User talk:Sherurcij/complaints

Amusing Complaints

It's schmucks like you (and Bush) who turn the world into the shithole it is today! --Nelson Ricardo 09:55, 11 December 2005 (UTC) (from Talk:Main Page)

Leave your recalcitrance at home.

Polish citizens slaughter Jews by the hundreds at the same time as a systematic genocide of Jewish citizens in Europe, and you don't think that it has anything to do with the Holocaust? Please. Kade 21:45, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

Let's take a look at what The Holocaust is, The Holocaust is the name applied to the systematic state-sponsored persecution and genocide...by Nazi Germany and collaborators. Now are you saying that Poland was the same country as Germany, or that the Poles were German collaborators? Since neither is true, we're left with the simple answer that one mass murder is not always part of another mass murder happening at the same time. On November 9th 1963, a coal mine explosion killed 458 Japanese workers, and at the same time, a train wreck killed 160 people. Now, the two events are not the same, they're not part of some greater conspiracy against the Japanese working class...they're two separate incidents. Sherurcij ^{(talk) (bounties)} 23:01, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

Don't Waste Your Time Folks

Sherurij considers himself the God or Emporer of all things known. He baits you into anger and then retorts that you are the one who is unjustly accusing him of something that he doesn't understand! He is deliberate and a meglo-maniac! He will edit your edits and take credit for his own insights, while demeaning you of yours. He will lower you to angry comments and then smugly respond that he said no such thing or that you misunderstood! He is all things to himself and you are all things for his amusement except Super Mario 3. He has no peer. He edits without concensus and complains when someone else does. He uses pointless analogies and tries to get you to fit square pegs into round holes. He is a magician of the mind where he believes he can create an illusion to throw you away from your thoughts and in the process, convert you to his POV. Yes, he is a piece of work, but what it is, I hope we never find out!!!Subwayjack 20:32, 8 December 2005 (UTC)Subwayjack

It's Roquefort cheese, thank you for asking :) Besides, it's hardly my fault that Super Mario Brothers 3 is better than you are...in fact, you rank about Super Mario Brothers 2-ish, so that's bad. Sherurcij ^{(talk) (bounties)} 20:44, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

Dick cheese sounds more fitting for you!!! I don't waste my time with games, you crazy Canuck!Subwayjack 21:07, 8 December 2005 (UTC)Subwayjack

You keep swearing you're leaving because you hate us all, I'm a cheese-eating dick son of bin Laden who lives under a bridge...then you keep coming back...I'm confused, is it really a torrid love affair in your heart, where really you find yourself so drawn to me, that you can't pull yourself away? I do have that Animal magnetism, don't I? *preens* Well, if you'd like to drop me a private message of a more...intimate nature, I'm sure we have lots in common and I would love to hear about your favourite naughty fantasies ;) Sherurcij ^{(talk) (bounties)} 01:14, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

Let's forget the above exchanges and let me ask you a question. In your comments to Kate, what do you mean by "mainstream" thinking? Also, I may be overly zealous, but is "violently" an appropriate term? Thanks in advance for a cordial exchange!Subwayjack 03:40, 10 December 2005 (UTC)Subwayjack

Your silence until now proves my prior points. Kate said the contribution would be acceptable, let her decide along with any future issues you have with me. Now butt out!!Subwayjack 20:12, 10 December 2005 (UTC)Subwayjack

Dudley the dragon

FYI, that "article" did qualify as nonsense. I tagged it as such as an anon. These kinds of idiotic stubs flood this site on a daily basis. As it stands, it's better off as a redirect. Please be a bit more civil in your edit summaries.  :) - Lucky 6.9 17:29, 20 July 2005 (UTC)

just because a stub offers no information beyond "A television program", doesn't mean it should be speedy-deleted, it should be expanded upon. Sherurcij 17:32, July 20, 2005 (UTC)

With all due respect: Baloney. I just looked at some of your other edit summaries, so I'll be brief: If you wish to clean up vandal bot stubs and anon experiments, feel free to do so. If I happen to tag garbage for speedy and you revert it without making substantial improvements to said garbage and compound the problem with a rude edit summary, we are going to have some issues. Just some friendly advice. - Lucky 6.9 17:34, 20 July 2005 (UTC)

I don't revert shit, I improve it so that people like you don't delete valid articles. Somebody creating an article that simply lists a valid television program as "a television program" is not "patent nonsense", it's an article to be expanded on, a stub article given, etc...all things I do. As for "if I wish to try cleaning up, feel free to do so", you'll notice that's what I do. Sherurcij 17:36, July 20, 2005 (UTC)

Once more: Please mind etiquette and please do not compound the problems left by vandals and/or experimenters. - Lucky 6.9 17:47, 20 July 2005 (UTC)

I'm not sure I understand how expanding short stub articles is "compounding the problem", perhaps you could explain this? Sherurcij

Alfred Boucher

This is becoming a bit irritating. This is not an article. It is an incomplete sentence. I have retagged it as a speedy delete. Unless you are willing to greatly expand this, please leave it be. One more thing: One more edit summary like the one you left and I will report you for vandalism of this site. - Lucky 6.9 21:47, 26 July 2005 (UTC)

I'm not claiming it's an article, I'm pointing out that it's a stub of a historical character which will one day be expanded on. As per your threats, save them Sherurcij 21:59, July 26, 2005 (UTC)

No, it was NOT an article. To your credit, what you did was to create a stub. However, I do not make threats. I do make promises. See you on the vandalism page. - Lucky 6.9 22:09, 26 July 2005 (UTC)

See: I'm not claiming it's an article, I'm pointing out that it's a stub

*le sigh*

Anyways, yes, have fun on the vandalism page Sherurcij 22:16, July 26, 2005 (UTC)

Studying or being studied

Do you mind toning down your right wing pro us retoric this is supposed to be an encylopodia not a repository for supports of George W and his Criminal allies. I have reported you to the internation commitee for the removal of illegal Giob Shites, you can expect to find your self Detained as a Moronic Combatent. You will be treated in the same way as your countries Cuba Kidnap Victims. Any attempt to deny this will results in your summary execution. Yuo have no rights--195.188.141.133 15:05, 27 September 2005 (UTC)

This is a bizarre complaint, considering I'm Canadian and considered quite a critic of US foreign policy in real life, though I try to maintain the utmost neutrality in articles on Wikipedia. Also, your grammar is appalling, please seek help immediately. Sherurcij 15:47, 27 September 2005 (UTC)

Right wing vandal

Why do you carry on the pretense of being left wing. When your attempting to tar people with the terroist brush that the US wants, withut the benefits of proper and legal courts? What are you up to?--Son of Paddy's Ego 14:04, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

lol, the fact I'm being accused of being right-wing really just shows how little bias I exhibit. I assure you, as I have before, that I'm a former member of the Communist Party of Canada and an avid follower of both Tolstoy and Chomsky. This doesn't mean that I think Bush is the devil incarnate, but hopefully leaves me sitting somewhere between leftist intellectual and the next Castro.

I am not 'up to' anything, other than trying to provide a fair and unbiased image of the countless people in modern history that would otherwise be forgotten.

I can't really believe that what I do is 'what the US wants', since the US military, government and media have all tried very hard to make sure the average person knows nothing about who Hani Hanjour actually was, just as they have with all the 'faceless villains' that they expect the world to simply hate and kill, without knowing who they are.

I'm sorry I'm not a radical 14-year-old as I'm guessing you are, but I assure you that vandalizing articles to say Richard Belmar was a guy the US lied and said was a terrorist and kidnapped and illegally detained because George Bush is a Nazi is not helping the world's view of the left-wing. So on behalf of those leftists who would actually like to be taken seriously, please shut the fuck up.

Yours truly, Sherurcij 14:33, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

You even recite the Right Wingers defintion of a Left winger as your credo, are you infact New Labour. What you engaged in is a rather childish excercise, part of which invloves labeling people incorrectly--Son of Paddy's Ego 14:55, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

Your reading comprehension seems to have completely failed to just read anything I just said, I suggest you re-read it, possibly with a dictionary in hand. Sherurcij 15:13, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

No I think you'd better go over the history of the left in more detail.--Son of Paddy's Ego 15:18, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

I'm easily amused, perhaps you could tell me where you think 'the left' originated? You know, so I can go study it and realise how correct you are Sherurcij 15:19, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

POV?

Regarding your reverts of my edits to those yankee child and women Vietnam War murderers, I am not a vandal, actually I am Wikipedia administrator. Do you think it is POV to have those "people" under "War criminals" category? Many civilians were killed in My Lai, but only one American soldier from Vietnam War is listed under this category. So maybe he killed these villagers himself or maybe these civilians killed themselves, hah? "War criminals" category is a valid category, but as of 14 January, still underpopulated. So if you know some people who are "real" war criminals and aren't categorized yet, feel free to categorize them. Have a nice day. - Darwinek 16:30, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

Then I suggest your adminship is misplaced, how can one say "How dare you accuse me of POV...those Yankee child and woman murderers..." with a straight face? I've tried twice now and failed, clearly you have a lot of practice. The reason only one American soldier from the event is because only one American soldier was ACTUALLY CHARGED AND CONVICTED from the event. War is hell, shit happens, and not every US soldier who's killed somebody deserves to have you go around labelling them War Criminals. Sherurcij ^{(talk) (Terrorist Wikiproject)} 16:33, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

There is a question how much independent are American courts and if Republican administration for over 40 years isn't "war criminal" itself. I found a few articles on Wikipedia about terrorist SUSPECTS who were categorized under "Terrorists" category. Isn't that a POV? Like labelling "terrorists" all detainees at Guantanamo and other innocent people in CIA secret prisons around the world. --Darwinek 18:18, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

Two wrongs don't make a right sweetie, didn't your mommy ever teach you that? Sherurcij ^{(talk) (Terrorist Wikiproject)} 18:21, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

Go fuck yourself white boy. - Darwinek 18:34, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

AfD

Go suck a fuck. MKBR3 05:38, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Okay, what the hell? How does one suck a fuck? Please, let me introduce you to a dictionary. Sherurcij ^{(talk) (Terrorist Wikiproject)} 05:39, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Drink bleach asswipe. I don't care what you think, the article is bullshit. TR90210 05:42, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

But bleach can be a toxic substance! Causing injury or even death! If you were interested in reading about the history of Bleach, I'd recommend checking out the article on Claude Louis Berthollet! Sherurcij ^{(talk) (Terrorist Wikiproject)} 05:46, 24 January 2006 (UTC)