Si467

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Si467/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 13:06, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello! Si467, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 13:06, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:James Calder (2) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:James Calder (2). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 15:14, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Hi Robert - many thanks. The original draft was set up by Matt and I have taken this over and removed the external links etc and hope it is now suitable for publication. I have asked Matt to delete the other draft from his folder so hopefully this one is now the only version (and also should now be in the correct format). Let me know if you have any concerns and many thanks for your patience. SiSi467 (talk) 16:11, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

James Calder drafts

Hi Robert - many thanks. The original draft was set up by Matt and I have taken this over and removed the external links etc and hope it is now suitable for publication. I have asked Matt to delete the other draft from his folder so hopefully this one is now the only version (and also should now be in the correct format). Let me know if you have any concerns and many thanks for your patience. Si

Have you communicated with the author of the other James Calder draft? Has one of you copied portions from one draft to the other? How come they are so similar? Robert McClenon (talk) 03:50, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Calder (surgeon) has been accepted

James Calder (surgeon), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 19:59, 28 October 2016 (UTC)