Hindi (devanagari script). Always take care to include the nukta (dot below) for foreign / Urdu loanwords wherever it occurs in the standard spelling. For non-Indian names, use that spelling (for article name and other words) which is commonly encountered in Hindi newspapers, G.K.-books, Hindi-dubbed TV documentaries and Hollywood films and magazines. e.g., America-अमरीका (या अमेरिका), China-चीन, French-फ़्रांसिसी. For English acronyms/short-forms, use the initials in Roman script, and again create a full form in Hindi and redirect it to the short form. e.g. IPA (अन्तर्राष्ट्रीय ध्वनि वर्णाक्षर); UNO (संयुक्त राष्ट्र संघ). Doing the opposite is also fine. But creating the article with the Hindi short form, as सं०रा०सं०, is not recommended. Also, the article proper must be written with the proper nukta, as फ़ारसी, and then, a non-nukta (mis-)spelt version फारसी should preferably be created to redirect to the correct spelling.
Hindi wikipedia strongly recommends the users to write articles in everyday common Hindi in the खड़ीबोली dialect (Hindustani or Hindi-Urdu, i.e., बोलचाल वाली हिन्दी, which may include many loanwords from Persian and Arabic). The use of शुद्ध संस्कृतनिष्ठ हिन्दी is in general neither required nor recommended. E.g., use: वजह instead of कारण, ख़ास instead of विशेष, वगैरह instead of इत्यादि, लेकिन instead of परन्तु etc. However, for technical and specialized vocabulary, the use of शुद्ध संस्कृतनिष्ठ हिन्दी is recommended and usually mandatory. Thus: upper House of Parliament—संसद का उच्च सदन, but not Urdu—मजिलिस का ऐवान-ए-बाला ; Foreign Minister—विदेशमन्त्री, but not Urdu—वज़ीर-ए-ख़ारिजा ; knowledge/science—ज्ञान/विज्ञान, but not इल्म. Use spoken Hindi's ये and वो instead of यह and वह / वे. Do not use the title of respect जी after names, it is unencyclopedic. Thus: कृष्ण / श्री कृष्ण but not कृष्ण जी. Use the आप form and its corresponding 3rd person verbal conjugation for writing about respectable persons. Thus: श्री वाजपेयी मध्य प्रदेश में जन्मे थे. But not: वाजपेयी मध्य प्रदेश में जन्मा था. But do not use the pronoun "आप" itself in-text in biographies.
English should be used sparingly, only when required; i.e., if the corresponding शुद्ध हिन्दी word is too "difficult and not generally encountered", or if it is a proper name of non-Indian person/place/terminology/title, or if the user is highly unsure of the proper translation. It is recommended (but not required) for English-to-Hindi translation while writing articles, the Shabdkosh online dictionary should be used. For each English word, that alternative should be used which is generally encountered in everyday spoken Hindi, and also fits well into the context. Use of intelligent guesses for newly encountered words is also allowed, and so are translations encountered in Hindi-dubbed TV documentaries, Hollywood films, Hindi-translated books, etc. e.g., दमपिशाच for en:Dementor (used in dubbed HP films).
If used, it is recommended to use the English words within the articles using the English (Roman) alphabets rather than devanagari (or better, the devanagari transliteration should be used in the sentence, followed by the English word in Roman alphabet in parentheses). Such words should be italicized and not put in quotation marks. Preferably, there should be an in-page interwiki link (like :en:) on the word to the English wikipedia. If the word comes as an integral part of a sentence, so as not to break the continuity, the en: prefix should be hidden by writing the word again after the pipe sign (piped link). Thus, recommended: हैरी पॉटर ने ''[[:en:Pensieve|Pensieve]]'' के अन्दर ''[[:en:Little Hangleton|Little Hangleton]]'' गाँव में लॉर्ड वोल्डेमॉर्ट की माँ ''[[:en:Merope Gaunt|Merope Gaunt]]'' को देखा. ''[[:en:Resplendent Quetzal|Resplendent Quetzal]]'' पक्षी के ऊपर एक मेक्सिकन पादरी डा० ''[[:en:Pablo de la Llave|Pablo de la Llave]]'' ने काफ़ी शोध किया था. Whence,
Always start the first 1 or 2 lines of the article giving its definition (from any standard dictionary/other wiki) or suitable introduction. Thus, recommended: ललिता सहस्रनामन हिन्दू धर्मसुधारक आदि शंकराचार्य द्वारा रचित देवी दुर्गा को समर्पित एक पूजा-मन्त्र है, जिसे कई हिन्दू रोज़ श्रद्धा से जपते हैं । But not: ललिता सहस्रनामन मन्त्र जपने के लिये लड्डू-पेड़ा, ताम्बुल, सिन्दूर, लाल चुनरी के साथ नित्य इस मन्त्र का पाठ करें, तो जल्द ही गड़ा हुआ ख़जाना मिलेगा । Recommended: वैमानिक अभियान्त्रिकी (en:Aeronautical engineering) विमानों (en:Aircrafts) की अभिकल्पना, निर्माण और प्रचालन करने का विज्ञान, कला और कार्य है । (translated from Eng. Webster's New World Dictionary). But not: आजकल वैमानिक अभियान्त्रिकी के लिये देशभर में कई कॉलेज खुल गये हैं, जिनमें अग्रणी स्थान यूटोपिया स्थित लालू-यादव टेक्लिनक कॉलेज का है ।
For names of countries, cities, places, languages, people, books, films, technical vocabulary, mythology, etc, start the article like this:
1. The name in bold ('''अपोलो''')
2. starting parenthesis, then English name in Roman script, in-page interwiki-linked to English wiki ff. by semicolon ((अंग्रेज़ी : [[:en:Apollo]];)
3. The native name(s) if applicable in the italicized native script, preferably followed either by its italicized approximate Hindi pronunciation or non-italicized phonological transcription within / /, ff. by closed parenthesis (यूनानी : ''Aπollων अपोल्लोन''))
4. the rest of the definition or introduction (प्राचीन [[यूनानी धर्म]] (ग्रीक धर्म) और प्राचीन [[रोमन धर्म]] के सर्वोच्च देवता थे ।) For country names, only the standard short form of the name is needed in the first line. If there is a common name for a difficult word in Hindustani, also mention it. Whence: अपोलो (अंग्रेज़ी : en:Apollo; यूनानी : Aπollων अपोल्लोन) प्राचीन यूनानी धर्म (ग्रीक धर्म) और प्राचीन रोमन धर्म के सर्वोच्च देवता थे । If you don't give the interwiki English/another language link (which would be deemed to be the default reference), then you MUST provide an appropriate reference.
Please leave no article without an appropriate category. See the list of created categories here; you can also make a new category (pref. in Hindi). Please leave no article without at least ONE off page (like en:) interwiki link. E.g., the user can check the article name (say Apollo) on the finally redirected English page and append to the Hindi article ([[en:Appolo]])). These interlanguage links will help a bot to update all interwiki links for that article in all wikipedias. The category and the aforementioned link should be typed at the end of the article. If the article is very small, mention it as a stub/substub.
Use of templates is welcome. See the list of templates here. If creating a template, name it pref. in Hindi.
Use पूर्णविराम ( । ) instead of a period (.) for ending statements. The पूर्णविराम, semicolon, colon and dash (but not comma) must come after one space after the word to prevent ambiguity. Use the international form of the Hindu-Arabic numerals (1,2,3 instead of १,२,३), as used by the Constitution and the Government of India (even for Hindi). There is no need to use the हलन्त at the end of Sanskrit words wherever it occurs. Hence, prefer: संसद over संसद्; अथर्वन over अथर्वन्. Use the proper quotation marks “” from the Insert toolbox, not "". Write dates as 2 मई 2006 (ईसवी or ईसापूर्व). Write time as 3:45 pm. Separate common suffix-words like शास्त्र, विज्ञान, ज्ञान with a hyphen. Thus: रसायन-शास्त्र. For most others, leave both the words of the noun-cluster free. Combine them into one word only if it is very common to do so. Thus: सामवेद.
The use of ज़ for the en:voiced alveolar fricative (/z/, as in zoo, rose) is fundamentally wrong. Its nearest counterpart is the en:voiceless alveolar fricative /s/ (as in sea), and not Hindi ज (en:voiced palatal plosive). Hence, it is suggested and recommended that for the sound /z/, whether it comes in English (etc.) spellings (z) for while pronunciation otherwise, should be transcribed as स़ (स with a dot below, available in the Insert toolbox). Hence: Reason रीस़न, not रीज़न ; Roses रोस़ेस़, not रोज़ेज़. But common Hindi words borrowed from Persian/Arabic (so-called Urdu words) are allowed to continue with ज़ spelling. Thus: ज़रा, नज़र, तर्ज़. The en:voiced postalveolar fricative (/ʒ/ as in treasure), inexistent in Hindi, can similarly be transcribed with श़. Thus: treasure ट्रॅश़र. The nukta (dot) available in the Insert toolbox can be combined with various consonants to suggest a more exact phonetic devanagari rendering of foreign sounds. E.g., since phonetically, English Think and this are not equal to थिंक and दिस, a better transcription could be थ़िंक and द़िस. Please take care of the dot below in so-called Urdu words, otherwise the Hindi spelling is deemed incorrect.
For the following English vowels met, mate, mat, transcribe as मॅट (short vowel), मेट (not मेइट), मैट (not मॅट, as popular in Marathi). However in contemporary Hindi and here, it is acceptable to use ए instead of ऍ. Thus: अमेरिका is more popular than अमॅरिका. For cot, coat, caught, transcribe as कॉट, कोट, कॉट (not कौट). Transcribe English /t/ and /d/ as ट and ड.
Use half-न before त, थ, द, ध, न, instead of anuswaar अं. Use half-म before प, फ, ब, भ, म. Use the anuswaar before all the rest of the consonants (not half-ङ, ञ, ण). If the मात्रा is not above the alphabet, use chandra-bindu, but only for nasalization. Thus: अन्दर, not अंदर ; अन्त, not अंत ; हिन्दी, not हिंदी ; सम्भव, not संभव ; पंचमी, not पञ्चमी ; अंडा, not अण्डा ; कंठ, not कण्ठ ; लैंड, not लैण्ड ; आँख, not आंख. However, both forms are acceptable in contemporary Hindi as well as here; the prec. are just recommendations.
When proceded by another vowel, use the pure vowels instead of य (unless the य is clearly articulated while pronouncing). Thus : जाएँ, not जायें (not जावें) ; आएगा, not आयेगा . However, both forms are acceptable in contemporary Hindi as well as here.
Please pay careful attention to the masculine/feminine gender (and singular/plural) in adjectives and verbs, else the sentence becomes ungrammatical.
For more information/suggestions/criticisms, please contact any one of the administrators of Hindi wiki here, preferably en:User:Magicalsaumy.
But it doesn't solve the problem of complex joint characters. Windows XP SP2 itself has a better support for it, provided u remember the keyboard layout. I got fed up with the phonetic IME. --soumসৌমোyasch10:04, 6 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
Ganeshk's Rfa
Latest comment: 18 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
May I request you to keep your cool? Also, "stubborn", unlike "stupid" is not a personal attack. Please understand that being the nominator, I have the highest stake in the success of this RfA, next only to Ganeshk ;-). I personally feel that Anwar is suffering from a persecution complex, thanks to the chat we all had on my talkpage in the not so distant past. It is probably better to let him be. --Gurubrahma11:35, 6 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
Calling someone stubborn might not be a personal attack, but calling someone a stubborn POV warrior is definately an attack. But, if you insist I will keep myself from it. Regards, --Nearly Headless Nick14:44, 6 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
AN/I
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hey, the institute is run by the non-profit Dhirubhai Ambani trust, that fall under ADAE. And AIEEE cut-off averages around 8k. And one thing that is very porly defined is the defn of ICT - nowhere is it specified that the emphasis is purely on digital systems. --soumসৌমোyasch10:48, 7 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
Thank you
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thank you for the welcome message on me "being back in action" - we all shall continue to be in action to make the Wikipedia the Best. --Bhadani15:27, 7 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
Thank You
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Greetings, fellow WikiProject Law member! One of our tasks on this WikiProject is the upkeep of Portal:Law, where we have set up a four week cycle wherein each week one of four key features - the selected article, biography, case, or image - is rotated out. Previous selections can be found at Portal:Law/former selections. Please contribute your thoughts at Portal talk:Law as to likely candidates for future rotations in each of these categories. Cheers! BD2412T04:58, 9 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
My RfA
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello, Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington/Archive/Archive04, and thank you for voting on my recent RfA! With a final vote of 84/1/4, I have now been entrusted with the mop, bucket and keys. I will be slowly acclimating myself to my new tools over the next months, but welcome any and all feedback and suggestions on how I might be able to use them to help the project. Thanks again! Kukini15:06, 10 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
Copyvio
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington, and thank you for your support at my request for adminship, which ended with an awe-inspiring 86/1/2 result. I plan to do much with my shiny new tools - but I'll start slow and learn the ropes at first. Please deluge me with assignments and requests - I enjoy helping out. For Mother Russia!! - CrazyRussiantalk/contribs/email04:58, 13 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
Thank you
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington/Archive/Archive04, thank you for voting in my RFA which failed eventually at a result of (91/51/8). I do not plan to run for adminship until a later date. Once again, I will like to thank you for voting. --Terence Ong(talk | contribs)14:26, 13 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
Thanks Sir Nick
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Dear Nearly Headless Nick, thanks so much for your support during my recent successful request for adminship. I really appreciate it. Let me know if you need any administrative support -- just leave me a message on my talk page or send me an e-mail if it's urgent. Take care man, and hope you're enjoying your new moniker! -- Samirधर्म05:10, 15 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for Supporting my RfA!
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thank you for supporting my Request for Adminship, which I am pleased to report that it passed by a margin of 54/6/1. Hopefully I will be a "good user" in the future with regards to my admin duties. If I slip up somewhere, please let me know! Thanks again for your support, Ian MankaTalk to me!23:43, 15 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
Thank you
Latest comment: 18 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I reverted the Talk: Aaron Brown page. The junk I deleted has nothing to do with the content of the article. I figured I'd let you know that, so you wouldn't think I'm a vandal or someone that has no clue what Wikipedia is about. OsFan21:10, 19 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
Re:culture of India...
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Where exactly did you get that there was a "capitalised sense"? I see nothing in Wikipedia policy to support your claim, nor in the Concise Oxford English Dictionary, nor on thefreedictionary.com. elvenscout74217:22, 23 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
RfA Thanks
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hey Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington, thanks for your support and congratulations! I've decided not to spam people with "thanks" messages, so please get yourself a piece of my RfA thanks to eat at your own leisure :) Cheers, Tangotango13:52, 26 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
Thanks a lot
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Latest comment: 18 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
You're jumping to conclusion and making statements based upon them that are rather annoying. Read carefully the full text of what I said. I even did like yourself and explained that the proper review of what has been occurring is needed. Netscott13:58, 28 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for your apology, as I just wrote on User:Ste4k's talk page it probably was just a question of a lack of explicitness in my commentary... I suppose such a lack can make it a bit difficult to understand. Netscott14:36, 28 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
A big thank you
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Latest comment: 18 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Saw your comments, I tend to go for nuclear warning with a shared IP, and a much shorter block of 15 mins or something like that. IMHO, once they get binned they get bored and usually move on to something else. Also it hopefully get their sysadmins aware of them messing around. I hope the blocking policy vote gets sorted soon.
Khukri(talk . contribs)07:56, 30 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello. I feel nice coming to your page. I also thank you for your input as regards above on my talk page. We shall surely interact more. Regards. --Bhadani16:20, 30 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
RfA thanks
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thanks so much for the support on my recent RfA, which I'm quite happy to announce has passed with a consensus of 67 supporting, 0 opposed and 0 neutral. I'm glad you considered me to be a good candidate, and I'll be working hard to justify the vote of confidence you've placed in me. Let me know at my talk page any time if I can help you with any admin-related tasks, or just if you have any comments on how I'm doing as an admin. Thanks! TheProject21:51, 30 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
You're welcome. It's easily done. Those two are complete morons—Lil maz vandalised the featured article of the day, which upset me as I found it more interesting than usual today. One doesn't expect vandalism from logged-in users as much. RupertMillard (Talk) 10:42, 1 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
Hey...
Latest comment: 18 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
Hi,I am protecting cited third party sources and have added nothing to the article. Moreover, I hope you have sent same guideline reminder to Wiki AnwarA- otherwise it may be seen a not neutral against wikipedia code of ethics. - Thanks, Thomas
My Edits to Khalistan article
Latest comment: 18 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hi! appreciate your concern on the edits. However the edits are in utmost good faith with high regard to to wikipedia NPOV policy. The so called references on the basis of which my edits are being reverted are blatantly biased and therfore highlyl disputed. The article presents part truth in a highly twisted manner that is completely derogatory of the Indian establishment. Many thanks! AnwarA12:01, 1 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello and thank you for giving me a chance to come to your talk page and talk with you. I agree with your comments, My inputs re there: [8]. Regards. --Bhadani17:51, 1 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
I should be careful, shouldn't I?
Latest comment: 18 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thanks for reverting my userpage from the recent vandalism. It's highly appreciated. I have a good idea who did it (one of my colleagues at school)... huntersquid17:43, 2 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
RFA thanks
Wiki_Indians meet-up?
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Idea sounds good, but I couldn't even make it to a meet-up in Bangalore recently (Kannada wp). As most of us are from different places, I'd think that it'd be difficult to pull it off. Also, real life has been catching up with me of late ;). We should probly have a straw poll on WT:INWNB on this issue - wrt date, time, venue etc. Funding wd be another issue - Wikimedia foundation would be more interested in sponsoring meet-ups for Indian languages' Wikipedias. --Gurubrahma13:05, 7 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
Howdy
Latest comment: 18 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington
Thank you for your vote in the Esperanza Elections. Your support is much appreciated, and it means that I am now in the Council. I will continue to try my best, and if you have any questions or queries, please don't hesistate to leave me a message. Thanks again, — FireFox 15:42, 10 July '06
Latest comment: 18 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hi! I would request you to view of a history of the edits on the Khalistan. I had earnestly set about to rid the article of POV and unnecessary and irrelevant anti-India, anti-Hindu statements. Where as Zafarnama is constantly re-introducing these edits. Statements like:
"Mary Anne Weaver of the Christian Science Monitor reports that the army operation was followed by killings of Sikh males between the ages of 15 and 35 in Punjab’s villages..."
"Punjab's current water levels ..." (these have nothing to do with the article.
"State Terror followed by Militant Response by Sikhs..."
I, user:sukh and a lot of other editors have tried to reason with but to no avail. Please see talk page. If I were to insert my POV, I could make a mention of countless acts of atrocities committed by sikh militants led by Bhindrawale. But apparently, whoever does not subsribe to Zafarnama's views is either a criminal or a liar. (He calls Khushwant Singh a liar too). He has called me a bigoted Hindu. Please see his uncivility on the talk page.
I don't care if you just delete the article, but as long as it is there, I will not allow it to be used for propogating hate against any community and in particular any country. AnwarA04:02, 11 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
I deeply appreciate the way that you have taken up the subject. Its always good to get a consensus before making a big change in any article. However, you can be bold if you like. Wikipedia has a three revert rule which you violated on the article. In case, some other user reverts to version which other users do not agree to, you can derieve consesus about the subject on the talk page of the article. Keep the rules in mind and be flexible, that'll do the trick. Warm regards, --Nearly Headless Nick13:59, 12 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
RFA
Latest comment: 18 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
You have just recently voted in Micoolio101's RFA and though I believe you meant oppose, you typed support. I do not want to change it, due to fear of going against policy, but please look over it and change it if you need to. --WillMak05038915:35, 13 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 18 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
Hello Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington/Archive/Archive04, and thank you for your support at my Request for Adminship, which succeeded with an overwhelming final count of (105/2/0). I was very pleased with the outpouring of kind words from the community that has now entrusted me with these tools, from the classroom, the lesson in human psychology and the international resource known as Wikipedia. The Free Encyclopedia. Please feel free to leave me plenty of requests, monitor my actions (through the admin desk on my userpage) and, if you find yourself in the mood, listen to some of what I do in real life. In any case, keep up the great work and have a fabulous day. Grandmasterka06:53, 16 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
To the people who have supported my request: I appreciate the show of confidence in me and I hope I live up to your expectations! To the people who opposed the request: I'm certainly not ignoring the constructive criticism and advice you've offered. I thank you as well! ♥!~Kylu (u|t) 01:05, 19 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
Stop by Gryffindor Tower later, I've got this cloak I need you to take a look at.... 01:05, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
Bhadani has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!
Latest comment: 18 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The Minor Barnstar
I notice that you work tirelessly to help Wikipedia out by making small corrections mainly. I hereby award you this minor barnstar for all the minor contributions you have made to improving Wikipedia. Killfest2(Talk)08:09, 22 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for contributing the impressive the pile of supports gathered on my RfA, which passed with a final tally of 0x0104/0x01/0x00. I'm happy that so many people have put faith in my abilities as an admin and promise to use the tools wisely and do my best not to let you down. If I ever may be of assistance, just leave a note on my talk page. Misza13, the rouge-on-demand admin wishes you happy editing!
NOTE: This message has been encrypted with the sophisticated ROT-26 algorithm. Ability to decipher it indicates a properly functioning optical sensor array.
My RfA
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I saw the announcement of extended wikibreak on his userpage and I know you are active at Werdnawiki. Does someone have the sourcecode for the bot? Does someone have the job of making adjustments and so forth? I'm just curious, knowing nothing about bots, but I see the requests and comments about the bot are continuing to come in. NoSeptember 19:40, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
I am only active as to experimenting with the wiki as an administrator. I wanted to learn about admin interface, and so I asked Werdna to make me a system operator on his wiki. As for the bot, I do not have any idea. You could ask User:Bookofjude though. I have seen him around. :) --Nearly Headless Nick11:35, 24 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
E-mail
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hey Andy/Nick/Headless, thanks for supporting my RfA, which registered a tally of 104/4/7. Which means...
I am now an admin!!!
I was and still am very flattered by all the kind comments that I recieved, I will also take into account the comments about how I could improve. I guarantee I will try my best to further assist Wikipedia with the mop. Feel free to drop in and say hi or if you need anything. Again, thank you so much! Yanksox04:05, 29 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
Quick Question
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi, I just have a quick Wikipedia protocal question.
I want to turn this page: List of guest stars on The Simpsons into something like this page: List of South Park episodes with the charts and images of each various thing. However, this would involve somewhere in the neighborhood of 400 images on one page. So, I was wondering what Wikipedias protocal on the matter is. Thanks! ~Scorpion0422
Latest comment: 18 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hi There! Can you translate my name in what language you know please, and then post it Here. I would be very grateful if you do (if you know another language apart from English and the ones on my userpage please feel free to post it on) P.S. all th translations are in alpahbetical order so when you add one please put it in alpahbetical order according to the language. Thanks!!! Abdullah Geelah18:58, 29 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Now running at 69 translations in total, with 34 of those confirmed. Still waiting confirmation on which Hindi one is the correct. Recently got Tagalog, Persian and Pashto, along with confirmed Bengali. I wanted to get 100 before making the tshirt, in which case I'm over a third of the way there :) And don't worry, your name is down on the list :) - FrancisTyers·10:56, 30 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 18 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Thank you again for nominating me. Your kind words in the nomination mean a lot to me. I was surprised by how many people ending up participating, even if ~50 of them are in the RfA Cabal. :) I'm not doing a big, inspired, markup heavy spam thank you to everyone who !voted as I feel they clutter and is against policy—I know not very rougish of me–but I am sending out a few thank yous. Please accept my first one and this small flower as a token of my appreciation.—WAvegetarian•(talk)17:25, 30 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thanks for your support on my RFA. The final vote count was (61/9/3), so I am now an administrator. Feel free to let me know how I'm doing at any point in time or if you need anything. Once again, thank you. Wickethewok16:16, 31 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
USA PATRIOT Act
Latest comment: 18 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The one I'm going to get started on sometime is USA PATRIOT Act, Title VI, but if you want to help grab any of the uncompleted articles in the template to the right. I'm currently summarising them, later I will see about going to the UNSW to find sources that comment on the Titles or the Act itself. It's slow going and lonely work, though! - Ta bu shi da yu12:39, 2 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
Congratulations, though it's unfortunate that Stifle jinxed it. Oh well. You can find the union hall of the Wikipedia Janitor's Union, a technically unaffiliated internet-based international branch of the SEIU, across town on Freenode Tube at #wikipedia-en-admins. You may pay your dues here. Before you can get into the union hall you will need to get your name on the access list by talking to one of the membership secretaries like Shanel or Essjay. :) —WAvegetarian•(talk)19:09, 4 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
To our newest admin
Latest comment: 18 years ago7 comments7 people in discussion
Dear Sir Nick, thank you so much for your beautiful words, your kidness and your trust in me. My Request for Adminship is finally over, and the support and appreciation that the community has gifted me will stick in my mind as long as I live. I have no way to properly express how grateful I am to you for all you've done for me, and all I can tell you is, I'll try not to disappoint you nor anyone else with my use of the buttons... and if I mess up, make sure to come here and give me a good yell! :) Seriously, tho, if you ever need my help, either for admin-related stuff or in any other way, you'll always be welcome to message me, and I promise I'll try my very best.
Dear Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington (wow! this feels like one of Shakespeare's plays, doesn't it? :) this is the perfect opportunity to finally speak to one another after reading your words for a looong time. I am sure that we'll be able to talk often, and trust me, it'd be my pleasure. Both your contributions and, most important your warm way to deal with others made me notice you long, long ago; and it's always a great pleasure to finally get to talk with someone whose thoughts you've become comfortable to read and with whom I usually agree with. I sincerely hope this is but the beginning of a friendship, and such thought fills me with joy. I only wish I knew a shorter name to call you by! :) Oh, and how could I forget - congrats on your well deserved mop! ;) With a big hug, your friend,
Latest comment: 18 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Hello Sir Nic. The barnstar came as a great surprise to me, particularly so as to-day only I had presented one to Ambuj.Saxena: [9]. I am not sure of myself to deserve the one for me. I thank you, and accept the barnstar on behalf of the community of wikipedians. Thank you my dear. May you continue to excel in real life as well as here as a wikipedian. --Bhadani13:47, 5 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I was alphabetizing dozens of users (mostly in the main admin category), but hey, if you want to be the only user listed under U (other than the guy whose username actually starts with a U) that's OK with me ;). ps, does the removal of the red button mean that I can't block you anymore? Cheers, NoSeptember 12:53, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
I considered that possibility, considering the major change to the page in that edit, but it was more fun to assume it was directed at me ;). I hope the removal of the list of articles you worked on doesn't indicate that you plan to become an admin-only admin, as opposed to a article-contributor admin. NoSeptember 09:31, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
Tdxiang congratulates you!
Latest comment: 18 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion