edit
 

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Shri Prabhuji, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.vedism.in/shriprabhuji.htm. As a copyright violation, Shri Prabhuji appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Shri Prabhuji has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Shri Prabhuji and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Shri Prabhuji with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Shri Prabhuji.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Ohconfucius (talk) 07:22, 30 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

File:Shriprabhuji.jpg listed for deletion

edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Shriprabhuji.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:58, 6 January 2009 (UTC)Reply