ShanghaiWu

Welcome!

Hello ShanghaiWu, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay!

Please read The Five Pillars of Wikipedia to help you get to know this place, and you might want to look at What Wikipedia is not to see what is and isn't suitable for Wikipedia.

And remember, don't submit copyrighted work without permission. By submitting your work you promise you wrote it yourself, or copied it from public domain resources — this does not include most web pages.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages or ask a question. Again, welcome!  Philg88 ^♦talk 06:44, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

March 2014

Hello, I'm Fraggle81. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Han Chinese because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Fraggle81 (talk) 14:52, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello there. I've decided to remove many statements as well because I notice the whole millet-rice talk because in addition that there's no citation,it have nothing to do with DNA analysis.

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 13:33, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Edit-warring

Hi,

Please don't edit-war, as you have been at Sino-Tibetan languages. Doing so may get you blocked. Instead, when your edits are rejected, discuss it on the talk page. — kwami (talk) 07:11, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

Already brought it to talk page.

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 08:16, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:22, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Evidence for my case.

Ancient y-dna in Longshan proves a high freuqency of O3 y-dna [1]. Our analysis of three ancient Miaozigou individuals revealed that they all belong to haplogroup N1(xN1a, N1c), while the main lineage of the Yellow River valley culture is O3-M122

and Miaozigou represents the Yangshao Culture of the Yellow River valley

[2]

Do you know what y-dna is clearly the current evidence indicates that Longshon had O3 while Yangshoa had N meaning Yangshoa could not be ancestral to Longshon 209.236.86.201 (talk) 00:15, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

No,as long your source does not says "Yangshao is NOT paternal ancestor' to Longshan,then you can not add something new on your own. That just your opinion,doesn't mean you source says or think the same.In fact,your source just prove my point and demonstrate what I mean. You claim that Yangshao is not ancestor to Longshan because N is discovered there but your source said something totally different.

>The existence of N1(xN1a, N1c) in the Miaozigou site could be evidence for the expansion of the Hongshan culture during its heyday, a view supported by archaeological evidence of Hongshan influences at the Miaozigou site[15].

Your source said the N belong to Hongshan who enter Miaozigou.This is in contrast with what you said. Your reference has DIFFERENT IDEA from yours. Like I said,wikipedia is not place to publish your own thought. You are violating wikipedia policy.Please do not add your own thought.ShanghaiWu (talk) 01:32, 2 September 2014 (UTC) N y-dna was found in the Yangshao and the Hongshan [3] 209.236.86.201 (talk) 02:25, 2 September 2014 (UTC) You may be right but I dont have time to research it until the 4th of September because I have a test so i will leave the article alone till that day or latter 209.236.86.201 (talk) 02:33, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

The N-DNA found in Miaozigou of Yangshao which according to the author is from Hongshan people. Regardless, as long as your reference DOES NOT SAYS 'Yangshao is not paternal ancestor to Longshan',then you are not suppose to write such things in wikipedia. In other words'Not in Citation Given'. You are free to have your own opinion but here in wikipedia,we have a policy and we need to follow the rules. Therefore,the statement 'Yangshao is not paternal ancestor to Longshan' which are not found in any of your source are not supposed to be published in wikipedia because that just your own thought/opinion.ShanghaiWu (talk) 02:46, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Booi Aha

Sorry for the very late reply. It depends on the subjection of Booi Aha. If Booi Aha within the Eight Banner system, then they were most likely assimilated by Manchu. Especially at the end of Qing, the boundaries among Manchu, Mongol, Han, and Booi aha within Eight Banner were very blurred. All Bannermen are tended to be considered as Manchu. If it is the Booi Aha who belong to a specific bannerman, it really depends on the situation.

Be aware that Booi aha can be two different group of people. The one within the Eight Banner system, aka 包衣 in Chinese, belongs to the emperor or mighty royal princes. They are only slaves to their lords but ordinary people in society. Another group is known as 旗下家奴 in Chinese. Their attributes are more private and can be subordinated by any Bannermen and their social level is bondservant which mean unfree status and depend household (considered as part of their lords' family member). --Šolon (talk) 03:59, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

March 2017

Your addition to Haruki Murakami has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:21, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

So in other word, I just need to paraphrase it? What about the quote directly make by the Haruki Murakami himself? Can that be copy paste or must paraphrase? ShanghaiWu (talk) 04:08, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, ShanghaiWu. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, ShanghaiWu. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)