Shrink55

Welcome to the Wikipedia.

Community Education Centers

I see you are repeatedly removing cited material from the Community Education Centers page. If you are unwilling to explain such deletions, it may be considered vandalism. If you would like to talk about your objections to most of the content on this page, please go to the talk page. Thanks, Paul, in Saudi (talk) 16:09, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

I interpret your deletion of the cites in this article and have reported you. Paul, in Saudi (talk) 16:34, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

June 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Community Education Centers. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try and find a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 16:36, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Community Education Centers, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 16:37, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

And please don't call an editing dispute vandalism. You need to explain your changes on the article's talkpage, preferably with your own references that support your concerns. Acroterion (talk) 16:39, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Please address you concerns at Talk:Community Education Centers, explaining why you think the cited material is unsatisfactory. Please remember that all material in Wikipedia is expected to be sourced to published material, and that removal of references is a matter of concern. Wikipedia's coverage of a given subject reflects coverage in mainstream media, so if an organization is controversial in some manner, that controversy should be reflected in the article. If you have specific concerns about the interpretation of the sources, please address that, and if you have published sources that contradict the sources used, please provide them. Wikipedia works by consensus and collaboration. You might want to review WP:V, [{WP:RS]], and if you are associated with the subject, WP:COI. Bear in mind that a neutral point of view does not allow the removal of all negative information: it does, however, require that the POV be expressed in proportion to coverage in mainstream media. If you have concerns that can't be resolved by constructive discussion with other editors, you may wish to seek dispute resolution. Acroterion (talk) 16:56, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Community Education Centers, you may be blocked from editing.  -- WikHead (talk) 22:38, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:04, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Your Question to Me

On my talk page, you asked why I wrote the article as I did. Having no preconceived knowledge of the company, I simply wrote what the reputable media has published. You see, Wikipedia is based on what can be cited, not our own opinions. I see that you are new here. I hope your introduction to Wikipedia has not been too rough. If you can bring balance or new cited material to this or any article, I encourage you. Please ask me for help if you like. i am standing away from the article for a few hours to let passions cool, besides it is bedtime here. I do hope you will continue here, we need editors from all over. Paul, in Saudi (talk) 17:17, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your kind response. I am new to wikipedia as you noted. How would I send materials to add to the definition that you originally described? Do I just place it on the page, send it to you as the original author, or send it to a Wikipedia editor?

Once again, thank you for responding in the manner that you did.

I think Paul's gone to bed (he is, after all, in Saudi Arabia). I'd suggest that proposed wording and relevant references (you can use bare URLs for this purpose for now) go on the so-far unused article talkpage so they can be discussed. Acroterion (talk) 17:56, 21 June 2012 (UTC)