Abu Dhabi International Book Fair

edit

Hi Siebzehnwolkenfrei,

I noticed your question in an edit summary of Bookfair.

Usually Wikipedia articles are not about single events, such as the upcoming Abu Dhabi International Book Fair, unless the event is notable in and of itself.

If the Abu Dhabi International Book Fair is notable, I would suggest starting an article titled Abu Dhabi International Book Fair, having a good lead section that specifies why it is notable. That article would be a good place to discuss the history of the event, including an upcoming date.

« D. Trebbien (talk) 16:12, 9 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

We hope ...

edit

... you will follow the Wikipedia principles and a cooperative way of "working" in this Wikipedia. Cleaning your edits up already takes a lot of resources in the German Wikipedia. Please avoid to draw additional capacities for worldwide clearance.--84.158.114.68 (talk) 17:23, 9 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Bookfair

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Bookfair, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Malleus Fatuorum 17:44, 9 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Shodashakalah

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Shodashakalah requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. George Ponderevo (talk) 14:56, 23 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

July 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Association football culture may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • detrimental to the game, and an issue for supporters. Published academic research on this question (by [[David Ranc]] seems to demonstrate the opposite.<ref>{{cite book |last=Ranc |first=David |title=
  • ...) first (...) into [[church]]. (...) Then (..) not I was playing - [[it]] in a [[flow]]...."'' (::(Vgl.: [[Willigis Jäger]] "... denn auch hier sind Götter", S. 78 f., 64.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:09, 12 July 2014 (UTC) Many thanksSiebzehnwolkenfrei (talk) 15:08, 15 July 2014 (UTC)Reply