October 2019 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --Rowan Forest (talk) 13:26, 8 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest edit

  Hello, SilvestroAntonio. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 15:26, 8 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

You will be blocked edit

if you don't comply with the above. Doug Weller talk 15:26, 8 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

October 2019 edit

  Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. MrOllie (talk) 18:07, 8 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Doug Weller talk 18:44, 8 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SilvestroAntonio (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Useless block to prevent damage or disruption. October 2019[edit source] 1. Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --Rowan Forest (talk) 13:26, 8 October 2019 (UTC) Begin the ’Wikipedia vandalism’ a phenomenon for which the IP address of the user matches an IP address used by a blocked account and the message sent by Mr. Rowan Forest sent before the undersigned subscription, the blockage of the neo user could be reportable as slander, otherwise, manifestable on international newspaper. Or Mr. Rowan Forest is going to edit the Wikipedia laws in the meanwhile? 2. You will be blocked[edit source] if you don't comply with the above. Doug Weller talk 15:26, 8 October 2019 (UTC) Whenever Sir Doug Weller would caress the cheeks of the undersigned, he could take an appointment on his private Gym, a part posing himself with the colleague of the opposite sex, the present remind him that before discouraging new editors, that silently edited and contributed to Wikipedia believing in the transparent sharing of information referencing them according WIKY with Creative Commons BY SA, that writing an autobiography to link the shared information would be the step that him of any other 'Wiki editor' would have been done within the day 12th of October, properly four days after the account opening and right '10 editing'. Thank you in advance for the collaboration, to the next comma edited. Kind Regards, User:SilvestroAntonio talk 23:43, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I don't know what this is, but it is not an unblock request, so I am declining it. Please read WP:GAB to learn how to craft an acceptable unblock request. 331dot (talk) 21:43, 8 October 2019 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • Note you will need to use UTRS if you would like to make an appeal. If it's anything akin to what you have written above (and the material you added to various articles), it will be declined outright.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 21:45, 8 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
  • So, I sent that message "before" you created your account? Then who made this edit in Human evolution? Your evil twin brother? -Rowan Forest (talk) 21:51, 8 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

 
This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

SilvestroAntonio (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #27048 was submitted on Oct 09, 2019 11:55:42. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 11:55, 9 October 2019 (UTC)Reply