Welcome! edit

Hello, Scortyro, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Parsons The New School for Design. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Frze > talk 07:28, 24 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: JD Institute of Fashion Technology (January 24) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

The existing submission may be deleted at any time. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!
  • Please remember to link to the submission!
(tJosve05a (c) 19:46, 24 January 2014 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Scortyro, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

February 2014 edit

  Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 21:38, 19 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your edits to Comparison of time tracking software and Comparison of project management software edit

Thank you for your edits to Comparison of time tracking software. Unfortunately your edits had to be reverted, because the software you added to the list does not have a Wikipedia article. The same applies to your edit to Comparison of project management software. Please write the article first, or post to Wikipedia:Requested articles requesting that it be created. Please make sure that the article follows Wikipedia guidelines, especially as concerns verifiability, reliable sources and neutrality. If a software product is not notable according to the Wikipedia definition, it shouldn't have an article and neither should it be in the lists. Thank you! --bonadea contributions talk 18:35, 23 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Livetecs.com edit

 

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Livetecs.com, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising,  . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You are welcome to edit the page to fix this problem, but please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. As well as removing promotional phrasing, it helps to add factual encyclopaedic information to the page, and add citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Wgolf (talk) 21:19, 23 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Livetecs.com edit

 

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Livetecs.com, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising,  . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You are welcome to edit the page to fix this problem, but please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. As well as removing promotional phrasing, it helps to add factual encyclopaedic information to the page, and add citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Wgolf (talk) 22:26, 23 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Livetecs.com, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Wgolf (talk) 22:26, 23 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for block evasion (User:Sconstantinro. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Diannaa (talk) 00:18, 24 February 2014 (UTC)Reply