Welcome edit

Hello, Santhoshsam40, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 17:43, 28 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nokia 8.1 (December 28) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. KylieTastic (talk) 17:43, 28 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Santhoshsam40! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 17:43, 28 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Nokia 8.1 edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Nokia 8.1 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://gadgets.ndtv.com/nokia-8-1-5736?pfrom=home-devicewidget. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick(Talk) 14:02, 29 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Blocked edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=i understand what i have been blocked for and will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and i will not do that mistake again and will make useful contributions instead. ~~~~}}.

Athaenara 14:35, 29 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Santhoshsam40 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

unknowingly i have included content which is copyrighted i think, from the information i have gathered while writing the article and that's the reason why i have been blocked, i think. This happened accidentally as this is my first article and my intention is not to advertise or promote anything. I assure that this won't happen again so please unblock me. Santhoshsam40 (talk) 16:21, 30 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 16:58, 30 December 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Santhoshsam40 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

i understand what i have been blocked for and will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and i will not do that mistake again and will make useful contributions instead. Santhoshsam40 (talk) 03:12, 2 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

All you've done is post the instructions back at us. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:55, 2 November 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Santhoshsam40 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

First of all sorry for posting the instruction as it is, because i thought my unblock request is read by an automated system. Now i have read the appealing blocks guide and i am requesting with my own words. I had posted copyrighted content by mistake. Now i have read the Wikipedia's copyright policy and guidelines and i understand the mistake i had made and why i have been blocked. I promise hereafter i won't do that mistake again and hereafter i will strictly follow all the Wikipedia's policies and guidelines and i will contribute my best for the Wikipedia platform. Santhoshsam40 (talk) 07:13, 2 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

A block system wouldn't be very effective if all you had to do to get unblocked was repeat words back to the system. In any event, you will need to tell us in your own words what copyright is, what Wikipedia's license is, and when/how copyrighted content may be used on Wikipedia. You will also need to tell what edits you intend to make. 331dot (talk) 08:28, 2 November 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Santhoshsam40 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I had posted copyrighted content by mistake. Now i have understood the Wikipedia's copyright policy and guidelines and i understand the mistake i made. Hereafter i won't do any of that mistakes again and hereafter i will strictly follow all the Wikipedia's guidelines and i will contribute my best for the Wikipedia platform. So please reconsider my unblock request. Santhoshsam40 (talk) 10:25, 2 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

You have not followed 331dot's instructions. You will need to tell us in your own words what copyright is, what Wikipedia's license is, and when/how copyrighted content may be used on Wikipedia. You will also need to tell what edits you intend to make. PhilKnight (talk) 15:17, 2 November 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 16:58, 30 December 2018 (UTC)}} Reply

 
This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Santhoshsam40 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #23681 was submitted on Dec 30, 2018 16:55:23. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 16:55, 30 December 2018 (UTC)Reply