Your submission at Articles for creation: Haresfoot School (November 13) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Qcne (talk) 19:03, 13 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, SirLioneLL! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 19:03, 13 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

November 2023 edit

  Hello, I'm Funnyfarmofdoom. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Billy Sharp, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Funnyfarmofdoom (talk to me) 14:45, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Funnyfarmofdoom. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Billy Sharp, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Funnyfarmofdoom (talk to me) 14:45, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Berkhamsted School, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. I'm afraid it doesn't matter what you personally may know about life at the school. Information here must be cited and referenced to a reliable published source. MichaelMaggs (talk) 23:11, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Berkhamsted, you may be blocked from editing. Reverted due to lack of sources and poor grammar. MichaelMaggs (talk) 23:14, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

If you would like to continue to edit here it's important that you read the warnings above very carefully and follow the rules set out on the linked pages. You need also to make sure that you check your edits thoroughly for grammatical mistakes. At the moment virtually all of your edits are unsuitable for the reasons stated, and editors have had to revert them. You run the risk of being blocked from editing unless you change your editing practices. MichaelMaggs (talk) 23:30, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Haresfoot School edit

  Hello, SirLioneLL. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Haresfoot School, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:05, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Nicholas Moseley edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Nicholas Moseley requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.nickhernbooks.co.uk/nick-moseley. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —asparagusus (interaction) sprouts! 15:11, 3 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nicholas Moseley (May 3) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 15:31, 3 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia and copyright edit

  Hello SirLioneLL! Your additions to Draft:Nicholas Moseley have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:06, 4 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Haresfoot School edit

 

Hello, SirLioneLL. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Haresfoot School".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:57, 13 May 2024 (UTC)Reply