Simon sprott

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:08, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

October 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, one or more of the external links you added to the page Web Services Description Language‎ do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Precious Roy 14:25, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Re: Changes undone?

You added links for a company's site to multiple articles and created an article about that company's software, which, whether or not you work for that company, qualifies as spamming. That's why I specifically targeted your edits. (Please refer to WP:SPAM and WP:EL for guidelines.) If you feel the other external links you referred to should be removed, you have the power to do so yourself. As for the deletion of the article you created, I merely marked it for an admin's attention; the admin is the one who decided that it qualified for deletion. Precious Roy 13:09, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Note: Part of your edits to Rusty tussock moth‎ were also removed due to spam concerns here. Precious Roy 13:12, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for Image:ScreenShot XsdEditor.png

Thanks for uploading Image:ScreenShot XsdEditor.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 18:20, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Liquid Technologies

A tag has been placed on Liquid Technologies, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please visit the article for details.

You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Codf1977 (talk) 20:47, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of XML Studio

A tag has been placed on XML Studio, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Codf1977 (talk) 20:48, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Liquid Technologies & XML Studio

I have nominated Liquid Technologies & XML Studio, two articles that you created, for deletion. I do not think that the articles satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liquid Technologies. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Codf1977 (talk) 21:18, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

XML Studio

Hi, You may not have seen my reply on the artical talk page before it got deleted, but the deletion of this article was discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liquid Technologies with a out come of The result was delete. Rough consensus indicates that the article does not meet the relevant notability guidelines. Codf1977 (talk) 14:52, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for submitting an article to Wikipedia. Your submission has been reviewed and has been put on hold pending clarification or improvements from you or other editors. Please take a look and respond if possible. You can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Liquid Technologies. If there is no response within twenty-four hours the request may be declined; if this happens feel free to continue to work on the article. You can resubmit it (by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article) when you believe the concerns have been addressed. Thank you.Codf1977 (talk) 15:20, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Liquid Technologies concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Liquid Technologies, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 11:57, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:SimpleXsd Logical.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SimpleXsd Logical.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Amitosh.swain (talk) 07:47, 18 October 2014 (UTC).

Possibly unfree File:SimpleXsd Physical.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SimpleXsd Physical.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Amitosh.swain (talk) 08:07, 18 October 2014 (UTC)