SavvyFare

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tamara Kalinic (March 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tamara Kalinic and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:41, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello, SavvyFare! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:41, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Tamara Kalinic

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Tamara Kalinic, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:42, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I received notification that my submission to create a new page for influencer Tamara Kalinic has been denied. I am writing to formally appeal this decision. I understand that the decision may have been made due to insufficient references or links provided. Please allow me the opportunity to add more reference and whatever else is needed. I am dedicated to crafting a page that accurately represents this bloggers achievements and impact.

I kindly request that you reconsider my appeal and grant me the chance to improve the submission. Your guidance and feedback throughout this process would be greatly appreciated. Thank you. SavvyFare (talk) 16:56, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

There are a couple of separate matters here:

1. I have declined your draft, because it was entirely promotional in tone and content, and not based on reliable and independent sources. If it isn't deleted (see next point), you are welcome to continue editing it, and can resubmit it once you have rectified these problems.
2. I have also requested that it be deleted for the same reason. That will depend on an administrator attending to the request. If you wish to contest the deletion request, you must do so on the draft's talk page, and you must do it very soon as it may be deleted at any moment.

You should also read and action the section below, titled 'Managing a conflict of interest'.

Thank you, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:06, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

THank you. I just missed it- and it has already been deleted. Does this mean I have to begin all over again and create and resubmit a brand new draft? SavvyFare (talk) 17:31, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Yes, that's what it means. And as it turns out to have been a copyright violation as well, it probably won't be returned to you even if you were to ask. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:39, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Copywrite? I had used some of the text on Tamara's Website. But i added the hyperlink to the website. Im not sure now what to do. i cannot create a new Tamara Kalinic page? SavvyFare (talk) 18:06, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, SavvyFare. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Tamara Kalinic, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:47, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Please respond to this query, so that I don't have to keep asking. Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:13, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi, im replying in response to this query. I am reading above that this has been tagged a potential conflict of interest? I am not associated with the person and i dont have an organization that is linked here. I would appreciate the opportunity to work on my edits and read more about avoiding any potential promotional text. SavvyFare (talk) 23:33, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello SavvyFare! Your additions to Draft:Tamara Kalinic have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source. You must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. Read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Our policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 17:06, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Im very sorry. I didnt realize that I made these mistakes. I thought using the text from Tamara's bio page website was ok since I had hyperlinked the site. Could i create a brand new page and go through all of the above points you sent me and make sure I dont make the same mistakes? SavvyFare (talk) 18:07, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

You may start a new draft writing in your own words. You may want to read HELP:Your first article. -- Whpq (talk) 18:09, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Oh ok, i see - has to be in my own words. Ill make sure to read the first article link carefully. Thank you so much!!! Ill start a new one from scratch. Appreciate it. SavvyFare (talk) 18:13, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:SavvyFare/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:SavvyFare/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 23:15, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

I would like the opportunity to review Wikipedia's rules for promotional wording and edit the draft. SavvyFare (talk) 23:52, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Would it be possible to retrieve the deleted material? Ty SavvyFare (talk) 23:53, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Tamara Kalinic

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Tamara Kalinic, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 00:06, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

Advice on getting established as an editor

Your first attempts to create an article have been deleted, which must be frustrating, as you had evidently put a significant amount of work into them. My advice to new editors is that it is best to start by making small improvements to existing articles, rather than creating new articles. That way any mistakes you make will be small ones, and you won't have the discouraging experience of repeatedly seeing hours of work deleted. Gradually, you will get to learn how Wikipedia works, and after a while you will know enough about what is acceptable to be able to write whole new articles without fear that they will be deleted. Over the years I have found that editors who start by making small changes to existing articles and work up from there have a far better chance of having a successful time here than those who jump right into creating new articles from the start. JBW (talk) 13:14, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

I appreciate the advice and will try that. Does this mean I can attempt to create new ones again once I feel like understand the rules better? SavvyFare (talk) 13:21, 10 April 2024 (UTC)