Scéal-Nua (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
You know what... I have realized a few things. Number one, while I know I am in the right, I really don't see the purpose in trying toedit with Wikipedia. I suspect no one is going to look at that article anyway, so if it is inaccurate and biased as can be, there is little harm in it from my point of view. Those who are interested in the subject rely more on books and primary sources than they do on Wikipedia, in fact Wikipedia is not considered a verifiable source in most academic circles. Myself and my coworker had originally intended to tell the true story and be a bit fair to both sides, but after encountering so much self-defeating opposition from "Wikipedians" (muffled laughter) we on second thought are realizing that we are telling it to no-one since no-one reads this on Wikipedia anyway. I must point a few things out to you people... We tried to do you a favor, and you attacked us because of your "policies" and probably because you wanted to maintain your biased version of the article up there (I think that is your true motivation), which are ambiguous at best and which you have broken in this case as much as if not more than anyone else. The only harm you are doing is to Wikipedia by preventing good work from posted up. I have decided to take my work elsewhere and retire my account, just like my co-worker. Since we have already broken with Wikipedia's "civility" policy in that you have started calling me a "meat-puppet" (which is not even a thing at all, but something someone on Wikipedia made up) I will label you people as well. In my opinion, you are self-defeating, obtuse and vain people, greatly to be ashamed the lot of you. Moreover from what my co-worker has told me he issued challenges to single combat to several of you because he thought that would be a fair way of settling the editing conflict... you all declined these challenges, which in our mind makes you cowards. I only request that our accounts be unblocked so that we can delete all the information on our talk pages and sandboxes and plug in the retired label on my user page. We are done... thankyou for making us laugh by your deluded vanity and enjoy being wrong and thinking that you are right.
Decline reason:
Alright, if you no longer wish to edit Wikipedia, I'll procedurally decline this unblock request. Qwyrxian (talk) 08:20, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Scéal-Nua (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I would like a one day unblock for Tuesday November the 27th. I only want this so I can eliminate all the data on my sandbox and plug in the retired label on my userpage so as to "formalize" so to speak, my alienation from Wikipedia and to avoid having my work (as shown in the sandbox) plagiarized by a potential rogue third party. Beyond that, I will not make any further edits and I consent to being blocked after that. Moreover, this will be my final unblock request. My word is good.
Decline reason:
I've deleted your sandbox as requested. You can't put the "retired" template, because you didn't retire--you were indefinitely blocked. Qwyrxian (talk) 01:52, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.