A belated welcome! edit

 
Sorry for the belated welcome, but the cookies are still warm!  

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Scabab. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 14:35, 13 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

February 2023 edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 05:18, 5 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • This is primarily due to your refusal to work constructively with other editors at resolving this sourcing dispute, as embodied by you continuing to edit-war and levy false accusations of vandalism while already at AN/I. If you can show that you will work constructively with others and not edit-war, I am open to unblocking—or, well, since you are currently blocked by JBW on Special:Contributions/89.242.61.79, I am open to reducing this block length to match that one. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 05:21, 5 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • They said a source was required for the pages, I found several sources, put it in and it was still undone and I was still blocked anyway. They were even sources straight from Toei themselves. Scabab (talk) 14:10, 6 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
    Please familiarize yourself with our reliable sources rule, as it seems you still do not understand the concept. — The Hand That Feeds You:Bite 17:58, 6 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Since when is Toei not a reliable source when the movie is made by Toei? One of the sources came directly off their fiscal report. Then it was removed. That's vandalism. Scabab (talk) 18:57, 6 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Scabab (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I found numerous sources with the information I included. I included them and everything as said above one figure came straight from Toei themselves. Many sites stated the figures I listed. Apparently all the sources just "didn't count" and the legitimate and accurate information was just outright removed though other pages use sources from the same sites.Scabab (talk) 21:21, 27 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Accept reason:

Don't-give-a-fuckism is a valid approach to avoiding disputes, so alright, unblocked per WP:ROPE. Please understand that returning to that kind of behavior will likely lead to a reblock, which will be significantly harder to get reversed. Happy editing! -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 22:27, 27 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Please reread why I blocked you. I don't care about the merits of your arguments in the underlying dispute. I care about how you've conducted yourself. Wll you commit to not edit-warring and to collaborating constructively with other editors? -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 21:27, 27 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, alright then no more edit warring. You have my word. Scabab (talk) 21:30, 27 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Halfway there... -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 21:31, 27 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Sorry? Are you referring to the collaborating with other users? The page can stay as it is. I have no interest to go any further with that. Scabab (talk) 21:36, 27 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Okay, let's put it this way: Can you describe how you'd handle a similar content dispute in the future? -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 22:11, 27 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Id just leave it alone, not worth the hassle. I don't edit that often to begin with. I'll just update a number or fix a typo. It was only really this kind of thing that got other people to dispute it in the first place and I'm not gonna bother anymore. Scabab (talk) 22:14, 27 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply