User talk:SergiSmiler/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

June 2013

Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to We Can't Stop because it did not appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Widr (talk) 11:19, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Lil-unique1. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Killer Love, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 23:23, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

August 2013

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Hall of Fame (Big Sean album). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. STATic message me! 19:16, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

October 2013

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Bangerz (album), without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. STATic message me! 15:13, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Future (rapper). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. STATic message me! 16:50, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Future discography, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. STATic message me! 02:35, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bangerz Tour, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Columbus and Madonna (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

November 2013

This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Bangerz (album), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. STATic message me! 00:26, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Your Miley Cyrus Sprint Center edit was purely advertisement for your favorite artist. It wasn't of vital importance. It wasn't the first or last show of the tour nor did she film\record it.

December 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ericsson Globe may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• |}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:46, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

• thanks for the info and input, but it is solved, thanks

Miley Cyrus discography

Please stop your disruptive editing. The articles have a standart. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Miley Cyrus discography, you may be blocked from editing. stop just copying and pasting incorrect information into this article. you are removing correct formatting, reliable sources and other info. Louis Erisson (talk) 01:17, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

• Well, I'll stop when they stop deleting my contributions, wikipedia because some people erases me the good things about Miley! is clear that the poor want to leave! you can tell because I deleted things that are true?

This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Bangerz (album), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please see WP:CITE and WP:V and especially do not inflate sales figures without a reliable source. STATic message me! 17:28, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

• Why did not then? very nice answer to question no wing? ... Shame .... stop being so reluctant to Miley for once, please ...

Stop adding those certifications. Per WP:DISCOGSTYLE, we "list only those certifications which were earned in the countries for which we're showing chart peaks.". You've been warned by other users but you still keep removing that. Just stop, Wikipedia is not yours. There are guidelines to be followed. Decodet (talk) 20:11, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 Month for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.   Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 18:09, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

I want to be unlocked please...

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SergiSmiler (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Am I blocked by saying that "Real & True" of Miley and Future is an issue R&B? really, leave me speechless ... just try to let Miley items in beautiful condition and ... This lock does not make any sense, if I would unlock me a favor, because I'm not doing any crime or vandalism!I just try to add real information! See if they realize I'm not what you think, I bring things almost every day! Please get out of this lock, because to not do anything wrong after all ...

Decline reason:

I wonder if part of your problem may be the limitations of your English as demonstrated in your request. You may not be able to understand exactly what you're doing wrong. Have you considered editing the Wikipedia in your native language until your English improves. — Daniel Case (talk) 18:56, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SergiSmiler (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Sorry to be so annoying, but I want to be unlocked please ... I did nothing wrong, I just want to let Wikipedia / Miley in good condition ... that is comprehensive and well done ... please remove the block, I will not be so heavy ... thanks ...

Decline reason:

I agree with Daniel Case, here. You have not addressed the reasons for your unblock, either. From what you're saying, it sounds like you will go back to making the same edits you are already in trouble for. only (talk) 17:06, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SergiSmiler (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

What reasons do you want me to ? I want to continue contributing to Wikipedia ! I do not want to bother or anything, just want to get the items associated with Miley Cyrus on Wikipedia are made well, and to know that I did nothing wrong to be treated this way ... I have not done anything except work on improving these articles. I 'm learning every day a little bit about how to improve , and I try, but if you hate me or something and do not want to continue here , you're not going to get anything ... I want to contribute to Wikipedia is well done ! there is nothing wrong with that ! My reasons for me remove this lock are very clear , but it clearly does not want to work ... but I feel like I lose, I want to be unlocked please! I just want to put real things in the articles of Miley! being a fan of hers I've made ​​a lot of good information , and with correct references !

I only ask to be unlocked to be able to continue improving Wikipedia, I know sometimes I am heavy, but often do not pay heed ... I just want to work , I'm no criminal and I'm not doing any kind of vandalism in the web ... Please remove the block... thanks

Decline reason:

Reading your comments below, I do not believe that you can contribute well on the English Wikipedia based on the language barrier. Your comments suggest you do not plan to avoid the behavior taht you have been demonstrating either. only (talk) 16:35, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• AHH! I know that my English is not good! but there are some others who assist you? to help! I have often since then things have been fixed! and that's it, nothing happens, we have to help each other, but ... bad we ...

Anyway, once admit, you do not want to remove the lock! I do not want you here! you if this is true, you have a problem ... I hope to really make mistakes ... I just want to help complete things Miley ... Please remove the block ... I will not be so heavy nor borrare important contributions of other editors ...

---

It's not clear you actually understand the problem, however, and as others have noted there may be a language barrier here (your command of English isn't all that great). Not to mention that it's those precise edits that have gotten you blocked. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 21:43, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

It's clear from 17Dec entries that you were also edit warring over this edit https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Miley_Cyrus_discography&diff=next&oldid=586532723 - which you reverted 4 times in a day - totally against our policies. The standard method of editing should be WP:BRD - Bold, revert, discuss - not repeated bold, revert until you get your own way. I see no need to unblock at this time. I suggest you use your block time usefully to understand how Wikipedia works - I will add a list of useful links at the top of this page.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 02:00, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

---

• First, I know my English is bad, I use the Google translator ... anyway ...
• Second: I know what is the problem, I make many changes, I delete things, etc ... But because many times you borráis mine! and also many things that I restart in the articles are true, but do not mind ... you just want a series of things you is this ... so I collaborate on Wikipedia! I collaborate with the Spanish, but seeing what this comprehensive English, I wanted to work ...

Anyway, I understand why my block, I'm too heavy, I change things constantly, but because I care! I want this done right! complete!

• Final: please remove the block ... I just want to help improve Wikipedia ...

Disambiguation link notification for January 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Marc Jacobs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Sims (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

• Thank you for your thanks! Finally someone thanks me!

By the way, fix what you said, I did, but already solved.

Orphaned non-free image File:Miley Cyrus Live MTV EMA 2013.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Miley Cyrus Live MTV EMA 2013.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Adabow (talk) 19:28, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

• Thanks, but I need help.

I used the photo for the article Wrecking Ball, and it has been deleted, said that I break something, can you fix it? I do not understand what has happened.

Thanks

March 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at List of awards and nominations received by Miley Cyrus. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Do not add non notable awards per WP:INDISCRIMINATE LADY LOTUS • TALK 17:55, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:52, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Oh ... okay, I get it, thanks for the advice, I really did not know how and why he did not, but now will try to add it, thanks! (SergiSmiler (talk) 17:46, 23 March 2014 (UTC)) :)

Language barrier

I don't say this to be disrespectful or rude but I think with the language barrier and your English being what it is, I think the best thing to do would be if you want to make an edit, request it on the article's talk page and let another editor make the edit. Your last edit on Miley Cyrus's page was very hard to understand as are a lot of your edits. LADY LOTUS • TALK 17:16, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

That is because they do not speak English and use the google translator, but anyway, I think not so bad, my English is basic I think it means a little, well I think I will do that, the first thing I will put in page of discussion, but I want the reply soon, otherwise it will be a Loss Pack this time, thanks( SergiSmiler (talk) 17:31, 28 March 2014 (UTC) )

Disambiguation link notification for April 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tammin Sursok, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joe Brooks (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Oh, thanks for the comment. With regard to that page, I honestly had no idea that had happened, I will correct it now, thanks.--SergiSmiler (talk) 13:44, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

List of awards and nominations received by Britney Spears

WP:BURDEN and WP:RS are quite clear on this: once I removed the material because of it being potentially false and definitely unsourced, it is forbidden to restore it until sources are found. Feel free to find sources and add back anything you can find sources for, but do not add the material back until you have found the sources.—Kww(talk) 17:02, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Look I understand the situation, but it is too! You can not delete the entire career of the Princess of POP! What if you restore it all and put the template that several people are working on the article and references missing? So at least, and warns that things are missing, but please do not delete all ...--SergiSmiler (talk) 17:06, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Absolutely not. The material cannot be restored until there are inline citations. Once challenged, inline citations are mandatory. It's in the history. You can look there to find out what you need to find sources for and restore it a bit at a time, but it's unacceptable to restore it before providing the sources.—Kww(talk) 17:08, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Nothing man, if you're so convinced of is clear that I can not do anything .... I really hallucinating with you many times ... well .... I still maintain that what you are doing is a huge mistake, you can not delete the career of Britney Spears just because references are missing! You just have to indicate missing them and then people start looking! The BritArmy not stay if DALYs stop in time ... but anyway ... I hope you to think ....--SergiSmiler (talk) 17:27, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of awards and nominations received by Miley Cyrus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wrecking Ball (song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Britney Spears discography

For the last time, per WP:DISCOGSTYLE, the only certifications to be included in discographies are the ones that match the countries used for peak positions. — Status (talk · contribs) 18:43, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:SergiSmiler reported by User:Lady Lotus (Result: ). Thank you. LADY LOTUS • TALK 20:06, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

May 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. You have been told about 3RR and edit warring. Read up on guidelines and policies before you just keep reverting edits on your favorite singers page. Again, if an award doesnt have a page then it isn't notable and will be removed per WP:INDISCRIMINATE. Wikipedia isnt an endless list of every award shes ever been nominated for. LADY LOTUS • TALK 20:40, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, SergiSmiler. You have new messages at Lady Lotus's talk page.
Message added 13:55, 5 May 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

LADY LOTUS • TALK 13:55, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Miley Cyrus awards

LadyLotus is right that your sources are inadequate. Look at http://news.iheart.com/awards/ and see if you can find some legitimate sources for the material.—Kww(talk) 14:27, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the source, but I do not understand what you mean, you want me to finish you complete references or LadyLotus not tell?--SergiSmiler (talk) 17:48, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

If you want the information to be kept, provide the reference. It is always your job to provide a reliable reference for material you add or restore.—Kww(talk) 18:57, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Progress

Good afternoon. I wanted to drop you a note to make you aware that another editor asked me to look at your editing behavior here. I see that you have been working with other editors to improve your understanding of Wikipedia process and that's good. I hope you keep it up, and stay out of edit wars. I do want to emphasize that although your recent WP:AN3 report (notice above) was archived without any action taken, it is likely that if an admin had reviewed it, it would have resulted in a lengthy block. Please endeavor to listen to advice from other editors about staying away from edit wars and providing reliable sources. If you find yourself reverted on an article, discuss it on the talk page. Do not edit war. It is likely that if you are reported for edit warring again, you will receive a block of 3 months or longer. --Spike Wilbury (talk) 18:11, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

May 2014

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of awards and nominations received by Miley Cyrus. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. You need to abide by guidelines when they are properly cited towards you and not call them 'non-sense'. We have been over this before that not every award she is ever nominated for has to be present on her article. LADY LOTUS • TALK 23:50, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Miley Cyrus awards

Take it to the talk page and get WP:CONSENSUS on adding the awards. If you get comsensus, then the awards can be added. LADY LOTUS • TALK 18:24, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Okay, that will, I hope everything is resolved, thanks (SergiSmiler (talk) 14:40, 24 March 2014 (UTC))

@SergiSmiler: Hey Sergi, When you need help, you can ask me and I will always be ready to help ;) . Just ping me.. - Shane Cyrus (talk) 05:23, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for false and insufficient citations. I was here giving you a warning about this edit, where you used a Danish citation that didn't support what you were adding and a Tweet to override the RIAA, when I saw that you had attempted to edit war your bad data in again. You are blocked until you agree to stop adding certifications to articles that contradict the certifications from the certification agencies and adding citations that do not support the data in the edit. Any admin can unblock when they believe that SergiSmiler has competently agreed to that condition. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

—Kww(talk) 15:03, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

SergiSmiler (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello , I ask them to remove the lock for two simple reasons : I did not put fake references , were the official website of the Danish organization and twitter rapper 's own lyrics , from my point of view are two quite truthful sources by proximity to the truth. So I just say , if I misunderstood sorry, maybe it's because my English is not very good ... no ... what happens is that this makes no sense , an indefinite blockade is too strict punishment for such a thing ... I did nothing wrong , just wanted to state that these two references are true, to see if I understand, the certification of Denmark look on their official website , and twitter in the U.S. rapper himself, but that only fits happily Allow the RIAA would have been enough , this lock was not necessary.

Finally, I apologize for this error , we have misunderstood and end this ended badly ... I at no time wanted to do vandalism or something, just ask me is remove the lock because I know that is what is required ... if I had put a statement on my talk page that these references could not be used would have spoken and ready ... well , I have also seen that there has been talk that I was adding certifications in the discography of Britney ... well , I do not knew that these countries could not be in the article, it really did not understand anything , because I saw that the reference was good ( which is provided by users in their products) and knew nothing , and when I notice my talk page I understood and stop editing because I knew it could go something like this ... one more thing , I have seen that LadyLotus has been talking to other members of Wikipedia looking for I block the account ... I do not know if this is for your fault, but I think he's exaggerating, I know English is not the best , but to say that I am disturbing not seem to be the right thing also, if I had said I would be locked faster than the clap ... so I'd say they are not as bad they say, just looking for the same thing but when I deleted my contributions feel despised and hated ... there are very few users who have supported me ... just ask them to remove the lock , I did nothing wrong , no no disturbing and when I talk to someone on the discussion threads and other user does not wish to extend , so you should see if I really am the only one who has a problem ...

In conclusion, I have been blocked for using a font that are supposedly " fake" , well, my opinion is completely opposite , use the twitter page of the singer himself to add a certification is true ( also many references only lead to PDF files you know who I went ... ) and I know I'm too heavy, but I did not bother trying to reason with my arguments are made, I try to reach a solution but only serves you say the other ... I repeat , I apologize for this misunderstanding , and please remove the block ... everything has been a grand mistake ... Thanks.--SergiSmiler (talk) 17:42, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Accept reason:

User has agreed not to use certifications that contradict the certification agency. Issue with Danish source was an error on my part.—Kww(talk) 14:45, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Comment This user has now been blocked 3 times for his disruptive edits. He calls guidelines and policies 'nonsense' and doesn't understand consensus. The language barrier has created too much of a problem for him to be or become a reliable editor. I suggest not unblocking. LADY LOTUS • TALK 18:12, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

No one is saying that the Danish reference wasn't to the official website. Can you tell me what part of http://www.ifpi.dk/?q=certificeringer&page=60 says anything about Miley Cyrus?—Kww(talk) 18:19, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Comment I suggest that the user not be unblocked because even though he likes Miley Cyrus, He doesn't support his content with reliable sources. Such editing can be dangerous for encyclopedic autoconfirmed pages. His edits mostly aren't in bad faith but I don't think he is ready for Wikipedia. Shane Cyrus (talk) 05:32, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

---

Well, I've seen your comments and see you still do not understand ... I will do two things:

First answer Kww: if you look is a list of certifications where you can see perfectly in the top of the list song Will I Am where Miley is working , ie , the song was certified officially and here in this list are notice in this great list.

Second : Regarding LadyLotus Shane Cyrus ... and perfectly understand the concessive , but here it is very rarely get to do this, that is, that almost never get a consensus and why I'm so heavy. My references used to be " unreliable " but since those last three blocks now understand better how Wikipedia works, it's really not me all the rules and stuff, but for this there are these discussion pages , but only you limit yourselves to delete my edits and that's when we have your comments do not reflect at all the reality ... work every day for items on Miley I are well made and complete , it is true that language is difficult for me , but when you edit something in English and I added no one complained ... how much was edited a bit to fulfill spelling rules , but nothing more.

In conclusion, I did nothing wrong to deserve this block , the two references for which we have this discussion are reliable for proximity to the truth , and even if they do not want certain users to have me here, just say come to your senses about me blocking, because I tell you, since I work here articles I have lots of information and some users thanked me , in the same manner as in the Wikipedia in Spanish , where I collaborate every day and I've had great debates but has managed to have good results without the need for a permanent locking . Please, I apologized , I unlock the account , please ... I'm no vandal ...--SergiSmiler (talk) 14:01, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Sergi, you have been caught sockpuppeting too with a vandal-only account.--Shane Cyrus (talk) 14:05, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

I'm sorry but i don't understand that you said of my count Shane Cyrus...--SergiSmiler (talk) 14:12, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

We all know you areUser:SebastianDumitrescu--Shane Cyrus (talk) 14:15, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

I don't believe the account Shane is talking about had anything to do with Sergi.—Kww(talk) 14:20, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

It was my mistake with the Danish citation: I am sorry for not having seen that it did contain the reference that was being disputed. As for the Twitter, no, that isn't a reliable source for a certification. If you will agree not to use certifications that contradict the certification agency again, I will unblock you.—Kww(talk) 14:20, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

OK, understood then, I still think that using twitter is good, but perhaps if you can be a bit "out of regulation" finally ... finally tell you that if you unlock me, thank you very much for such action, I really appreciate it . thanks Kww --SergiSmiler (talk) 14:32, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

That account was created within an hour after Sergi was blocked and made nearly identical edits. The name also was similar. That was my reason of suspecting. --Shane Cyrus (talk) 14:25, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Shane Cyrus is the first time in my life I see that also has only have a computer and I do not intend to create any account with I have enough, I have no ambition of that kind, I guess it was pure chance, although I understand a little a suspicion, although Sebastian Sergi there some difference: D.--SergiSmiler (talk) 14:32, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Warning

On Wikipedia, We assume good faith. You call guidelines, nonsense and a person who asks for sources, foolish?. Warning:This behaviour is not bore on Wikipedia. Be a fan, but in real life. Do not repeat any such words again. --Shane Cyrus (talk) 14:51, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Bring reliable sources to the GA. Nothing is obvious. --Shane Cyrus (talk) 14:58, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Inputting references

SergiSmiler, when adding references, you need to use the cite template to fill in the references not just have the url. If you have the toolbar where it says "advanced" "special characters" "help" "cite", if you click "cite", it'll drop down a menu and on it it says "template", click that and do "cite web". There it will ask for Author, Title, Url, Publisher, Date, Accessdate and others. Thanks :) If you have any questions, just ask LADY LOTUS • TALK 14:18, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

(Same text as above but in Spanish) SergiSmiler, cuando al añadir referencias, es necesario utilizar la plantilla de citar para llenar en las referencias no sólo tener la url. Si usted tiene la barra de herramientas donde dice "avanzadas" "caracteres especiales" "ayuda" "citar", si hace clic en "citar", que va a desplegar un menú y en se dice "plantilla", haga clic eso y hacer "cite web ". Añadir Autor, Título, Url, Editorial, Fecha, fechaacceso y otros. Gracias :) Si tienes alguna duda, pregunta :) LADY LOTUS • TALK 14:24, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks LadyLotus.--SergiSmiler (talk) 16:48, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

FDR Charts

Hello. It's about reverting my recent edits in the article "Adore You". Please, look at the WP:BADCHARTS and find the FDR Chart there. It means that this chart should not be used in any Wikipedia article. Secondly, given sources are not even for the chart, but for the track lists of compilation albums (you can find the word compilation in the links). --demis^talk 18:02, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

This criterion on the chart is the dumbest ... really, every day I was more stunned by your rules ... every day have less sense ...--SergiSmiler (talk) 18:21, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

The Bionic Tour (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to The Beautiful People, Woohoo, Burlesque (film), What a Girl Wants (song) and Prima Donna (song)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Recent addition to Miley Cyrus

I have told you before that because the article is a "Good Article", that it needs to have more than just the URL when adding a reference. And you need to properly word it. If you can't, then take it to the talk page and have an editor add it for you. LADY LOTUS • TALK 15:58, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

July 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Bangerz Tour. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. — TheMadonnaMusicCN (talk, contribs) 19:20, 2 June 2014 (UTC)