Silvrous

Hi Silvrous,

Welcome to Wikipedia!!

Thanks for protecting The Picture of Dorian Gray against vandalism here, maintenance is a never ending job on Wikipedia.

If you're interested in working on other literature articles you could join Wikipedia:WikiProject Literature, otherwise here's some advice for beginners. If you have any questions you can just pop a note on my talk page.

Thanks again and I hope you enjoy editing as much as I do. Best wishes, --Ktlynch (talk) 11:53, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

You still haven't answered my question so tell me is in a sane world 5.277.068 > 7,403,836 true or not ??I'm showing you a fact im just wondering if you have intelligence to see it.Veriteo (talk) 08:45, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

LOL Im asking you just a question answer it so that you might get those FACTS you were looking for.Veriteo (talk) 12:05, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Invitation to tea

Hello! Silvrous, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. An awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! Charles (talk) 14:32, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

You Have Been Nominated to be an Administrator

Go to Your page now to start!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Keelan717 (talk • contribs) 15:09, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

If this nomination and transclusion was made without your consent, and you do not want it, please let me know as soon as possible and consider leaving a comment on your RfA that you withdraw it so that it can be closed. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:54, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Silvrous. You have new messages at Kudpung's talk page.
Message added 16:02, 1 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your RfA

Don't worry; I closed it. A boat that can float! (watch me float!) 16:57, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Never mind; I got an edit conflict. A boat that can float! (watch me float!) 16:59, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

It's been deleted and the user indefinitely blocked. A boat that can float! (watch me float!) 18:25, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Yep, I beat him to the close and the delete nomination. Nothing else to worry about here. Mdann52 (talk) 15:29, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

Stub tags

Please note that {{stub}} should go at the end of an article, after everything except inter-language links, not at the top as you did in Andrei Peteleu. See WP:ORDER. Thanks. PamD 16:38, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

Dana Shires

Hi Silvrous. Can you explain to me in a little greater detail how the citations of sources on the Dana Shires article could be improved? (I was careful to provide a source for each "chunk" of information I included in the article.) Thanks.--Vistawhite (talk) 04:21, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Canada Iran

That first line sounds silly without what I added. I'm going to put it back for now if that's ok. Don't see how it wasn't neutral by all means.--71.67.123.12 (talk) 08:15, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

No, the structure "to state the obvious" is condescending and does not adhere to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of view (WP:NPOV) policy. Silvrous ^Talk 08:16, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Why sources

Why did Wikipedia dosent accept unsourced material 99.229.41.79 (talk) 18:09, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia should only contain sourced material, in order to be a trustworthy source of information. Please see WP:V for a detailed explanation. Silvrous ^Talk 18:16, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

CIR

much better. Thanks. --76.106.149.108 (talk) 20:13, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Salai

I am not at all sure why you decided to delete a wad of information that had been added to that article.

NOTE: the added information contained some solid facts.

I notice that you have been nominated as an administrator. I would oppose that nomination on the following grounds.

• You twice deleted a lengthy, newly added section, by a newbie, presumably without reading it to see what value it added.
• You labelled an addition that contained factual material, and had been placed into the article in the correct sections, as vandalism!
• The addition had several problems. If you are a sufficiently experienced editor to be an admin, then you must have enough experience to identify and correctly label the individual problems.
• So what were the problems?

1. unreferenced. Then you should put in a tag.
2. some poor expression of a type which indicates clearly that English is not the person's first language. As an English Wikipedia admin, you ought to be able to correct a few errors of expression.
3. Speculation/POV/Original research e.g. "This might have been because....." Any statement that uses words like that needs a OR or POV warning (depending on the precise nature of the speculation).

This is the manner in which a good administrator would approach a section of added material by an inexperienced editor. An administrator's job is to facilitate editting.

Amandajm (talk) 02:39, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

I do not have a lot of experience on anti-vandalism, and indeed made a mistake in this case. I am thankful that you saw the mistake and corrected everything. Before writing such a lengthy note, however, I would always check whether my thesis is actually correct. Your thesis, my being nominated for administrator, is actually quite incorrect, the "nomination" was done by a vandal some time ago. But thank you for the information. I will keep in mind what you said from now on. Silvrous ^Talk 06:28, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for your message. I was unaware that vandals were now going around nominating people for things! Amandajm (talk) 07:01, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to the CVUA

Hello I am Calu2000 (talk) 07:56, 9 September 2012 (UTC)}} welcome to the counter vandalism unit academy. First of all I would like you to read (in full) Wikipedia:Vandalism and Wikipedia:Cleaning up vandalism and present me any questions you have. Please contact me on my talk page with any queries you may have Calu2000 (talk) 07:56, 9 September 2012 (UTC).

Matt Cardle

Hello, Silvrous. You have new messages at Bobo6balde66's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Motion Planning

Thank you Silvrous for bringing to attention lack of edit reason on the paper reference removal, that was my mistake. I am a writer of the paper that is about to be submitted to ICRA, this is my work that needs to be removed from wikipedia until after the submission. Lucidation (talk) 21:08, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

By the way, thanks for stepping in on this issue from before, it looks like I was essentially being trolled by the user Andy Dingley as he has others. I am looking forward to hopefully adding contributions on intelligent data structures & motion planning in the future. Lucidation (talk) 07:00, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

CVUA

Hello! Thank you for your interest in CVUA. I have been selected as your replacement instructor. I am happy to get started with you. I will email you my contact information so that we can communicate effectively. I am willing to use Instant Messaging, IRC, or talk pages, or whatever method you may prefer to keep in touch. I would first be interested to know what areas of instruction you would be most interested in. Another editor has raised the question that since you already appear to be experienced and effectively reverting vandalism, we might not have much left to teach you. So if you want to share what you already know and what you would like to get out of a course here, that would be great. See you soon. Elizium23 (talk) 02:59, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for taking me on! I do have some experience with Twinkle, I usually patrol the IP user recent changes. I've had problems identifying non-obvious vandalism. I'd like to start using STiki and perhaps Huggle to revert more easily, and also patrol registered users, which I haven't really tried. Silvrous ^Talk 09:15, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Okay, I have sent you email from my account, so you should have in hand my IM and other contact info. How do you prefer to communicate? I have found in the past that IM works best for intensive sessions. Elizium23 (talk) 05:14, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

I'm all for IM, but I don't know if it would be feasible(I'm on GMT +2), so we might have to stick to talk page most of the time. I'll add you on Skype. Silvrous ^Talk 18:27, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

OK, I'll look for you on Skype. And you don't need to use {{Talkback}} for me, I have your talk page watchlisted and in WatchListBot, I am alerted as soon as the message goes in. Let's get down to brass tacks. I can help you with STiki, as I have used it and I still have the capability to use it on my computer. I have not used Huggle, and it is not supported natively by my operating system (Linux). If you are really interested in finding out about it, I could try and install it under the Wine environment, but truthfully, you may just be better off asking another instructor about it. Our chosen software is listed in the status page of CVUA. I can also tell you that I found it extremely useful to patrol "new editors' contributions", especially for conflict of interest issues. You can easily find vandalism here; the trick is not to conflict too much with all the other Recent Changes patrollers, who will have already seen the edits... but out of registered users, it is the more fruitful way to identify unconstructive edits. Now, as for identifying non-obvious vandalism, I can tell you that the most common form of non-obvious vandalism is the factual error. I help myself in this category by maintaining a large watchlist of articles within my chosen topics of interest, of which I am fairly knowledgeable. It is easier to spot the factual error if you know about your topic! Recent changes patrol won't be too much help here. Sometimes I find myself checking references and using Google Search and other resources to identify a factual error, and I do find that I learn more about the topic as I research it. Sometimes I am even able to add references where there was none before, or start a discussion about the inclusion of a fact. This is all recommended stuff if you want to be a constructive member of the Wikipedia community, but it is peripheral to my objective as a CVUA instructor. I can tell you that all vandalism has certain hallmarks that you can use to "score" in your head whether an edit looks suspicious. A red-linked username; no edit summary given; one fact turned into a contradiction; date changed in one place and not another. Not an exhaustive list, but some of the more common red flags I encounter on a daily basis. Another behavior that is non-obvious is copyright violation. It doesn't just happen to new articles. The number one thing to watch for is large blocks of text added in a single edit. Especially if it is un-wikified. Especially if the language sounds more promotional, or un-WP-like. Simply paste some of the text into Google Search and find an exact match. This requires immediate removal and a warning to the user. Copyright violations are not vandalism, but they do crop up often for me, so it bears mentioning. Other types of vandalism can occur on talk pages, for example, one user refactoring the comments of another. Changes in formatting and fixing links can be OK, but even spelling corrections can be disruptive and somewhat rude to the original writer. In my topics, I often find posts that fall under WP:NOTFORUM and are immediately removed, as they have no suggestion for improving the article. Not vandalism, usually done in good faith. It is less common to see the former behavior, but it can be hard to spot; sometimes users forget to log in and they are fixing their own comment, when it appears that an anonymous IP is changing an established editor's comment... requires a judgement call to tell what happened, sometimes you just revert and don't issue a warning. OK, that is my brain dump for the evening. I noticed you are already making reports to WP:AIV using Twinkle. Do you have any questions about AIV for me? I often report there, and I can tell you that I find it to be one of the more efficient notice boards, without much drama or backlog and administrators are responsive with blocks or page protection as necessary. Speaking of that, I see you have also used WP:RPP once; if you have any questions about that I would also be glad to answer. I most frequently use Twinkle for all these actions, if you are comfortable with it then I am too. OK, see you tomorrow. Elizium23 (talk) 06:47, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi

Hi Silvrous i've just added a tiny bit to John Barrowman about another book cuz him and his sister has. Hope that is ok. Smason177 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smason177 (talk • contribs) 11:35, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Verifying

There have been an announcement from different world's newspapers that Emeli Sande married in Montenegro, in September this year, and took the last name Radojevic, which is one of her husband's last names. Furthermore, that has been explained by Emeli as well in an interview after her Montenegro concert. 95.155.29.204 (talk) 14:57, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Page Curation newsletter

Hey Silvrous. I'm dropping you a note because you've been using the Page Curation suite recently - this is just to let you know that we've deployed the final version :). There's some help documentation Wikipedia:Page Curation/Introductionhere that shows off all the features, just in case there are things you're not familiar with. If you find any bugs or have requests for new features, let us know here. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 12:01, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Lora

Hello, I have deliberately removed the Lora 'History' section from the article you mention. I have explained why on talk page. I hope to be able to make major editing too soon, and for now I am still pondering whether to join wikipedia or not. Thanks 39.54.127.212 (talk) 23:41, 25 September 2012 (UTC)Col (Retd) Mumtaz Khan, Pakistan

Remember to "subst"

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When using certain templates on talk pages, as you did to User_talk:Ttwaring, don't forget to substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use {{subst:uw-test1}} instead of {{uw-test1}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template. Thank you. - Ttwaring (talk) 20:31, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Re Woman in Islam Article

This article is full of assertions and lack of objectivity. Any insertions I made in response were perfectly acceptable and were not insertions, but added a level of objectivity previously missing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emmetfahy (talk • contribs) 13:30, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Hi, I agree the article is in need of a serious cleanup, and many of your changes work towards that. However, edits such as: "However, the tribal nature of Arabia emphasised the complete subjugation of women to men and its was this idea rather than the Quranic statments on equality before God that became the norm in the Islamic world" or "The practical result of Islamic teaching on the status of women has meant for the most part that women are unfairly represented in courts, whether religious or secular."

are original research, with no sources to back them up. In this case, the facts should speak for themselves, any conclusions being drawn might come close to violating WP:NPOV. Silvrous ^Talk 13:36, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

change of Emelie Norenberg

Hi Silvrous. It took me a while to find where to message you because I´m not that good with high-tech. Please let my age be 27 and my year of birth 1985 and let all the changes made on this wikipdeia of me still be there. Everytime I´ve tried to change it, someone changes it back to wrong things. I don´t know how to give a "reliable" source, but this is me, Emelie Norenberg writing, and I dont want my age to be wrong on wikipedia and nothing else to be wrong about what i do now or what I study or work with. How can I keep these changes and make them permanent. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.89.143.114 (talk) 22:19, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Achilles

I did not constitute vandalism. I was just putting in a fact. I erased a historical misconception. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.229.239.155 (talk) 19:34, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

I apologize for misidentifying your edit, the sentence "the mad that brought great suffering" was gramatically incorrect and appeared to be nonsensical, which is why I considered it to be vandalism. Silvrous ^Talk 19:38, 22 February 2013 (UTC) It's all righht. If you think that I did something wrong, you can tell me, but before you tell me, you can edit my contributions.

Rollback

After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback can be used to revert vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback may be removed at any time.

If you do not want rollback, then contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some information on how to use rollback, you can view this page. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, just leave me a message on my talk page if you have any questions. Happy editing! Malinaccier (talk) 19:38, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Also, I've given you the reviewer permission. You can read about that at WP:RG Malinaccier (talk) 19:40, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Welcome to STiki!

Hello, Silvrous, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Information about STiki, including: Using STiki and its hotkeys Comparison to other tools Information about vandalism on Wikipedia Here are some pages which are a little more fun: The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users! Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes! We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (talk) 15:40, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

czavoianu

Hello. I don't think that dividing the total GDP values by the total population count qualifies as original research (and neither does Wikipedia itself for that matter). I think that if you have two newer pieces of date and simply divide them in order to obtain a better approximation of a more outdated piece of data, somewhat goes in the spirit of Wikipedia itself: by providing people with the most recent, trustworthy and well correlated data. This is why I undid your undo on the GDP per capita of Romania. If you still think that my arguments are wrong, feel free to undo my change again and I promise I will not debate/act on this subject anymore. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Czavoianu (talk • contribs) 11:17, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Hey

Mehmet Akif was Albanian. Don't try to screw the history, You will lose visitors and I'll report your site for trespassing — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blertarustemi (talk • contribs) 21:19, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Flare (pyrotechnic)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Flare (pyrotechnic). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 19:15, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Talkback|WilliamBillyB

This is a reply to a message you left for me when I was under IP 109.90.226.35 because I was unable to log-in in the usual manner.

I had made some minor changes to neutralise the wording of some claims, following Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy. You said you reversed my changes without specifying what and why. Why not talk about it first and then modify?

The entire topic surrounding claims made by Muslims regarding science is dubious and unsubstantiated. Wikipedia should serve as a neutral resource to show what happened and what did not happen. Naming this era the Islamic Golden Age is a total misnomer as the ideology, worldview and religion of Islam had nothing to do with the scientific advancements made and there is no such thing as Islamic science.

The contributions at the time were limited to translations and the furthering of some knowledge. Why not have Wikipedia reflect this? Many Muslims believe that there were ground-breaking discoveries and mind-boggling inventions made at the time. This not the case, so why not let Wikipedia reflect this? Great people did great work and contributed to the advancement of science and the understanding of science. Why not have Wikipedia reflect this?

WilliamBillyB (talk) 20:06, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, but adding "what Muslims like to call" before the accepted terminology for a historical era because you do not agree with it is not neutral, it makes the whole sentence sound derisive and condescending, and contravenes Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy. Moreover, your statements that the name of this era is "a total misnomer" and that "there is no such thing as Islamic science" seem to be contradicted by numerous sources in the articles in question. Wikipedia reflects what is found in sources, there is a no original research policy. Silvrous ^Talk 16:48, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Admin intervention

Hello, I have noticed that there is a kind of a edit war going on at Rocinia, should I take this to Administrators noticeboard? Thanks, Happy_Attack_Dog "The Ultimate Wikipedia Guard Dog" (talk) 15:25, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi, it wasn't really an edit war, just an IP vandal that deleted his initial warnings; I see that he's been blocked now, so the situation should be resolved. Silvrous ^Talk 15:30, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Привет

Почему вы можете исползовать изображение File:Maya the Honey Bee.jpg и мы нет? Как нам бы эта картинка годилась на рувики и не только на эй.--89.190.68.18 (talk) 19:01, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Objectivity/DB

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Objectivity/DB. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:America: Imagine the World Without Her

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:America: Imagine the World Without Her. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Charlie Hebdo shooting

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Charlie Hebdo shooting. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Breitbart (website)

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Breitbart (website). Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Creation–evolution controversy

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Creation–evolution controversy. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on File talk:World marriage-equality laws.svg

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on File talk:World marriage-equality laws.svg. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Army Ranger Wing

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Army Ranger Wing. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Head of state

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Head of state. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ag-gag

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ag-gag. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ken Ham

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ken Ham. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Institute of Economic Affairs

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Institute of Economic Affairs. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Democratic Party (United States)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Democratic Party (United States). Legobot (talk) 00:03, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Words to watch

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Words to watch. Legobot (talk) 00:06, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:G. Edward Griffin

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:G. Edward Griffin. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Operation Dragoon Ride

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Operation Dragoon Ride. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Zeitgeist (film series)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Zeitgeist (film series). Legobot (talk) 00:03, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of largest cities in the European Union by population within city limits

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of largest cities in the European Union by population within city limits. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:2014 Israeli shelling of UNRWA Gaza shelters

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2014 Israeli shelling of UNRWA Gaza shelters. Legobot (talk) 00:06, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

The truth must be heard

Stannis is the King. It is known. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.185.211.177 (talk) 19:11, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:2015 Kumanovo shootings

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2015 Kumanovo shootings. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Succession to the Throne Act, 2013

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Succession to the Throne Act, 2013. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Aboriginal communities in Western Australia

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Aboriginal communities in Western Australia. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Hillary Clinton

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Hillary Clinton. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Political positions of Jeb Bush

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Political positions of Jeb Bush. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Wales Green Party

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Wales Green Party. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Greek government-debt crisis

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Greek government-debt crisis. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi, I guy that you talked to about leaving a message of the "rules of snooker" page. I wanted to post that message on the talk page instead of on the page itself. Unfortunately, when I went to the talk page of the "rules of snooker" page, I found no space in which to post anything. So, I was forced to post my message on the page itself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:80:C200:15B8:9897:C45F:6B7C:93DB (talk) 19:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Congratulations from STiki!

	The Anti-Vandalism + STiki Barnstar
	Congratulations, Silvrous! You're receiving this barnstar because you recently crossed the 1,000 classification threshold using STiki. We thank you both for your contributions to Wikipedia at-large and your use of the tool. We hope you continue your ascent up the leaderboard and stay in touch at the talk page. Thank you and keep up the good work! West.andrew.g (developer) and ƬheStrikeΣagle 07:32, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Giraffe

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Giraffe. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Tambayan Philippines

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Tambayan Philippines. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jeremy Searle

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jeremy Searle. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Abkhazia

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Abkhazia. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Hillary Clinton email controversy

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Hillary Clinton email controversy. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Dental caries

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Dental caries. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Periodic table

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Periodic table. Legobot (talk) 04:32, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Silvrous. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Protests against Donald Trump

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Protests against Donald Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:United States presidential election, 2020

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:United States presidential election, 2020. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Volunteer (Ireland)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Volunteer (Ireland). Legobot (talk) 04:27, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

1. Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
2. Editor-focused central editing dashboard
3. "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
4. Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
5. Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:11, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Glossary

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Glossary. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of American police officers killed in the line of duty

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of American police officers killed in the line of duty. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:United States presidential election in the District of Columbia, 2016

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:United States presidential election in the District of Columbia, 2016. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Raymond Chan Chi-chuen

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Raymond Chan Chi-chuen. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Dublin Regulation

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Dublin Regulation. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Silicon Alley

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Silicon Alley. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:James O'Keefe

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:James O'Keefe. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Elections and Referendums

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Elections and Referendums. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Collective punishment

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Collective punishment. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Reza Aslan

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Reza Aslan. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Melania Trump

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Melania Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Sean Hannity

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sean Hannity. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Office of Victims of Immigration Crime Engagement

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Office of Victims of Immigration Crime Engagement. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Silvrous. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:ReleaseTheMemo

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:ReleaseTheMemo. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of Trump–Russia dossier allegations

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of Trump–Russia dossier allegations. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Iranian Majlis

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Iranian Majlis. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Social policy of Donald Trump

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Social policy of Donald Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Alliance for Securing Democracy

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Alliance for Securing Democracy. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:National Rifle Association

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:National Rifle Association. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Abiy Ahmed Ali

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Abiy Ahmed Ali. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:National Rifle Association

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:National Rifle Association. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Y-DNA haplogroups in populations of South Asia

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Y-DNA haplogroups in populations of South Asia. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Silvrous. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 08:02, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 08:39, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:LGBT on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:30, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 08:31, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:List of Donald Trump 2020 presidential campaign endorsements on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:30, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Religion and philosophy request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Adam in Islam on a "Religion and philosophy" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 09:30, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Religion and philosophy request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Hindutva on a "Religion and philosophy" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:31, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:List of Hispanic and Latino Americans in the United States Congress on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:08, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Basis (linear algebra) on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:32, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Religion and philosophy request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Catholicism on a "Religion and philosophy" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:30, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:2020 Ganja missile attacks on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:31, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Feedback requests from the Feedback Request Service

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Great Wall of China, Talk:Los Angeles Police Department and Talk:Decca Aitkenhead on "Politics, government, and law" request for comments. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:15, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

You've been unsubscribed from the Feedback Request Service

Hi Silvrous! You're receiving this notification because you were previously subscribed to the Feedback Request Service, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over three years.

In order to declutter the Feedback Request Service list, and to produce a greater chance of active users being randomly selected to receive invitations to contribute, you've been unsubscribed, along with all other users who have made no edits in three years or more.

You do not need to do anything about this - if you are happy to not receive Feedback Request Service messages, thank you very much for your contributions in the past, and this will be the last you hear from the service. If, however, you would like to resubscribe yourself, you can follow the below instructions to do so:

1. Go to the Feedback Request Service page.
2. Decide which categories are of interest to you, under the RfC and/or GA headings.
3. Paste {{Frs user|Silvrous|limit}} underneath the relevant heading(s), where limit is the maximum number of requests you wish to receive for that category per month.
4. Publish the page.

If you've just come back after a wikibreak and are seeing this message, welcome back! You can follow the above instructions to re-activate your subscription. Likewise, if this is an alternate account, please consider subscribing your main account in much the same way.

Note that if you had a rename and left your old name subscribed to the FRS, you may be receiving this message on your new username's talk page still. If so, make sure your new account name is subscribed to the FRS, using the same procedure mentioned above.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask on the Feedback Request Service talk page, or on the Feedback Request Service bot's operator's talk page. Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:00, 22 March 2021 (UTC)