SelfStudyBuddy

SelfStudyBuddy is a nasty brat

Look pal, I don't know what your racial agenda is here, but that is most definitely a picture of Eddy Murphy on Ainsley Harriot's page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Maggy P (talk • contribs) 16:04, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Clearly not vandalism.

[EDIT]Wow, thanks for being reasonable and hearing my requests. Thats some good Wiki! You changed my posting to: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_injection

Here is a list of code injection flaws i have found: http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2007-0134 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2007-0132 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2007-0130 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2006-6781 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2006-3208 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2006-3207 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2006-3206 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2006-3205 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2006-3204 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2006-3203 Where is your list?

This code injection page is a total mess, I think my changes where most justified.

I totally stepped on the first code injection example for two reasons. For one that case is NEVER going to happen in REAL software EVER. At no time will a comment from a web forum be passed to system(). This is not going to happen because there is no absolutely no constructive reason to do this. Also I think that more people have seen HTML than seen the command-line interface.

Bothremydidae

is a family of turtle. Dlohcierekim 03:21, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Soggy biscuit declined speedy

as it is a long standing, referenced article. Google hits include sites that seem to confirm the basic information, so not nonsense, though I do not know that this would survive an RfA as there are no Google news or Google scholar hits. Cheers, Dlohcierekim 22:01, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Cannabis Culture & Cost

Eleven years ago The Ottawa Citizen published four consecutive Editorials in four days calling for the legalization of Cannabis. Calling the Editor to commend him for such bold action, it was suggested an article be submitted for payment if published on the Op-Ed page. On submission, the Editor said, "Now we're going to have to shit or get of the pot."

It was published as a Letter To The Editor with the heart and guts edited out so that no reader would have a clear perspective or understanding of the issue. If you're interested, you can read the article in the discussion here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ray_Joseph_Cormier and maybe comment on the images in the article. Peace DoDaCanaDa (talk) 20:04, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

John Shuster

With all due respect, he isn't very good, and his page does not adequately show that fact. 128.180.237.39 (talk) 18:45, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

4chan's not my thing. 128.180.237.39 (talk) 19:24, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, SelfStudyBuddy. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, SelfStudyBuddy. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, SelfStudyBuddy. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)