Welcome!

Hello, Sherlockspock, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Wizard191 (talk) 16:01, 1 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Decades edit

Hi, re this edit - please note that per WP:DECADE, the correct forms would explicitly state the century, i.e. 1990s and 1984, not '90s and '84. Also, yesterday you applied the wrong spelling fix: "worshipped" is correct for British English, which per MOS:TIES is the preferred form for all Doctor Who articles. You're doing some good work though; keep it up. --Redrose64 (talk) 15:43, 24 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Redrose64, and thank you for letting me know of my mistakes. Re: the decade fixes, I try and keep consistency within a document/article, and did not realize that the four-digit year is Wikipedia standard until you pointed it out. I've also started checking any unfamiliar spellings, particularly doubled consonants or lack of same, by setting my Word language to UK English, something I hadn't thought of until I'd edited an article or two. From now on, I won't look to see if a Doctor Who article has a notation that British English is to be used; I'll just know to use it.
Thank you for your message, and if you notice anything else I should be doing or not doing, I would genuinely appreciate the head's up. I'm kind of new to editing Wikipedia; I'm just one of those anal people who can't read something without proofing it at the same time, and then having the strong need to fix anything I find.--Sherlockspock (talk) 18:27, 24 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
There are possibly a small number of exceptions, but other than American actors like Mekhi Phifer I've not come across any - they would necessarily concern someone or something with strong American ties. Of the obvious candidates for use of American English, there was some debate about Torchwood: Miracle Day and directly-related pages, but these seem to have fallen on the British side; and although John Barrowman is an American citizen, his article uses British English because of his Scottish birth.
If you have questions, just ask here because I have this page on my watchlist. --Redrose64 (talk) 19:55, 24 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the offer; I might just take you up on asking questions. And it didn't occur to me that a specific choice had been made to use UK English spellings for a British TV series. As I'm familiar with most UK spelling differences I never saw them as typos; it only became an issue for words with which I wasn't familiar, and the first several of those I encountered had the Category notation on British English.
Had I been involved in the Torchwood: Miracle Day debate, I'd have come down on the side of American English usage, what with it being produced by Starz and being set largely in the US. OTOH, I guess I can see an argument for keeping it UK English, given the rest of the series is set in the UK.
Thanks again for your help, both with Wikipedia editing and with Doctor Who.Sherlockspock (talk) 21:29, 24 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Doctor Who edit

Hello! I've noticed you've been doing a good job of copyediting Doctor Who articles! I was wondering if you would like to join the WikiProject where you can collaborate with other editors (including me). Glimmer721 talk 21:26, 27 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Oh, I'm sorry, my page notice was not clear! I meant that I would perfer a {{Talkback}} template so I would know when you replied. I've changed it; it's not your fault. Don't worry, I've only gotten into episodes prior to 2010 recently and joined the project before then, and I've seen none of the classic series. Anyway, proofreading is a great way to start and is of help. Also, don't feel that once you join you must contribute excessively. It's just a great way to meet with editors, ask questions, and see the topic's Manual of Style. Glimmer721 talk 02:00, 28 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
Oh, geez; I *am* sorry! The fact that I'm new at this whole talk page thingie, and templates and such, really shows, doesn't it? Now I know, so thank you so much. The Wikipedia policy of being patient and polite is certainly helpful for someone like me, who wants to learn but gets turned off by ad hominem attacks before instructions.
And I have been searching for a Doctor Who-specific style manual since Saturday, when I noticed there appeared to be no consistency of style across articles and I wanted to fix that; now I know how to find it so I can start cleaning some of these things up. I'll mosey on over and join up now! Thanks awfully. --Sherlockspock (talk) 02:41, 28 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
The link given above was a redlink (the capitalisation varied). Rather than amending it, I've created a redirect from that to the proper page, because it's probably a common capitalisation mistake. --Redrose64 (talk) 11:36, 28 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Emoticons edit

Hi, saw your comment on Redrose64's talk page. There is a template that produces smileys if you wish to use them on talk pages - {{Smiley}}. Mjroots (talk) 08:06, 7 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for April 28 edit

Hi. When you recently edited Male pregnancy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alien Nation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 28 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

WikiWomen's Collaborative edit

WikiWomen Unite!
Hi Sherlockspock! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative.

As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by:

Feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can participate!

Can't wait to have you involved! SarahStierch (talk) 00:04, 12 October 2012 (UTC)Reply