ShinyDitto8002

Speedy deletion nomination of User:MarxVideos

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:MarxVideos, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
• It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.

Your username is inappropriate (WP:PROMO), please change it. Regards Valdemar2018 (talk) 06:04, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia Ban

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of name and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:

• Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
• Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
• Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page.

Deb (talk) 10:34, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ShinyDitto8002 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

1357924680m (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Reason The username is involved in my youtube account, which I will never do so again. The username is not connecting with commercials, personal usernames and accounts or anything else that violates the username policy. I will continue to do other edits and articles without self-advertisement. Also, the youtube account is mine and only mine, hence i am not getting paid on advertising.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline because we've increasingly come to disallow usernames that are predominantly long strings of seemingly random characters that would not be easy for other users to remember as confusing. — Daniel Case (talk) 01:33, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ShinyDitto8002 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Although the username is bound to my Twitch account, I haven't publicly declare the bounding of the account, and I haven't and will not plan on doing any advertising activity temporarily, and if so, not using Wikipedia as a method to. I will continue to do other edits and articles without self-advertisement. Also, the youtube account is mine and only mine, hence i am not getting paid on advertising.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:36, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ShinyDitto8002 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

The username is no longer related to my Twitch account anymore, and after a long period of self-reflecting the ban, I have genuinely recognized the mistakes, and will no longer, and by I mean no longer, I mean NEVER EVER AGAIN use Wikipedia as a self-advertising media. The entire thing that is going on about my ban is because I self-advertised on the userpage, not of trolling, edit-warring or violating any edit rules, and there I can swear that I will no longer allow myself to be banned permanently of my account of such small reasons that could be easily fixed. Moreover, said in my last ban appeal, I haven't publicly declare the bounding of the account, and I haven't and will not plan on doing any advertising activity temporarily, and the youtube account is mine and only mine, hence i am not getting paid on advertising. Finally, thank you for reading all of this text, I will continue to contribute to the society, or at least, not cause damage to the well-functioned, well-managed, long-lasting treasurous website in the vast seas of the internet, and will no longer... be a bastard.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:19, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

ShinyDitto8002 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

The username is no longer related to my Twitch account anymore, and after a long period of self-reflecting the ban, I have genuinely recognized the mistakes, and will no longer, and by I mean no longer, I mean NEVER EVER AGAIN use Wikipedia as a self-advertising media. The entire thing that is going on about my ban is because I self-advertised on the userpage, not of trolling, edit-warring or violating any edit rules, and there I can swear that I will no longer allow myself to be banned permanently of my account of such small reasons that could be easily fixed. Moreover, said in my last ban appeal, I haven't publicly declare the bounding of the account, and I haven't and will not plan on doing any advertising activity temporarily, and the youtube account is mine and only mine, hence i am not getting paid on advertising. Finally, thank you for reading all of this text, I will continue to contribute to the society, or at least, not cause damage to the well-functioned, well-managed, long-lasting treasurous website in the vast seas of the internet, and will no longer... be a bastard. And on another note, this block has been going on for over a year. My soul has changed and became more mature, and I have faith that I won't cause any disruption in Wikipedia. The last two responses have been procedural declines involving the request lasting for weeks, hence there isn't really a meaning to continue blocking me anymore.

Accept reason:

Based on Special:Diff/1085597494/1085781129 below and the convincing appeal. User has renamed and blocking administrator has consented to an unblock. Welcome back! Sdrqaz (talk) 12:23, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

The last decline specified You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. this is not that, its the exact same request just with an additional couple of sentences. Lavalizard101 (talk) 17:48, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for your input. ShinyDitto, I have a question regarding the unblock appeal above. You state that you "will not plan on doing any advertising activity temporarily" but also stated "NEVER EVER AGAIN use Wikipedia as a self-advertising media". Which one is it? @Deb: I'm inclined to unblock, pending a clarification above. Do you have any thoughts? Sdrqaz (talk) 15:29, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

If you feel the user understands the guidelines, I am happy for you to unblock. Deb (talk) 11:02, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

@Deb the phrasing "will not plan on doing any advertising activity temporarily" was one year ago. The latter is true. Even though I am still conducting advertising, Wikipedia will never be an option. ShinyDitto8002 (talk) 11:23, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Thank you, Deb. Sdrqaz (talk) 12:23, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 262 (Number) (March 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bilorv was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:262 (Number) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:262 (Number), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Bilorv (talk) 15:37, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello, MarxVideos! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Bilorv (talk) 15:37, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

globally renamed MarxVideos to ShinyDitto8002

globally renamed MarxVideos to ShinyDitto8002 --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:09, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:262 (Number)

Hello, ShinyDitto8002. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:262 (Number), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:262 (Number)

Hello, ShinyDitto8002. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "262".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:06, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 262 (Number) (May 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Fade258 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:262 (Number) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:262 (Number), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fade258 (talk) 11:38, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

@Fade258 The objective of this submission is to make the number a separate, an independent, a standalone article, which can also work out as a redirect page on it's own, like 261 (number), not to rely on the redirected 260 page. Please consider twice, and may you please approve this. ShinyDitto8002 (talk) 11:46, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

ShinyDitto8002, I would like to remind you that, I am not against your submission. Yes, I understand your words but would you please see this article once i.e 261 (number), 263 (number), these articles probably helps you to understand. Thanks! Fade258 (talk) 11:52, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Fade258 I don't understand. Why doesn't 262 deserve a standalone article but 261 and 263 can just because they're prime? This article is longer than 263, is, to some extent, even more unique than 263, and the article you marked it is redirected to another article where it is crammed together with 260, 264, 265, 266, 267 amd 268? ShinyDitto8002 (talk) 07:01, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

@ShinyDitto8002: Do one thing all the content which you had added in your draft copy that all the information or content and then paste it into this article. Fade258 (talk) 07:22, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

okay, thank you. ShinyDitto8002 (talk) 07:31, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:262 (Number) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:262 (Number). Thanks! Fade258 (talk) 07:45, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 262 (Number) (May 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gusfriend was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:262 (Number) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:262 (Number), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gusfriend (talk) 11:25, 17 May 2022 (UTC)