Sir Jimmy Wikipedia, CBE
Sir Jimmy Wikipedia, OBE, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit
|
Hi Sir Jimmy Wikipedia, OBE! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 10 October 2016 (UTC) |
Speedy deletion nomination of Psycho Killer (video game) edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Psycho Killer (video game), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:06, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
October 2016 edit
Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to Psycho Killer (video game). I noticed that when you added the image to the infobox, you added it as a thumbnail. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this:
|image=[[File:SomeImage.jpg|thumb|Some image caption]]
Instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do:
|image=SomeImage.jpg.
There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as |caption=Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks! Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:54, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
Making bad requests at Wikipedia:Changing username/Simple edit
Hello. I noticed that you've made two requests at the aforementioned page less than 24 hours after your last username change. Please note that having a username changed is not a process that should be taken lightly, and carefree or otherwise ludicrous requests will not be accepted. Thanks, —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 21:21, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation edit
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HowToDoLife, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
October 2016 edit
 | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Mkdwtalk 19:49, 25 October 2016 (UTC) |
Question. edit
@Just Chilling: Hi Just, and thanks for the quick response. I will now accept the Standard Offer. One last question though, is editing wikis like Conservapedia (the right wing Wiki) considered block evasion? Your help will be appreciated. Thanks. SirJim 18:15, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
Question for administrator edit
answered=yes Hello there, per the advice at WP:UTRS, I am currently doing the standard offer, however I accidentally made a single edit via an IP 2 days ago. The edit was from the article I.M. Meen, and was a fix. This was completely my fault, and I apologise. The question is will this set back my Standard Offer? If so, I understand and I will accept that. Thank you.
--SirJim 18:10, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
- You should declare any edits you have made in your UTRS unblock request and that should of course be done via your master account. -Ad Orientem (talk) 05:33, 18 September 2018 (UTC)