Speedy deletion of Pandithar

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Pandithar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ukexpat (talk) 14:27, 16 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Nambiyar

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Nambiyar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ukexpat (talk) 14:28, 16 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Sholiyar

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Sholiyar, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. RavichandarMy coffee shop 15:34, 16 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

June 2008

edit

  Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Vadama, without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. EnviroboyTalkCs 14:34, 19 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

 
Hello, Sembian valavan. You have new messages at Nancy's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

FBI??? Wow!

edit

Hi Vyaghra, just saw that you have threatened Ravichndar84, about reporting him to the FBI. I presume that by FBI, you mean to say Federal Bureau of Investigation. I was just curious to know, how and why would FBI take action on him? Just have a Single Point advice for you. Stop this crap and try to live happily ever after (although I have doubts). Thanks. Shovon (talk) 19:19, 19 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the offer. Although I don't see where I have use threatening language, but pleassssssee report my name to FBI. That way, I might become famous and have an article on Wikipedia itself. Looking forward to your kind co-operation in this regard. :-) Shovon (talk) 09:52, 20 June 2008 (UTC)Reply