SVG animation: edit warring edit

There is a discussion at Talk:SVG animation#Edit warring by user Saukgp about an act of edit warring in which you are involved. You are invited to join the discussion in order to settle the matter. Thank you. Love —LiliCharlie (talk) 14:21, 19 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

March 2016 edit

  Please do not add promotional material to Minimalism and SVG animation. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you....Modernist (talk) 23:18, 19 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Minimalism and SVG animation. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia...Modernist (talk) 23:23, 19 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

It was clarified that external link on svg was inappropriate. May I please know, how external link on minimalism went out of the topic. I found that article which was solely about minimalist trend.
See WP:NOTDIRECTORY, among others. Mild Bill Hiccup (talk) 02:09, 21 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
Read:Wikipedia:Spam...Modernist (talk) 02:26, 20 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

August 2016 edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. —SpacemanSpiff 13:53, 24 August 2016 (UTC)Reply