Welcome! edit

 
Picture of the day!

Hello, SidQ19, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Happy editing!

Are you ready for editing? edit

The
Adventure
 

Hi SidQ19!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. Hope to see you there!


This message was delivered by Sam Sailor 13:55, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
Reply

yes ofcourse SidQ19 (talk) 05:08, 14 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

July 2021 edit

  Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Anjaam—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 11:57, 12 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Karobaar: The Business of Love. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ----Rdp060707|talk 05:46, 13 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Anjaam, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

 
The Show preview button is right next to the Publish changes button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Sam Sailor 13:53, 13 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Bol Radha Bol. ----Rdp060707|talk 08:20, 14 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

SidQ19, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit

 

Hi SidQ19! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Jtmorgan (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jallaad. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Jallaad was changed by SidQ19 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.853907 on 2021-07-12T16:12:39+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:12, 12 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Bhushan m bhandari per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bhushan m bhandari. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 05:51, 15 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

SidQ19 (talk) 09:15, 15 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

To be unblocked, please follow the instructions above. 331dot (talk) 09:21, 15 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SidQ19 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Your reason here SidQ19 (talk) 09:32, 15 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot (talk) 10:07, 15 July 2021 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock my account edit

Some useless bastards her jealous on me because I am improving the articles of Wikipedia and they have blocked my contact my address from Wikipedia so please help me to unblock. SidQ19 (talk) 17:31, 15 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

SidQ19 (talk) 17:33, 15 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Stop messing about. If you wish to be unblocked, make a request. WP:GAB explains how. You need to address the claim you've violated WP:SOCK, as nothing else is relevant. Note that you are in danger of losing access to this talk page, so make your request count. No more help-me's, no more empty unblock requests, no more removing declined unblock requests. --Yamla (talk) 17:35, 15 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
STOP IT. Stop it immediately. You are either fundamentally incompetent or you are outright trolling. WP:GAB explains how to make an unblock request. Read it. All of it. I want to be incredibly clear, no more unblock requests until you have read and understood that, and until you address your abuse of multiple accounts. You will not get another warning. --Yamla (talk) 17:37, 15 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
Oh. Too late, another admin revoked your talk page access. That leaves you with WP:UTRS. Be warned, they aren't likely to tolerate requests like you've been spamming here. --Yamla (talk) 17:40, 15 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.