User talk:ShakespeareFan00/Sfan00 IMG/Archive 15

Hi. Please explain what is the problem concerning "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:100,000_Lebanese_Pound_Banknote.jpg" ? *User talk:scorpiondevil IMG/Archive — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scorpiondevil (talk • contribs) 16:36, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

I'm not sure what I'm missing or specifically need to do with the images that I uploaded for Joe Esposito (artist). I am creating the article with the artist's consent and help. Specifically, I assume I need to (what?) have Joe Esposito send an email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org stating these files are owned by him?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:JoeEspositoDOCKINVENICE-600x420.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:JoeEspositoCELEBRATION-600x462.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:JoeEspositoCARRIAGESINROMEITALY-600x418.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:JoeEspositoBlackAndWhite-600x513.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:JoeEspositoBELLTOWERVENICEITALY-600x465.jpg

Gary J Hardy (talk) 14:00, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Hi! I provided a link to Penny's facebook profile. If you have any questions about the photo, you can ask her. It has been released into the public domain as indicated. She was sitting beside me when we set the license up. Crackerjack (talk) 23:17, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Alltex EPZ Logo.jpg

• Resent email: Brief - User has obtained verbal approval from company - what proof do I need to submit to Wikipedia - an email confirmation from the respective company? Thanks NGayanP; 19:30 GMT, 15 April 2013

• 

  Hello, ShakespeareFan00/Sfan00 IMG. Please check your email; you've got mail! The subject is File:Alltex EPZ Logo.jpg.
  It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
• Inquiring about the status of the file & what steps should be taken from our side; Thanks NGayanP

You need to forward written confirmation of the permission to the permissions queue. See WP:COPYREQ Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:37, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Ultratumba.jpg listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect File:Ultratumba.jpg. Since you had some involvement with the File:Ultratumba.jpg redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:09, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Uncle Sam.jpg listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect File:Uncle Sam.jpg. Since you had some involvement with the File:Uncle Sam.jpg redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:13, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Yaganti1.jpg listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect File:Yaganti1.jpg. Since you had some involvement with the File:Yaganti1.jpg redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:23, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

File:OnTheGroundsForSculpture.JPG listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect File:OnTheGroundsForSculpture.JPG. Since you had some involvement with the File:OnTheGroundsForSculpture.JPG redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:36, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Winnipeg skyline.jpg listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect File:Winnipeg skyline.jpg. Since you had some involvement with the File:Winnipeg skyline.jpg redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:16, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Photo of Warren Coats.jpg

I am extremely frustrated that this can of worms has been re-opened. All the subject, owner, and me, the article author, have wanted was to make this picture open access. The numerous amount of hours I had spent trying to comply with your byzantine requirements just to achieve this has been astounding and counterproductive. But, we thought we had resolved this months ago, when, working with multiple Wikipedia editors, we made sure that both Warren Coats at the person who snapped the picture, Ito Briones, sent multiple emails giving permission for the photo to be freely accessible. Now you have another problem. Whatever the problem is now, you have the all the information you need proving that the creator of the file has given permission. If there is something incorrect in the tagging, please make the necessary change rather than asking me to re-do instructions that I have tried to follow no less than 10--now 11 times, only to have some editor make some unclear objection and refer me to instructions I thought I already complied with, and then delete the photo. I also submitted a letter of complaint because of this Wikipedia practice and would be happy to share it with you. My main problem, besides the indecipherability of the instructions, for editors so eager to delete files and make referral to the same indecipherable instructions, is that in the time you took to make this determination, could have been spent helping resolve the problem that you now have. If there is something specific I need to do, that hasn't been done already, then please tell me precisely what specific action you want me to take and do not refer me to your general instructions, since I'm obviously not capable of following them. Sorry to be terse, but we were all amazed and outraged before and now it's begun all over again. Odellhuff (talk) 00:41, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

File:YuezhiHeliocles.jpg

I see that you tagged this as possibly being free. The problem is that there is no evidence of permission from the photographer. Photos of coins need permission from the photographer as explained at Commons:COM:ART#Photograph of an old coin found on the Internet. Since someone can take a free photo of the coin, this image fails WP:NFCC#1, and it additionally fails WP:NFCC#10a. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:23, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Queen Tiye - cropped - probably with her husband Amenhotep III - 34 louvre - egyptarchive.JPG

Dear Sfan00: You wrote to me

Thanks for uploading File:Queen Tiye - cropped - probably with her husband Amenhotep III - 34 louvre - egyptarchive.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion. If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:38, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Even though he states on his web site that none is required, I have the written permission of the creator for the use of his copyright-free low resolution images.

"From: Jon Bodsworth <post@egyptarchive.co.uk> Date: Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 2:11 PM Subject: Re: your photographs To: 83d40m coresp

Hi

Yes, that's fine. Use in any way you like.

All the best

Jon

.................

On 16 Nov 2007, at 02:48, 83d40m coresp wrote:

I would like to use your photographs in Wikipedia -- you have indicated that the low resolution images are copyright free and requested an e-mail if used. Please let me know whether you need any other information. Thanks for the availability of your great photographs. -- 83d40m"

Is this a new procedure? _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 01:52, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the confirmation Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:39, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Please see my talk page, I was uncertain what you were asking for, but provided what I guessed you meant. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 02:16, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

File:1906Ultras.jpg listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect File:1906Ultras.jpg. Since you had some involvement with the File:1906Ultras.jpg redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:02, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Alta if.png listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect File:Alta if.png. Since you had some involvement with the File:Alta if.png redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:13, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Älta IF.png listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect File:Älta IF.png. Since you had some involvement with the File:Älta IF.png redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:14, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

File:APC LOGO.jpg listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect File:APC LOGO.jpg. Since you had some involvement with the File:APC LOGO.jpg redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:17, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

File:XingXiu.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:XingXiu.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:21, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Walmart.JPG listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect File:Walmart.JPG. Since you had some involvement with the File:Walmart.JPG redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:25, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Vitor Belfort.jpg listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect File:Vitor Belfort.jpg. Since you had some involvement with the File:Vitor Belfort.jpg redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:31, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Victoria Branesti.png listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect File:Victoria Branesti.png. Since you had some involvement with the File:Victoria Branesti.png redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:48, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Lastpic 4comp2PPLeg Radom-Kielce Jan45.jpg

As in the case of all earlier images from this category, please contact the person to brand this image as non-free and disregard the explicit permission we received from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. I merely received the permission and uploaded the image with appropriate tags. Contact those who changed those tags to some other license and ask them for their rationale. //Halibutt 13:59, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

File:The fox.JPG listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect File:The fox.JPG. Since you had some involvement with the File:The fox.JPG redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:07, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

File:The Boy Is Mine.jpg listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect File:The Boy Is Mine.jpg. Since you had some involvement with the File:The Boy Is Mine.jpg redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:07, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

File:The Boy Is Mine.JPG listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect File:The Boy Is Mine.JPG. Since you had some involvement with the File:The Boy Is Mine.JPG redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:07, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

File:SweetTooth.jpg listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect File:SweetTooth.jpg. Since you had some involvement with the File:SweetTooth.jpg redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:25, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

File:SurvivalOfTheFittest.jpg listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect File:SurvivalOfTheFittest.jpg. Since you had some involvement with the File:SurvivalOfTheFittest.jpg redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:27, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Survivalofthefittest.jpg listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect File:Survivalofthefittest.jpg. Since you had some involvement with the File:Survivalofthefittest.jpg redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:28, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Photo of art

Template:Photo of art has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. ViperSnake151  Talk  14:45, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

IRC Trivia (Week ending 10th Feb 2013)

1. What species is Leptoptilos crumeniferus?

   The Marabou Stork.

2. What species is Alectura lathami?

   An Australian Brushturkey.

3. At what age did golfer Morgan Pressel first qualify for the Women's Open?

   Age 12.

4. Marrus orthocanna is a species of what?

   Siphonophore.

5. In which century did the the Huia become extinct?

   Early 20^th Century.

6. "We Can Do It!" is an American wartime propaganda poster produced by who?

   J. Howard Miller

7. John Jackson lead which Australian squadron in World War II?

   No. 75

8. Russian General Denis Davydov created a specific poetry genre known as what?

   Hussar.

9. On the first ascent of the Cordier Couloir on the Aiguille Verte (pictured), Thomas Middlemore, John Oakley Maund and Henri Cordier were nearly obliterated by what?

   Rockfall

10. Oregon-based Omega Morgan used Dawn dishwashing liquid to move what?

    The Sellwood Bridge.

Signed: John F. Lewis (talk) 23:28, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Masonic books

Duncan's Masonic Ritual and Monitor is fairly well thought of -- in fact, I think parts of it are reprinted in the Maine Masonic Text Book, a supplement to our ciphered ritual. Mackey's Encyclopedia of Freemasonry would be another possibility. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 22:24, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Thank you, I'll see what archive.org brings up on those. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:15, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Berkeley

Hi, an employee of the hotel emailed it to me at like 2000px and I scaled it down. If you validate your email here I can prove it to you.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 23:04, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Erroneous Speedy Deletion Nominations Under CSD F2

Please do not report images as corrupt or empty when they are clearly not. Thank you. --☥NEO (talk) 23:20, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Looking at the page you reverted on, the image does meet F2 and is not an erroneous report. The image is not local, it's a Commons image which has a local (blank) page. The only time we have blank local pages are for instances where they are featured and have been tagged as such, for example. Since there is nothing to keep here on the local level, there's no reason for that page to exist still. Regards, — Moe Epsilon 23:58, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

My sincerest apologies to both of you. --☥NEO (talk) 00:13, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Revenue.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Revenue.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 17:11, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Justin Jones performing at the ACL Music Festival, October 12, 2012.jpg

Thank you for informing me about the photo that was deleted off of the Justin Jones (American singer-songwriter) wiki page. Just to clarify, if I get the person who created the file to use the template given on this page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:CONSENT Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries and grant us permission to use the file, will it be put back on the page? Please let me know. thank you NickV930 (talk) 20:36, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

It should, although if the image is free it should be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons :) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:40, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Wstext

A tag has been placed on Template:Wstext requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page, where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:14, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	Good catch with File:Department of Further Education Employment Science Technology.jpeg LGA talkedits 00:35, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Request for information

Thank you for responding to my uncertainty about the eligibility of four files for migration to Commons. For my guidance, I would appreciate an indication here of the reasons for the ineligibility of the files: 1, 2,3, and 4 Esoglou (talk) 19:09, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

I want images I uploaded removed from Wikipedia.

The reason I removed the fair use rationale on the File:Bfs lp corr.JPG and File:Inthebeginningbeatles.jpg is because I have severed my ties with The Beatles Wikipedia group as a result of losing a major long standing editing dispute. Please take steps in getting these images WHICH I UPLOADED removed from Wikipedia. Steelbeard1 (talk) 13:19, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

That's not an excuse for edit-warring. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:20, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

But I STILL want the images removed. How can this be done? Steelbeard1 (talk) 13:22, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

It can't. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:23, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

IT HAS BEEN DONE!!!! One way is for someone else to remove the images from articles to make the images orphaned. Look up the image pages to see which articles have the images then remove them. As I already stated I CANNOT do this myself as I publicly declared that I am no longer editing Beatle related articles, but you can. Steelbeard1 (talk) 13:26, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

So you are asking me to remove 'useful' images from an article because you couldn't get on with other contributors?. I don't think so. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:28, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

I have done this successfully with my image of the contents of The Beatles Collection box set by removing the fair use rationale. Steelbeard1 (talk) 13:29, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

BTW, do you prefer "The Beatles" or "the Beatles"? That was the core of the long standing editing dispute. "The Beatles" is a registered trade mark of Apple Corps Ltd. Steelbeard1 (talk) 13:31, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

F2 exemptions

Please take note. Wikipedia:CSD#F2:

This also includes image description pages for Commons images, except pages containing categories or information not relevant to any other project (like {{FeaturedPicture}}.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 14:22, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Heera aur pathar.jpg

An IP removed the deletion tag from the image. I have restored the deletion tag and so have restored the caption notices to the image on each article it is used in. --Geniac (talk) 00:38, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, ShakespeareFan00. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Bot_requests.
Message added by Theopolisme at 03:51, 30 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

'Nother one. —Theopolisme (talk) 14:42, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

47North (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Horror, Agent, Hugo, Paul Jones, Sinner, Technomancer, Dave Duncan and Chris Roberson

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Unstable

Template:Unstable has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:40, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ir-Roadsign

Template:Ir-Roadsign has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:49, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Commonsmaydelete

Template:Commonsmaydelete has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:54, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Justin Meyer.jpg

Just delete the darned thing. What is the point in restoring a rationale I removed and templating me over an image I want deleted and know has been replaced by a free image?? Have some sense!♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 16:22, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Little Mix files

I can't understand why do you inform me about files that I did not upload. Eurofan2005 (talk) 13:42, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Mentmorehannahinhall.jpg

Thank you for adding structure to the File:Mentmorehannahinhall.jpg page on Wikipedia. However you ought really to look at the templates you are using as they don't seem at all appropriate to the image. You added the template {{bsr}} which makes the assertion "... it either links directly to the image or is a generic base URL, or is not an Internet source for an image that was likely found on the Internet." Leaving aside the use of 'either' to precede three options, it's pretty clear that the source information for the image of the watercolour painted circa 1863 is not a direct link to the image; it is not a generic base URL; and it is not likely found on the internet, as Giano is quite well-known for taking his own photos or scans. So why is that template there?

In addition, you templated Giano, the uploader of the image, with the following: "If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright." Why would he need to do this? He says the watercolour, a two-dimensional work of art, was painted circa 1863 and is now in the public domain, so the image is perforce in the public domain also. Is that not sufficient clarification of the copyright status? --RexxS (talk) 22:12, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

If it's his own scan it should say so. Tag removed. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:13, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Tagging File:Frederick md seal.png

You tagged this file for deletion because it lacks author information, but the image is, by definition, in the public domain. It wasn't PD released, it simply is, and therefore the authorship is immaterial to confirming its copyright status. Please remove the tag as invalid. VanIsaac_{WS Vex}^contribs 14:25, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

CSD tags

Why don't you do whatever needs to be done to fix the upload form for non-free works before you go tagging them like a madman. Ryan Vesey 00:13, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

I would, if I had the information to hand, but as I didn't upload the image I don't know you reasoning. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:15, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

The upload form for non-free works doesn't include anything for NFCC 1 or 2. I'm not about to be bothered to go around to the images filling it in. If you legitimately feel that the image doesn't meet the guidelines, go ahead and bring it up at the relevant noticeboard, but your time would be better spent finding whoever you have to find to fix the upload form so it has a field for criteria 1 and 2. Ryan Vesey 00:18, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

So you are criticising the tools, for not providing the ability to add these? Surely you check the rationale you've provided for the images you've uploaded? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:19, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Furthermore, specific options (i.e. a historical portrait) do have fields for NFCC 2. Note that File:Cambria logo.png isn't blank for NFCC 1 and 2, it says NA. There is no reason to expect the uploaders to provide a rationale for something that needs none. Ryan Vesey 00:22, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Minnesota Twins 10.png

As it says on the page, it was derived from several other similar drawings made by wikipedians. File:Minnesota Twins 3.png, for example. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 00:29, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Which specfic files? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 07:23, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

You mean I should list the specific files I borrowed from in creating that sketch? As I recall, I took the 1 from the 14, and then concocted the 0 from the second digit of either the 28 or the 29. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 10:48, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

I added links to the files which I cobbled together to create the "10". Let me know if that is still insufficient. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 02:04, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image queries

Thank you for your messages.[1] I've added a source (Commons) and author (the Met) to the cropped version of The Death of Socrates, and corrected the link to the source of the Saba photos.

Reading those fair use criteria you pointed me to, it looks like I can only justify fair use of one picture of Saba. Would that be your view? --Anthonyhcole (talk · contribs · email) 03:02, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

If you feel they aren't justified, it's up to you. I'm remaining neutral. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 07:25, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

You've got more experience with images than me. It's not important that Umberto Saba has photos of the man, but it would be nice. It would tell the reader something about him that text alone could not. There aren't any images in the public domain, to my knowledge. I got those three from an Italian gallery website, which I've linked to in the images' history. The pictures are of him as a child, at his creative prime, and in his later years, receiving a very special award. Can you give me your opinion as to whether using them as I have is fair use please? --Anthonyhcole (talk · contribs · email) 13:07, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Descriptions added

Hello! Thanks for the talk page message. Have added most of the descriptions :) YuviPanda (talk) 12:15, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar

Your contributions to the filespace are second to none. I constantly run across you cleaning up files that are on my watchlist/to-do list. I've noticed your especially amazing work in almost completely eliminating the backlog at Category:Wikipedia files lacking a description. It was 7000 images in 2011, I tried to get it down to 5000, and now its down to under 600 total, mostly thanks to you! Keep up the good work, even though it often goes unnoticed. :) -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 17:14, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

What's wrong with that ref?

re: [2]. And you may want to explain this to the newbie editor who added it, too. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 15:55, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

When I tried to add it it tripped the spam filter. I have no objections to it's reinstatment. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:46, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Masu external link

The link you added to Masu (Japanese) gives an error. I haven't deleted it yet to give you a chance to fix as I can see it probably was supposed to be to something okay but I can't figure out exactly what. Dmcq (talk) 17:44, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

All I did was add a reflist. - If the reference is linking to the wrong place, then that was not expectedSfan00 IMG (talk) 14:45, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Minor barnstar
	Thanks for putting up the descriptions on the image Mario_santoro.jpg Nischayn22 (talk) 21:29, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion for my photo

What does packing artwork mean and why is the photograph consider for speedy deletion? OliwierB (talk) 21:24, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

• What Sfan almost certainly means by his unhelpfully opaque deletion nomination is that your image is a derivative work of the copyrighted artwork on the packaging. Because it is a derivative of a copyrighted work, it cannot be released under a free license. If it were illustrating an article then it might be usable under fair use terms, but as it isn't we cannot keep it. See Wikipedia:FAQ/Copyright, particularly the Derivative works section. Thryduulf (talk) 01:26, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Inaccurate copyright addition to File:Transport Coast Farmer AWM.jpg has been reverted

Undid your revision to Transport Coast Farmer AWM.jpg because your qualification "NOT necessarily in the public domain in the United States" does not apply as will clearly be seen if you read the citations. An image, stated by the Australian government as being public domain is in the public domain and the qualification of "entered the public domain in Australia prior to 1996" is certainly met by a WW II image. A bit of reading before modifying such important things as copyright might be in order. Palmeira (talk) 22:06, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Looks like my mistake. Sorry, just getting a bit tired of some "copyright police" with only vague ideas of the actual issues or mindless bots tagging things. You apparently just added the Australian notice template that contains the qualification and I had just done a blind cut 'n paste adding "' to ' | commons}}"! Palmeira (talk) 22:21, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Please stop.

Over at WT:CSD, we're having to clean up after a mess you've made before and keep making. Files that are categorically ineligible for copyright - ie, tagged with {{pd-ineligible}}, {{pd-text}}, {{pd-shape}}, {{pd-chem}}, and {{pd-textlogo}} - do not need sourcing information to determine copyright. It is extremely disruptive to have to clean up after your erroneous deletion tags. Please do not ever again tag categorically public domain images for speedy deletion because they lack superfluous source information. VanIsaac_{WS Vex}^contribs 00:03, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Please update the guidelines for CSD then. You should note that after a concern was raised this time I've tried to place a good faith source in a number of images. 09:50, 20 April 2013 (UTC)Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:16, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

The CSD criteria is quite clear. "Media files that lack the necessary licensing information to verify copyright status may be deleted". These files just plain do not require sourcing to do so, and are not eligible for CSD. I've updated the documentation on the tagging template to be more explicit about this, but when you tag a file for deletion - or whatever variant on the idea {{di-no source}} would be - you are responsible for assuring that it legitimately applies. VanIsaac_{WS Vex}^contribs 20:06, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

File:SelimDjem.jpg

Not that it really matters because the article it was uploaded for has been deleted, but doesnt the OTRS ticket cover the copyright information etc.? -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 21:53, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

It should.. If you can find an OTRS permissions queue volunteer, encourage them to add the source data. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:55, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Reflinks

Would you please slow down and check the edits you are making with reflinks, rather than counting on others to clean up the mess behind you? You surely cannot have checked this edit to Wreck diving or you'd have spotted that the script was giving a completely inappropriate entry for the author field. In that single minute you edited 8 different articles and 47 references. There is no way that you're exercising proper care at that rate and you need to seriously reconsider what you're doing before this escalates. --RexxS (talk) 00:33, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Noted., and I am reviewing the edits made using that tool. I'm finding a number of concerns, so thanks for your notification. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:34, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Tagging unused images

If you're going to be tagging unused images for deletion on the grounds that there's insufficient metadata to determine the subject of the image, then -- a) I strongly suggest you first verify the other edits made by the uploader on the date that the file was uploaded, which can often have all the descriptive metadata you need. Admittedly, sometimes this requires looking in the deleted edits, which only admins can do, but more often it's available. b) "image does not assert notability of it's subject" should not have an apostrophe. "Its" != "It's". "It's" is short for "It is". DS (talk) 14:42, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

In a number of cases, meta-data examaniation was being done, albiet perhaps not very rigorusly.Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:44, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, ShakespeareFan00. You have new messages at Wikipedia:OTRS noticeboard.
Message added 15:09, 25 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

ukexpat (talk) 15:09, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Already noted, and the images there updated with a note Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:21, 25 April 2013 (UTC).

Eve McVeagh in "Snafu"

You approved this picture for the commons last week. I have tried to move it myself but have been unable to. Would you mind helping me out when you have a chance and moving it. I am very frustrated with the Commons and I am sure it is something easy, but I can not figure out what I am doing wrong...BestDrPRCA (talk) 01:19, 26 April 2013 (UTC)DrPRCA

File:Logo_of_The_Lace_Guild,_blue.png

This image was uploaded before permission was granted by the Chairman of The Lace Guild. She has now sent me this permission in an email. Could you tell me to whom I should forward it please. Socialambulator (talk) 21:56, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

See -Wikipedia:COPYREQ#Consent_letter 80.176.129.180 (talk) 01:01, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, ShakespeareFan00. You have new messages at Tom Morris's talk page.
Message added 12:57, 30 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

—Tom Morris (talk) 12:57, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Alg-51st-queens-jpeg.jpeg

Hi Sfan00, I noticed that you removed the fair use dispute template from this image, but I don't understand your reasoning. The uploader indicated that the image was fair use because it was being used to "illustrate either the publication of the article or issue in question". This image is not being used to illustrate the Daily News, an article in the Daily News, or an issue of the Daily News. What was your rationale for removing the tag? Pburka (talk) 17:37, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

The image is not of anything to do with the Daily News, per the FUR currently on the page, the Daily News is listed SOLELY as being the source of the image. That the image is 'replaceable' isn't disputed. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 07:28, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

The uploader indicated that the image was being used to illustrate the Daily News. Given that it doesn't do so, I think that's a valid reason for deletion. However, as you point out, it's also replaceable, and, in fact, Wikipedia already has nearly identical free images. Pburka (talk) 07:33, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

NtShutdownSystem

I've moved your request into a prod, as that reason isn't a valid one at CSD. It's a rather restricted area, CSD, and only certain things come into it. We are widening it, a bit at a time, but it's an uphill battle... Peridon (talk) 17:37, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Score extension apparently now considered stable!

There is a new mediawiki extension! the Score extension allows you to enter music (using Lillypond or ABC notation) directly into Mediawiki pages! What's more it has an option for generating an asociated OGG file automatically.

It would be appreciated if you were willing to look over the notes for the extension and given your considerable experience in sequencing examples, consider migrating over to it for the numerous examples you have contributed over a number of years :) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:48, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Uluburun shipwreck nude.jpg

I noticed you tagged this image for wrong license. What's the problem? It's a recent (presumably copyrighted) photo of a 3-D archaeological statuette. ?? --Pete Tillman (talk) 17:26, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

It was tagged because it's showing up as a conflicted license. Either the image is free (and suitable for Commons) or it isn't

free media. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:28, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

I still don't see the conflict. The work is obviously PD, but the photo isn't. Hence the fair-use license. Unless I'm missing something? I did CE out a superfluous subhead. --Pete Tillman (talk) 22:10, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

I notice that

you were working on the copyright status of File:HHSeverenceHall.jpg and I wanted to let you know that I removed your, and perhaps other editors, tags and replaced it with a new one. Just letting you know. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 14:33, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Belmont Veterans Memorial Pier-1.JPG

I'm not sure what you found wrong with my photograph but I uploaded a replacement, I hope this solves the issue. Exiled in California (talk) 19:18, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

May 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2007 EB26 may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:16, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of awards received by Celine Dion may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:21, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Roorkee may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:34, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Lee Myung-bak may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:38, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Royal New South Wales Regiment may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:37, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

File:MATTER logo.png listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect File:MATTER logo.png. Since you had some involvement with the File:MATTER logo.png redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Sfan00 IMG (talk) 06:48, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Matter logo.png listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect File:Matter logo.png. Since you had some involvement with the File:Matter logo.png redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Sfan00 IMG (talk) 06:50, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Misdirected message and MAJOR apologies

You'd think I'd learn not to stay up after midnight, but Wiki is Sooo distracting. Your name was above theirs. I redirected and softened tone, per your response. As soon as I saw all your stars, I wondered how such a mistake could happen. Duh. It didn't. Thanks for the fix. AnEyeSpy (talk) 07:10, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Your message is misidrected. The only edit I can find was the closure of a reference tag. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:15, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Free or non-free logo

Regarding this edit, why do you think the image is not properly licensed? It's a logo that might be protected by copyright. It's just about impossible to predict what logos would be judged eligible and which would not... In this example, the Credit Card City logo was deemed eligible but the related CCC logo was not. In the end it's up to a judge and rather arbitrary. Isn't it best to keep it tagged as non-free, since there's no way for us to know for sure? – Quadell ^(talk) 01:24, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

It sounds like you're not convinced the image has the wrong license tag here. If so, I'm going to remove the {{wrong license}} tag, if you don't mind. You can nominate it for deletion at Commons if you want, but I doubt it will be deleted. After all, it would probably be deemed ineligible for copyright in a U.S. court... we just have no way to know for sure. In these edge cases (probably PD-ineligible, but not 100% sure), Commons tends to keep them, since it's probably safe. But here on en-wiki, we tend to tag them as non-free, on the principle that we use the safest tag possible that still allows us to use the image. I know, it seems odd that the same image might be tagged differently here and on the Commons, but that happens. Different consensuses result in different communities after all. It might seem more consistent to tag an image the same way in both places, but to be honest, there's no way either of us can ever know for sure that the logo is or is not protected by copyright. We just make our best guess and move on. (Besides, it's a Brazilian image, and I have even less of an idea what a Brazilian judge would decide.)

If you think wider discussion is needed, you could retag it as free and then nominate it at PUI... I wouldn't mind. But I don't think it's worth the trouble, honestly. All the best, – Quadell ^(talk) 14:16, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Fair enough Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:17, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello, ShakespeareFan00. You have new messages at Debresser's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

A barnstar for you!

	The Civility Barnstar
	Thanks for your correction and kindness AnEyeSpy (talk) 07:12, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Move image "Inductive_proofs_of_properties_of_add,_mult_from_recursive_definitions.pdf" to Commons

Hi! You suggested to move my image "Inductive_proofs_of_properties_of_add,_mult_from_recursive_definitions.pdf" to Wikipedia Commons. I agree with that, but I have difficulties to perform the move. Wikipedia:Moving_images_to_the_Commons#Transferring_manually suggest to download the image and to upload it to Commons. However, the Wizard for the latter task never worked from my laptop (which was the reason for uploading locally to Wikipedia only). If you can perform the move yourself, please do it. Best regards Jochen Burghardt (talk) 20:01, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Invitation to a Wicnic in Gainesville on Saturday, June 22nd

Greetings!

Seeing that you've edited the article on Gainesville on Wikipedia, I'm inviting to the North Central Florida 2013 Great American Wiknic that will be on Saturday June 22, 2013, commencing at 1:00 pm, ten blocks north of UF campus in Gainesville,.

If you're able and inclined to come, please RSVP at at this URL.

Type to you later, Vincent J. Lipsio (talk) 20:26, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

File:2001 South Pacific Mini Games Logo.png

Hi. I know that copyright issues are important, not only for Wikipedia. I used the Upload Wizard to upload the non-free logo, and to my opinion, all points of the Non-free use rationale logo are fulfilled and addressed, (as asked by the upload wizard). So I do not understand what exactly is missing. Could you please explain in detail. Thanks. CroesJ (talk) 21:06, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, but I still try to understand the problem, but do not succeed. I am convinced that the upload of the logo for the 2001 South Pacific Mini Games is in accordance with Wikipedia's guidelines for uploading non-free logos.

I read again through Wikipedia:Non-free_content, especially through Wikipedia:Non-free_content#Implementation and Template:Non-free use rationale logo. As far as I understand, the information that you request is not part of the non-free rationale as used for non-free logos.

For some reason, Wikipedia:File Upload Wizard, as used for the logo upload, generates a description page of style Template:Non-free use rationale 2 rather than Template:Non-free use rationale logo with the points you mention marked as "not applicable".

Is the point that you want me to modify the logo's description page to the style of Template:Non-free use rationale logo? CroesJ (talk) 18:39, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Stylized porn.png

Since you've added the info template to File:Stylized porn.png, I was wondering if you could split the file in two, since there are two images in the history, both potentially usable. -- 70.24.245.196 (talk) 22:32, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Khiladi_786_SoHaM.jpg

Thank You. Please check your mail.

Hello, ShakespeareFan00/Sfan00 IMG. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Move to commons

Hi, why did you removed the "move to Commons" tag from File:Latham-J-C-1919.jpg? I don't see the image on Commons yet. The image shouldn't be deleted from en.wiki afterwards because of the KeepLocal tag. Garion96 (talk) 20:23, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

The Move to Commons tag was removed because of the Keep Local Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:27, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Keep local prohibits the actual deleting of the image because the image also being on Commons. It doesn't prohibit moving (or actually copying) the image. Garion96 (talk) 20:30, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:MuammarGaddafiandAmazon.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:MuammarGaddafiandAmazon.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 09:49, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

No objections Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:51, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:NFUR not needed

A tag has been placed on Template:NFUR not needed requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page, where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:19, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Somewhat confused by your actions — you tagged Template:NFUR not needed and Template:Nfur not needed for speedy deletion, and then you thanked me for de-tagging them. Did you click the wrong button one of those times? I didn't understand your tagging in the first place, so I'll not be surprised if I'm overlooking something that should be obvious. Nyttend (talk) 22:45, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

I read your argument as to why it should not be deleted:) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:49, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Maybe free media

Template:Maybe free media has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:21, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Mfm

A tag has been placed on Template:Mfm, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Redirect targetting template not used in a useful manner.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:22, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello, ShakespeareFan00. You have new messages at Aggie80's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Why?

Why would anyone want to move this file to commons? It is just an Image to decorate my essays on english Wikipedia. It reads "Mrt3366 post", How does it need a move to commons? Mr T^{(Talk?) (New thread?)} 09:49, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Are you saying it's out of scope? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:51, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

I am asking you what did you see in this image to nominate it for a move to commons? I am saying its use is inherently very limited and no real need to waste any server space by moving it to commons. Mr T^{(Talk?) (New thread?)} 13:16, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

It was 'free' Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:22, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

permission

you've sent me a notification concerning Dark Eyes (2012 album).jpg. I've already sent the permission email twice which I was given by the record label. You guys a quite bad at this sometimes.. How about sending me an email back with the information I should put? By all means, you want to take it down. Go for it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by David.palmer99 (talk • contribs) 12:36, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Nina Manuel From The IIFA Awards 2006 Day 4.jpg

I'm not really sure about the permission for this file. I used the "File:Jiah Khan at Nokia APP party 02.jpg" image's licensing as the source website is the same. Its licensing states that "This image is owned by www.bollywoodhungama.com (formerly named "IndiaFM"). All photographs used by this site from Bollywood Hungama parties/events with the exception of screenshots, wallpapers or promotional posters are exclusively created by their own photographers. Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify these images, providing the site is attributed and a direct link running to the source on their site is provided." I tried to use the same template at that file page, but it turned up as a red link. So I put the same permission that was used (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0), but without the message that the "File:Jiah Khan at Nokia APP party 02.jpg" image has. BigJolly9 (talk) 21:53, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

File:ChadZumock.jpg

You tagged this file as eligible for transfer to Commons. I already tried to transfer this file, both the original and cropped versions, last week. However, the resulting Commons transfer (same name as en.wiki file) only included the cropped version. Is this why you re-tagged the file for transfer? How can I transfer the earlier version? Thanks. Levdr1lp / talk 04:12, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

RNDeer Entire Logo Permissions

The creator/owner of the image has sent email granting permissions to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Should the 'Evidence of Permission' tag be removed from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:RNDeer_Entire_Logo.jpg ? I'm not sure what else I'm expected to do to verify permission of the image. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tricky9981 (talk • contribs) 15:59, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Subduction01.jpg

Hi Sfan, I tagged File:Subduction01.jpg as obsolete last year after I uploaded File:Subduction.png to replace it, so it should probably be deleted as well as it's only used on two user pages. Mikenorton (talk) 12:08, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Yachtingmed.jpg

This file is in the public domain because its copyright has expired in the United States and those countries with a copyright term of no more than the life of the author plus 100 years.

No need to delete. Copyright expired. 178.197.254.3 (talk) 21:40, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

File source problem with File:BalfourCurrie1.jpg

You will note that I have updated the source information as requested. Also, I noticed a more appropriate license and have applied that as well. Cheers. Neutiquam (talk) 06:12, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Castle icons

I don't know what you were trying to do to West Yorkshire, but it didn't work (I reverted). Have you done the same elsewhere? If so, please find and fix. Thanks. PamD 07:58, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Checking :) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:14, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Sue Snell for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sue Snell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sue Snell (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Thanks, Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 07:59, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Correct License

Dear Sfan00 IMG, Thank you for your message on my talk page. I am having a hard time figuring out correct license for the pictures I post to the page of "Senator Ishaq Dar". I would like you to understand my position and advise me of the right way to deal with this problem once and for all so I don't have this issue.

The pictures that I post are owned by the political party "PMLN" in which Senator Dar is a senior leader. The photos are sent to me directly from the official photographer Mr. Balti for me to use the way I want to. Now, is there any email or etc. that I can ask the party or Mr. Balti to send me that authorizes me to use those pictures? I would highly appreciate if you can let me know a way in which I don't have this issue in future.

Your help would be HIGHLY APPRECIATED. Thank you and regards,

Pakistani88 (talk) 08:49, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

You will need to get that political party to mail in a permission for use og the images, see

WP:COPYREQ Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:16, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks Pakistani88 (talk) 18:26, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

keep/transfer to wikicommon

Can you point me to the Wikipedia policy which requires tagging of images uploaded to wikipedia as either keep local or transfer to wikipedia commons. I've been seeing these tags added some lately and it is unclear where this is coming from.--RadioFan (talk) 11:42, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

There is no specfic policy as such, It's just good practice to mark images that are 'free' as either being for Commons, or local. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:43, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Your recent comments on one of my images implied that this is policy. There are 3 choices here, mark it for transfer to commons, mark it as keep here, and leave it alone. --RadioFan (talk) 23:42, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Penelope washing stripe off.png

You're gay. I made the fucking image myself, douchebag.

I love anthropomorphism! 20:28, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Celtic spiral tile pattern.png

It's quite useless to add an Information to an image description page if you leave important fields blank (especially when there's information available to fill them in). AnonMoos (talk) 21:03, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

File:JDHS Logo 60Years.png

You have added info that this can be move to commons, if it will moved, after then in commons will need OTRS-permission, and I think that this logo will deleted because Only text only logos are allowed in Commons without OTRS-permission Musamies (talk) 02:07, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

File:MarkFraryAimingHigh.jpg

I've marked this image as missing evidence of permission because I couldn't find any evidence that the author himself designed the cover or that he released the image into the public domain. I noticed you marked it as safe to move to the Commons, so I was wondering if you knew something that I didn't. ALH (talk) 03:52, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Folies Bergere after renovatation of facade 2013.jpg

I have removed the {{mtc}} from this file on the off chance that someone on commons decides to delete it as there is no prof the architecture is out of copyright. LGA _talk^edits 08:25, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

File:The Siege of sparta.jpg

Could you clarify on the file's talk page what's missing? It's a 2D work of art long in the public domain, and would seem to be covered by a mere photograph of an out-of-copyright two-dimensional work may not be protected under American copyright law. The official position of the Wikimedia Foundation is that all reproductions of public domain works should be considered to be in the public domain regardless of their country of origin. If the painting is correctly identified, then it would seem not to matter what the immediate source of the image is. Cynwolfe (talk) 04:08, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

The request for the immediate source is so that the Gallery/Museum that took the digital image can be credited , but your reasoning has been taken into conisderation.Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:05, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Flagging images for transfer

Hello! Please be more careful when tagging images for transfer to commons, as you flagged both File:Green Dragon Sprite.jpg and File:Black Dragon Sprite.gif when they are in fact copyrighted images from Dragon Quest and Final Fantasy, respectively. Google's reverse image search can be helpful when checking for these things! --TKK ^{bark !} 02:16, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

And again with File:Collins College Expansion Project.jpg --TKK ^{bark !} 02:21, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Aaaand again with File:Joanne Langione Dance Center Logo.gif. I'm going to stop alerting them to you now; just be more careful when flagging images for transfer in the future. --TKK ^{bark !} 02:26, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

I was working in good faith based on the information provided here on Wikipedia.

That you are able to spot old game sprites is a good thing, and I would suggest you continue. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:16, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

It's fine, I just thought you should know. I didn't recognize the sprites, I copied their urls and plugged them into Google's search by image and the originals came up. --TKK ^{bark !} 10:50, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Wow, you sure did

discover File:Felicitas Goodman and student, ca. 1988.jpg quickly, I just uploaded it yesterday. I have had trouble - not copyright sort of trouble but uploading problems -putting pictures on Commons so I don't even try any more. I live on a dead-end, one way alley far off the internet superhighway that many other editors travel on and the whole time and ease-of-action issues are different out here. I had that particular shot because the "student" in the picture is a very rare picture of my wife to be found on the www. Anyway I wanted to acknowledge the great work that you do in the image arena of wikipedia. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 13:59, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Usernameexpand

Template:Usernameexpand has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:50, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

File:City-of-Gilroy-seal.svg

It's not a government seal. It's an original work of art. If you overlay this image on the original, assuming you could even find one, you'll find that they don't coincide. You didn't read my comments in the image talk page where I explain how this image came about, did you? I'd appreciate it if you weren't so quick to shoot and ask questions later. — Quicksilver^{T @} 19:37, 25 June 2013 (UTC)