I am part of a course taught by Wiki Education that trains scholars in how to edit Wikipedia. Learn more at wikiedu.org. All of my contributions are my own and I take responsibility for them.

Welcome...

Hello, Shaftesbury'sPipe, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask a question on your talk page.  Again, welcome! ProfGray (talk) 19:01, 6 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

This feels a little bit like 4th grade with a secret decoder ring! But I am really happy to be part of this project and looking forward to tomorrow! Shaftesbury'sPipe (talk) 19:41, 6 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks

edit

Thanks for your edits on Comstock Laws, the page really needed them. JuxtaposedJacob (talk) 20:14, 15 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you so much. I'm going to work on this in the next few days to get the rest looking better. There are a LOT of page views and it is something that should be clear! Shaftesbury'sPipe (talk) 21:59, 15 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Comstock and abortion

edit

In Talk:Comstock Act of 1873, you wrote: "I had trouble editing this page because Comstock WAS a law about X, Y, Z then it was amended to be about X,Y. Now it is being talked about as having power to regulate abortion."

Comstock has always been about restricting abortion (along with other things)... this was just a moot point while Roe v. Wade was in effect. Fabrickator (talk) 18:43, 13 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

I completely agree -- abortion has always been EXPLICITLY in the statute and one of its main purposes. I agree that this article has to demonstrate WHY Comstock was related to abortion -- and is now relevant because of Dobbs. If you can do any editing here, it would be very helpful! Shaftesbury'sPipe (talk) 19:49, 13 June 2024 (UTC)Reply