User talk:Shirik/Archives/2014/July
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Chillum in topic Frenchman101
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Frenchman101
Hello. I am reviewing your block of Frenchman101.
I agree the block is valid. I am just wondering if the leap from 24 hours to 1 week may have been a bit drastic?
The user is taking in the whole 3RR vs edit warring thing and perhaps a 48 hour block would be more productive? While the edit warring does have to stop this does seem to be a good faith editor.
I am very interested in your opinion on the matter. Chillum 06:04, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
- I have no concerns dropping the time down to 48 hours. The jump was probably a little excessive but I felt it was warranted at the time since the block had literally just expired. --Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 08:39, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
Thank you. I will keep an eye on this user for sure. Chillum 15:21, 27 July 2014 (UTC)