October 2006 edit

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Rantz. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 07:15, 28 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

April 2008 edit

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Grandfather paradox. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --TerrorBite (talk) 13:36, 1 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Knock it off edit

 
You have been blocked for a period of 31 hours from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.  Netsnipe  ►  14:18, 1 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Shit out of luck edit

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Shit out of luck, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=shit+out+of+luck. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 09:03, 30 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Shit out of luck edit

 

A tag has been placed on Shit out of luck requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. mauler90 (talk) 09:10, 30 August 2008 (UTC)Reply