Savoirflare
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent edits, such as the ones to the page Emilio Delgado, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so on Wikipedia:Sandbox rather than in articles.
If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
- Policy on neutral point of view
- Guideline on external links
- Guideline on conflict of interest
I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Jezhotwells (talk) 16:13, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
The reason you got the above warning is that you don't just junk an entire page including the reference in favour of a version that you prefer. You should discuss suggested improvements on the article talk page first. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 16:15, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Emilio Delgado again edit
Hi,
I was very disappointed to see that you had taken little or no notice of the Wikipedia policies to which you have been pointed. Your edit was discussed at Editor Assistance/Requests, which is how I came to the article. You say: The re-write was written by Emilio and myself -- and it doesn't get any more accurate than that. That is called av conflict of interest and you should be very careful of edits to this article or any other with which you have any close association. You may say that your edits are accurate, but you are required to prove that they are so by using reliable third party sources such as newspapers with a repuation for fact checking, not fan sites or TV company promotional sites. What matters in Wikipedia is verifiability to reliable sources. Read up on those policies - if there things there which you don't understand ask me.
Currently the article could do with improved referencing, perhaps you should devote your energies to that. Cheers. Jezhotwells (talk) 07:34, 5 August 2009 (UTC)