User talk:Seany91/Archives/2022/May

Editor adding World Cup content

Hi, I saw you reverted several of HiddenFace101's edits on articles. Could you have a look at Norway women's national football team as well because I believe they added the same kind of stuff there if I'm not mistaken? Sorry I am only lightly partaking in the football wikiproject, so I am not familiar with how things are done there and would rather not revert him if it turns out his changes were constructive. Thanks in advance. --TylerBurden (talk) 00:01, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Sure, I'll take a look. I reverted some of their edits, but there were just so many that I ended up leaving a message on their talk page. Seany91 (talk) 12:45, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Appreciate it! TylerBurden (talk) 22:50, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Is there an administrator warning they can give, along the lines of, "Cool Your Jets"? This person had dozens of Women's World Cup edits removed, then added the nonexistent "2027" tournament to dozens of women's national team articles. Combative attitude on them, too. I reverted some of that but it was so much. They're also categorizing players' heritage and other people's heritage seemingly based only on their surnames, no sources. The edits to Léa Khelifi and Jada Mathyssen-Whyman I'm certain were untrue, and reverted Łukasz Bejger, Romāns Kvačovs, Vasily Potto, Ivan Bakanov and Oleksii Reznikov – these last two are active politicians in Ukraine, so, it's important not to spread dubious information, one would think... - Thanks, Demokra (talk) 05:08, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

@Demokra: Could try a warning on their talk page about sources if you haven't already, if nothing else works there is always WP:AN/I if problems persist. But yea those "Russian descent" edits on Ukranian articles are particularly weird, I have seen multiple accounts and IP's before on crusades making similar unsourced edits and changing nationalities of Ukranians to Russian and it usually ends with them being blocked. Not saying the editor is some "Russian bot" but like you said, these aren't things to spread misinformation about. TylerBurden (talk) 05:21, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

@Demokra: @TylerBurden: I've left talk messages and got some very feisty response from this user. In any case I've tried to go through their edits as much as I could and reverted/edited where appropriate. Did not report this user because, while I find their edits very annoying, I don't think they rise to the degree of them getting banned. Seany91 (talk) 21:58, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of United States girls' national under-16 soccer team

The article United States girls' national under-16 soccer team has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Sources are only the official ussoccer website, lacks substantive *independent* coverage for team of 15-year-olds

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92^Talk 20:13, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of United States girls' national under-16 soccer team for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article United States girls' national under-16 soccer team is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United States girls' national under-16 soccer team until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Reywas92^Talk 13:20, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Olli Harder

I've started a discussion about this article at Talk:Olli Harder, and have asked at WT:FOOTY for more opinions (as there's no point just the two of us weighing in). Joseph2302 (talk) 08:51, 12 May 2022 (UTC)