Sebquantic

Archive: Image-related notices and warnings left by bots are archived here.

Anarchy Online

GA nominations go through a different route actually, but I went through and handled the process for ya. Keep an eye on the talk page and someone should come by and give you a review.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 21:23, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks Kung Fu, I didn't know there was a seperate review page for GA. Sebquantic (talk) 21:48, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Anarchy Online

Anarchy Online was nominated for Good Article review, and the person that nominated, User:Kung Fu Man it says that it is not his article but yours and that your are the one who will read the Good Article review and make the necessary fixes. If this is true, go to Talk:Anarchy Online/GA1‎ and respond to my comments about the article. Otherwise, the article will fail. Please feel free to contact me with any questions or comments. Regards, —Mattisse (Talk) 23:17, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Just to let you know that the seven day deadline is somewhat flexible as long as you are progressing on the article. Great to have you working on it! Regards, —Mattisse (Talk) 16:39, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Amon

Hi. I'm afraid I've been wrestling with my computer OS recently, and haven't had any time to work on the discography page. I'll try to get back to it within the week. Good luck on the GA :) -- Quiddity (talk) 20:01, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

		The Barnstar of High Culture
		Huge thanks for all the work put in at Amon Tobin. Hope you're well, wherever you may be. :) -- Quiddity (talk) 06:29, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Amon Tobin

Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article Amon Tobin you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 10 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. – Ms. Sarita ^Confer 21:47, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Amon Tobin

No, thank you for this edit. That was much more work than anything I have done to the article, and the reason it got to GA class in the first place. If you ever want to improve it even further, just let me know (I've still been making little tweaks here and there to the article). Rtyq2 (talk) 17:45, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Anarchy sources

I'm not yet convinced that allvatar (the original German source) is reliable. German Wikipedia has never heard of it, and I haven't found any other major sites or news outlets that recommend or really even mention it in any way. A different allvatar page is referenced in a book, but I've no idea how reliable that is. They haven't been around long enough (only since 2006, and probably less than that) to be reliable by time alone. It can't be written off as self-published, either—it makes claims about third parties, I've no idea if the editors have written for other reliables, etc. Their editor page says nothing of their prior projects or their editing practices (if any). Not that interview-by-irc is a bad thing, but I've not seen any reliable sites that do that, either.

As long as I can't tell that allvatar is reliable, there's no hope for aoc.curse.com—that one depends on allvatar's "cred", so it should probably be removed.  :( --an odd name 11:25, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ars Technica

The article Ars Technica you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ars Technica for eventual comments about the article. Well done! –– Jezhotwells (talk) 12:18, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

DivX vs. DIVX (Digital Video Express)

I removed your entry in the DivX article because it belongs in the DIVX (Digital Video Express) article. The company DivX, Inc., and the video codec of the same name, have nothing to do with the all caps DIVX that refers to the DVD copy protection format. Porfitron (talk) 17:04, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Fat Freddy's Drop

The article Fat Freddy's Drop you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Fat Freddy's Drop for things which need to be addressed. S Masters (talk) 06:29, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Talk:Vaporware/GA1

I've put the article on hold, and started detailing my concerns. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 22:04, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Fat Freddy's Drop

The article Fat Freddy's Drop you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Fat Freddy's Drop for eventual comments about the article. Well done! Thanks for all your hard work in making this a better article. Congrats on the GA. - S Masters (talk) 07:29, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Fat Freddys Drop - Wandering Eye Sample.ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fat Freddys Drop - Wandering Eye Sample.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:19, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

FFD

Congratulations on the GA pass for Fat Freddy's Drop. Let's get their discography up to FL-class now! The main things that need doing are referencing, filling in the music video details, and a bit of MoS work. Adabow (talk) 07:39, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Europa Barbarorum

Hi there. I notice that you were involved in this article's peer review and was wondering whether you could help me with it again. I have recently given it a bit of a re-write, trying to stick to the guidance provided at VGPR of broadening the audience and so forth, but would be very grateful if you could read over the article and tell me whether I have actually achieved these aims (after all, after reading over one's own work too many times, one can get somewhat lost in it and require the assistance of a fresh pair of eyes). I am conscious that I have not yet addressed the reliable sourcing issue—I am working on it—but for the time being, could you just have a look at the article prose and tell me whether any of it needs to be cut etc.? Because, after all, why bother accurately referencing a sentence that will just get cut at GAN anyway? Thanks in advance. It Is Me Here ^{t / c} 17:01, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Benji B Radio Sample.ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Benji B Radio Sample.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:23, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 24 November 2015 (UTC)