Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Tiger, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  :: Colin Keigher (Talk) 16:27, 7 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Vandalism?

edit

I would like to known what you consider "vandalism" regarding my contributions on that page.

While I do believe I used that template quite hastily, I would disengage from making such large edits like that because it does come across as vandalism. I would discuss the matter of your changes in the Tiger page before doing so. Also, try to sign any comment you make using four tildes as so, ~~~~. Thanks :: Colin Keigher (Talk) 16:55, 7 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

edit

Hello, Sandhillcrane, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date.

Thanks for your edits to bird articles, if you like birds drop by at Wikiproject Birds.

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!  —Sabine's Sunbird talk 04:50, 13 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

User page

edit

It would be good if you wrote a little (not too much) about yourself on your user page. It is not a home page, but it belongs to the wiki as general information. Perhaps, take an interest in the layout of others' users pages before starting your own. Snowman 15:41, 13 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Secretary Bird

edit

Hello. Can you please provide references for your addition to Secretary Bird? Wikipedia needs such information to be based on more than your own knowledge of the subject. Please provide a book(s)/article(s) etc that you base this on, and add it to the information in the article. If you do not know how, please look at the other references or leave a note on the talk page. Cheers and happy editing. MadMaxDog 07:47, 18 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Bears

edit

Regarding your change to the bear article, you're right of course, the danger emanating from bears is a relative thing. Bears are for the most part _potentially_ dangerous for the most part depending on human behavior (sneak up on a grizzly and find out) and there have been cases where usually starving weaker young grizzly males have gone after humans as their last resort. Blacks bears are another story entirely. These are the most docile bears on the planet, hell I've seen pictures of one being cornered and chased up a tree by a house cat. A bunch of people have been keeping them for pets lately (the most demanding pet imaginable). Lynn Roger's research http://www.bearstudy.org/About_WRI/Lynn_Rogers.htm might be of interest.

There is one thing to keep in mind with Wikipedia. It was never meant to be up to date compendium of hard science or even to be truthful. More than anything it is a vehicle for the views of Jim Whales and his friends and they've created an environment where popular opinion prevails over fact. Sometimes there is collateral damage such as in your case. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.160.209.75 (talk) 08:23, 10 May 2007 (UTC).Reply

Re: Bears

edit

Of course, bears will far more often than not avoid contact with people. Attacks are often caused unintentionally by people when they surprise a bear or close a garbage dump that a bear may become dependant on. All bears are powerful animals and are capable of killing people. There are recorded incidents of every extant species of wild bear attacking people, with the possible exception of the Spectacled Bear. I'm aware that the threat that people pose to bears dwarves the threat that bears pose to people.

multiple recent edits

edit

Please be sure to cite your sources when making edits. You've recently made numerous edits without a single citation. - UtherSRG (talk) 16:31, 22 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi Sandhill. I notice you've been adding a lot of animal info. Glad you want to help out.
At a glance, you aren't citing your sources, as Uther notes, which isn't allowed. For the format of citations see the Wikipedia:Citation templates. Note, you don't have to actually use the templates, but the way they break out information is preferable. You might want to start a page for yourself to practice: User:Sandhillcrane/sandbox Marskell 21:20, 27 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

September 2007

edit

  Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, which wasn't included with your recent edit to Michael Scofield. Thank you. - Taroaldo 16:26, 18 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Sources

edit

Hi. I noticed you've added a lot of interesting information about such and such a bird being the biggest in its family, smallest in its range, etc. Could you please include your sources with all those edits? That's Wikipedia policy and it makes sure the information is good. I'll be glad to help you with formatting references if you want, though often you can just copy what's already in the articles. —JerryFriedman (Talk) 20:51, 18 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Crotalus adamanteus

edit

Just a few minutes ago you made a change to the Crotalus adamanteus article that I'm afraid I could not let stand. You changed:

"... The largest rattlesnake species, the maximum sizes reported are 244.0 cm (8 ft) (Klauber, 1972) and 251.5 cm (Ditmars, 1936). One captive specimen weighed over 26 pounds (12 kg). ... (Campbell & Lamar, 2004)"

... to

"... The largest rattlesnake species, the maximum sizes reported are 244.0 cm (8 ft) (Klauber, 1972) and 251.5 cm (Ditmars, 1936), and were estimated to weigh approximately 22 kg (48 lb) each. ... (Campbell & Lamar, 2004)"

The problem here is twofold: first, you added new information to a section of text that was already accurately paraphrased and referenced. However, your new information cannot be found in the original source text. This makes it look like your information came from Campbell & Lamar, 2004, even though it didn't. Second, you deleted the statement, also referenced from the same source, that indicated the maximum reported weight. Basically, what you've done is to replace accurate and referenced information with information from an unknown source. This is not helpful. If you must add additional information, or replace existing information, make sure you add a new reference to show where you got it. (PS -- Please answer here if you must, as I've temporarily added your talk page to my watchlist). --Jwinius (talk) 14:02, 24 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Bitis gabonica

edit

In case you hadn't noticed, everything in the Bitis gabonica is neatly referenced. Please add a reference for your latest addition. (PS -- Please answer here if you must, as I've temporarily added your talk page to my watchlist). --Jwinius (talk) 14:07, 24 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Actually, I've gone ahead and removed it. Comparisons with other viperid species really belong in the Viperidae article anyway. --Jwinius (talk) 17:09, 24 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Formatting references

edit

Hello, that was a good piece of information you added to Common Raven, but it would be helpful if you could format references using the cite format. This page - Template:Cite_web is helpful. There is also Template:Cite_book and Template:Cite_journal. Also, be wary of some web references as they are some way down the chain from even scholarly works. If in doubt just ask someone. Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 21:57, 3 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Great Horned Owl

edit

Hello Sandhill, thanks for the new information you added to Great Horned Owl and thank you for citing your source. I'm afraid I have reverted your change and I wanted to be sure to explain why. I took a look at the reference you cited http://www.canadianwildlife.ca/facts/Hornedowl.asp?page=/facts/Hornedowl and sure enough it does list 2.9kg as the high side weight for a Great-horned owl. I was curious about this as it contradicts the existing article. I checked the references cited at the bottom of that page and four of them were broken links. The ones that did work directly conflicted with the weight range cited in the article so the canadian wildlife page is not a very good source for information. Please keep working to improve pages but if you find a webpage that seems to conflict with what others have already written be sure the source is a good one. Thanks! Kirkmona (talk) 13:36, 4 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Python reticulatus

edit

Hi Sandhillcrane, Sorry to have reverted your latest contribution to Python reticulatus, but the report you found has been discussed several times before and has been found to be a gross exaggeration. Other news reports were later published that back this up. See the article "Stay still, will you?", published by The Guardian on 5 January 2004. --Jwinius (talk) 17:32, 11 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Asian bear size

edit

I believe the reference is The Penny Cyclopædia of the Society for the Diffusion of Useful Knowledge. There is a viewable copy on google books if you'd like to check it out.Mariomassone (talk) 21:00, 2 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Units

edit

Noticed you've been making edits related to units and unit conversions. Use of the convert template is highly recommended, and it does the math for you. There are lots of options for it, but the basic use for the most common applications is quite straightforward. Thanks for helping. --Kbh3rdtalk 23:51, 3 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of List of mainstream films with unsimulated sex

edit

An article that you have been involved in editing, List of mainstream films with unsimulated sex, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of mainstream films with unsimulated sex (2nd nomination). Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Steve Dufour (talk) 05:53, 23 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Infrastructure Solution Services

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Infrastructure Solution Services, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 20:32, 23 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Sarus wingspan

edit

Do you have a reliable source for the 280 cm wingspan ? Please note at Talk:Sarus Crane - the ICF actually lists about 240 cm, afaik, wingspan is a tricky measure due to the subjectivity of its measurement and dependence on method used. Perhaps you have a journal reference for this change ? Thanks Shyamal (talk) 16:23, 21 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

I based it on this page: http://www.oiseaux-birds.com/card-sarus-crane.html This other page also list Sarus as having a "9 foot wing span": http://www.cougarmountainzoo.org/The%20Animals/saruscranefact.aspx

The article incidentally was raised to GA status and one of the important features is the traceability to reliable sources such as books by specialists and journals. The above mentioned websites would not be considered particularly reliable. I also just noticed that the height was also exaggerated - most birds are 150 cm and the record bird was 180 cm but it seems like someone has rounded that off to 200 which is not very accurate. Shyamal (talk) 01:48, 22 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

References

edit

Hi, you have made several edits to articles about birds this evening which have left the pages with error messages showing in red towards the bottom, eg: Fork-tailed_Flycatcher. This has been because there was no {{reflist}} in the "References" section of the article. Next time you see this happen could you perhaps include that instruction rather than leaving the page in a "errored" state that causes it to display on the maintenance lists? It is usually easier for the person who made the edit to fix the problem than it is for someone who first has to work out what that person did before determining the changes necessary to fix it. It is not a big deal, but then it isn't a big deal to get it right once you know how. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 22:11, 25 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Ignoring my previous

edit

It seems that you have possibly not considered my previous message about messing up articles on birds due to a failure to use the reflist template. Yet again, there are multiple pages last edited by you on the maintenance lists because the references are "broken" as a consequence of this. I am inclined to treat any further such edits as vandalism and revert them - you are adding useful information but in a poor manner. If you do not understand how to use this template then please do contact me on my talk page and I will explain it to you. It really is not diffivult & you'll get the hang of it very quickly. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 00:22, 28 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

I tried to see the Fork-tailed Flycatcher reference you referred to but was unable to see the difference in our postings so I had an exmaple. Are you saying that the links in my references are coming up red & not working? Thanks

I figured out what you're referring to. Thanks for the heads-up

Measurement sources

edit

In some of the bird articles, the measurements from reliable regional handbooks are being overwritten with measurements from zoo sites and other non-reliable sources. Note that zoos often have hybrids/inbreds or birds of unknown pedigree and under/overnourished specimens while bird handbooks deal with variation within geographical populations. It would be preferable to entirely avoid citing stray zoo or bird websites as they are not considered as reliable sources. Perhaps you can also discuss this on WT:BIRD but I am afraid some of the measurements added are entirely dubious. Shyamal (talk) 02:08, 2 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Unreferenced bird measurements

edit

You are welcome to participate in the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Birds#Unreferenced_added_measurements_etc. | Snowman (talk) 21:17, 8 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Incidentally, book names are in italics on the wiki, so I have changed the Chestnut-crowned Antpitta article. Snowman (talk) 14:52, 11 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit
If you need help, check out Getting Help below, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Snowman (talk) 14:53, 11 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

refs

edit
  • The Military Macaw list of references you added had the same reference listed twice. This is not necessary and can be avoided by using "ref name". Using "ref name" is quite easy. Please do not leave a bare html urls in the ref list. Please put the title, the publisher, and so on where relevant. I have reformatted your refs on this page - do you see how neater this is? and the reader has a much better idea of what the webpage is before clicking on it. Snowman (talk) 22:21, 17 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Re: Hyacinth Macaw

edit

The measurements of the Hyacinth Macaw were adequately referenced with one of Forshaw's books. Forshaw is one of the world's experts on parrots, so there was no need to change the weight range of this sourced from Forshaw's book. I have undone your edit, because information from www.birdieboutique.com does not override Forshow's data. When changing information please consider the reliability of the information already provided in the article. Snowman (talk) 11:19, 7 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

September 2011

edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. mgiganteus1 (talk) 22:48, 7 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

I agree that it would be helpful if you made edit summaries. Snowman (talk) 16:47, 20 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Year of book

edit

Thank you for using in-line references. I was interesting in the book on bird masses, so I did a search for it on the internet. Looking at the first few pages on-line by following the links on this page suggests that the book is dated 1993. I would be grateful if you would double check the date, which you give as 1992 on the Brown Skua article. Snowman (talk) 16:51, 20 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Bird dimensions and reflists...

edit

Hi, I just noticed that you've added additional referenced data to some of the bird articles that happen to be on my watchlist - but without adding the corresponding {{Reflist}} tag that allows the inline references to appear correctly formatted at the bottom of the article (e.g. on Parasitic Jaeger and Pomarine Skua). Just a heads-up... If the tag's not already there in the references section and you don't add it, it throws up an ugly red warning at the bottom of the page... --Kurt Shaped Box (talk) 19:36, 20 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the heads up!

edit

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

Cooper's Hawk (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link to Thrush
Sharp-shinned Hawk (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link to Thrush

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 8 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. In Snowy Owl, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Ptarmigan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:15, 14 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

References

edit

Could you do me a favor please - when you add references, don't add "(2011)." - either fully format them, with title, publisher, date, etc., or just leave simply as <ref>[http://www.racerocks.com/racerock/rreo/rreoref/mmammals/sealsandsealions.htm]</ref>. This helps filling up refs using reflinks, which otherwise refuses to run thinking the ref. is complete. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 22:48, 16 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. When you recently edited Great Grey Owl, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Strix (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 22 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. When you recently edited Loggerhead sea turtle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Seal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 5 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Martial Eagle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Green mamba and Puff adder
Northern Saw-whet Owl (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Mole

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 12 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Anointment

edit
  Order of the Pigeon
I anoint you a Member of the Wikipedian Order of the Pigeon an impromptu organization to celebrate excellent pigeon-work in it's many forms on Wikipedia. Thanks for adding content to Rock Pigeon‎ and all your other work about the project! Sadads (talk) 16:11, 9 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, it's an honor.

edit

Hi. When you recently edited Python molurus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Geographic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 7 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Coyotes

edit

Why did you write "Although not distantly related" in the article on coyotes ([1])? Did you mean "Although not closely related"? Eric Kvaalen (talk) 16:16, 19 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I did. It was a typo. Thanks

Grévy's zebra

edit

Hi. Could you provide a page number and publisher for the citation to Burnie & Wilson that you just added to Grévy's zebra, please? Rgds, --Stfg (talk) 15:44, 26 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Will have to post it some time later. Not in front of this book now.

I've created the citation in the format used in this article. It now only needs you to fill in the page number, please. --Stfg (talk) 18:59, 26 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

White-tailed Eagle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Raptor and Lamb
Andean Condor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Rhea
Brown bear (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Calm
Marabou Stork (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Egg
Sloth bear (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Black bear

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:14, 28 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Wildcat

edit

   I guess it was spotting "preanal", as an unfamiliar word in the 1st line of a 'graph of Wildcat#Build, that led me to work so extensively without reading the other sections, and a lot of it overlapped with your recent edit to the article (the most recent interesting one), which affected that section. My comments in talk:Wildcat#Pre-anal vs. preanal, talk:Wildcat#Body length, and talk:Wildcat#The cool norths all relate to that section, and if you don't know how to get an automated Diffs listing of what i changed from and to in the article, respond to this note, just below it. (I'll watch yr talk page for a while.) I hope at the least that you'll react if i misconstrued your wording in the analysis i applied in the last of those 3 talk sections: i am claiming no subject knowledge, and just trying to infer, or guess, what was intended by wordings that were ambiguous or at least syntactically awkward. Undoubtedly i said mostly too much in my talk contribs and the "Reason" fields of my tags in the article; don't worry about embarrassing me with very specific requests like "Did you mean that..." or "What in the world did you mean by..." questions. Thanks for the new content!
--Jerzyt 07:30, 29 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Re: Andean condors

edit

You added this: </ref> Andean condors have been observed to do some hunting of small, live animals, such as [[rodent]]s, [[bird]]s and [[rabbit]]s, which (given their lack of powerful, grasping feet or developed hunting technique) they usually kill by jab repeatedly with their bill.<ref name= ADW/>. There is no ref named "ADW", so this gives a big red mistake notice in the reflist section. Perhaps, you can put it right. Snowman (talk) 14:54, 15 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Trumpeter Swan and "Wedge"

edit

Trumpeter Swan: starting in the first sentence of the "Description" section, you added <ref name= Wedge/> several times to the article. Wedge is undefined, however, and causing a citation error in the References section. Could you go back to the article and fill in the reference, please? 71.234.215.133 (talk) 02:49, 16 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

I saw that you deleted the first inclusion of Wedge so I deleted the other five. Perhaps you can add the proper reference someday. 71.234.215.133 (talk) 21:25, 16 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

I have no recollection of adding the "Wedge" reference, will have to double check where I got that.

You added the Wedge non-ref six times in this edit, at the same time you added a full ref for Steve Madge <ref name= Madge>Madge, Steve, ''Waterfowl: An Identification Guide to the Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World''. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt (1992), ISBN 978-0-395-46726-8</ref>. Is it possible there was no Wedge to ref, that you misspelled Madge multiple times? Just trying to help, as whatever Wedge respresents looks like a wonderful reference. 71.234.215.133 (talk) 14:16, 17 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

You know what, I think that Wedge was a typo that I copy and pasted instead of "Madge". Thanks for bringing it to my attention.

Non-citation

edit

I noticed several inappropriate changes in measurements of birds with the citation given as "The Book of Indian Birds" by Salim Ali. I have the book, and checking it shows that the cited reference says nothing about the weights or measurements that you mention. I think this is a serious matter that needs to be avoided particularly in well-referenced articles. The statement that the Sand Lark was the smallest of larks - was what is called WP:OR by synthesis - saying so by your own judgement of measurements from multiple sources, which is strictly against Wikipedia policy. Shyamal

Did not state Sand Lark was the smallest of all sand-larks, I believe I stated it was one of the smallest species and only that it is near the smallest range of sizes (12-13 cm) of the larks. See also, http://books.google.com/books?id=8ndIAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA428&lpg=PA428&dq=sand+lark+smallest&source=bl&ots=_yM_tiTqEj&sig=nea2r-xZJ8Gox1MZObYio_8eKS0&hl=en#v=onepage&q=lark%20smallest&f=false. (talk) 02:58, 24 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

I wanted to add that the measurements listed are included in Ali's book (for example cm for Malabar Pied Hornbill ‎and Indian Grey Hornbill) on the color plates. Does you copy contain these?

Have added a list of editions on Book of Indian Birds - cannot find any reprint/edition of the year 1993. Shyamal (talk) 15:31, 24 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Here is the edition I own: http://www.abebooks.com/servlet/BookDetailsPL?bi=7611003304&searchurl=an%3Dali%26n%3D100121503%26tn%3Dbook%2Bof%2Bindian%2Bbirds

That is a twelfth edition - could not have been printed in 1993 - does not have weights and measurements on the plates- and it would seem like the only ones claiming this peculiar citation on the Internet are on Wikipedia - presumably all being your edits. Shyamal (talk) 07:20, 25 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Look, this is the edition of Ali's book that I have and you are the only one I am aware of who feels these particular citations are peculiar. The cover art is exactly the same and the online book seller even describes it as the 1993 edition. On the flap with the publisher information, it is described as copyrighted in the year 1993. I'm afraid you are simply incorrect regarding the length measurements in cm and, in some cases, the standing measurements in cm of the birds on the color plates. If you want to view these, I recommend buying this book then, even if you already have another edition.

I too have questions about the citations you've been adding to this book. First, you've been using the ISBN "0-149-563731-3" which fails the parity check. I think the actual ISBN is "0-19-563731-3" (without a "4"). In my search to fix this issue, I also had trouble finding the exact book you meant to reference because of the 1993 issue. Eventually I determined that you most likely meant the twelfth edition which was published in 1996, not 1993. The previous eleventh edition was first published way back in 1979, with reprints in 1984, 1986, 1988, 1990, and 1992. The link above you provided doesn't seem to be totally working the way it once did but a link to the cover suggests you do have the twelfth edition. It is possible is that you have obtained a pre-publication version of the twelfth edition from 1993 that was not ready to be published and was using an invalid ISBN on purpose. If you could provide another link to a cover that matches your edition, we can solve this. Second, I too am having trouble verifying that this book actually confirms the information being cited. The help for {{cite book}} describes how to use parameters like "page" and "pages" and "quote" that can be used to point to the exact material that supports the article text. Please consider using these in the future. Jason Quinn (talk) 15:51, 7 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Capitalization

edit

Per MOS (MOS:LIFE, MOS:CAPS, etc.) we avoid capitalization of most words and section titles in the body text (not in references though), say "Commericial hunting and traditional medicine" instead of "Commericial Hunting and Traditional Medicine" in section title, "The tiger" instead of "The Tiger", etc. Cheers. Materialscientist (talk) 00:32, 28 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Great Black-backed Gull (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Egg, Chum, Lamb and Wing chord
Victoria Crowned Pigeon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Fig and Wing chord
Great Bustard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Old Greek
Harpy Eagle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Talon
Marquesan Imperial Pigeon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Wing chord
Rock Dove (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Wing chord

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 04:40, 19 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Harpy Eagle

edit

Here you added notes for Izor, Bierregaard (multiple) and Muñiz-Lopez. Could you complete those references? Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 05:55, 21 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Yellow-rumped Warbler (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Hemlock, Greenbrier, Newfoundland, White cedar and Wing chord
Shoebill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Crane, Water snake and Wing chord
American Redstart (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Fisher and Wing chord
Blackpoll Warbler (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Cankerworm and Wing chord
Hen Harrier (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Corvus and Wing chord
Northern Parula (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Bug and Wing chord
Ovenbird (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Thrush and Wing chord
Yellow-breasted Chat (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Bug and Wing chord
American Goldfinch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Wing chord
Armenian Gull (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Wing chord
Blackburnian Warbler (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Wing chord
Brown Thrasher (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Wing chord
Canada Goose (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Wing chord
Cape May Warbler (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Wing chord
Carolina Wren (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Wing chord
Caspian Gull (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Wing chord
Chestnut-sided Warbler (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Wing chord
Chuck-will's-widow (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Wing chord
Common Nighthawk (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Wing chord
Common Starling (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Wing chord
Common Wood Pigeon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Wing chord
Dark-eyed Junco (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Wing chord
Eastern Whip-poor-will (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Wing chord
Eunectes murinus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to National Geographic
European Herring Gull (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Wing chord
Glaucous-winged Gull (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Wing chord
Glaucous Gull (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Wing chord
Gray Catbird (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Wing chord
Great Potoo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Wing chord
Heuglin's Gull (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Wing chord
House Finch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Wing chord
House Sparrow (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Wing chord
House Wren (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Wing chord
Iceland Gull (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Wing chord
Kelp Gull (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Wing chord
Lesser Black-backed Gull (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Wing chord
Long-tailed Myna (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Wing chord
Louisiana Waterthrush (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Wing chord
Lucy's Warbler (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Wing chord
Magnolia Warbler (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Wing chord
Mallard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Wing chord
Northern Mockingbird (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Wing chord
Northern Waterthrush (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Wing chord
Pallas's Gull (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Wing chord
Slaty-backed Gull (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Wing chord
Thayer's Gull (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Wing chord
Western Gull (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Wing chord
White-throated Sparrow (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Wing chord
Yellow-footed Gull (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Wing chord
Yellow-legged Gull (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Wing chord
Yellow Warbler (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Wing chord

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 26 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Spur-winged Goose (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Social Weaver and Fig
Great Curassow (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Fig
Andean Siskin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Goldfinch
Collared Grosbeak (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Nut
Japanese Grosbeak (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Cedar

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 4 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pileated Woodpecker, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Canadia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:39, 25 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Leatherback sea turtle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Genet (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 2 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Binturong, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Leave and Fig (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 16 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Greenland shark, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wolfish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 23 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Common Raven

edit

Sorry, I had to rejig your addition. The source does not mention the starling or wren so cannot be used there. It is also better to put a comment like that in the body of the text first rather than the lead. And formatting the reference would be helpful too. cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 20:11, 5 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Common Crane, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Corvus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 8 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Coastal taipan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lachesis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 20 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

American black bear (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Diurnal
Nine-banded armadillo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Fan-tailed warbler

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:21, 27 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Edit

edit

Hi Sandhillcrane,

This edit [2] took me a long time to track down, just to tell you that aborigines, are not only from Australia, and the aborigines that you mention are native New Zealanders, not Australians. They're different countries.

Cheers,

Aaadddaaammm (talk) 11:18, 29 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tiger shark, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Seal and Ray (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 3 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Wild Turkey (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Field, Red oak and Prairie chicken
Bald Eagle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Protection Island

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:50, 10 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Bald Eagle

edit

Hi Sandhillcrane. Could you check this edit, please, and see what you meant by adults generally consuming more than juveniles and thus improving energy deficent during winter, as it's currently not quite making any sense. I don't want to change it, since i don't have access to the reference you used, and i don't know what you actually intended to convey. Thanks, Cheers, LindsayHello 08:28, 19 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi Lindsay, That indicated per that study that the survival rates would be greater for adults than juveniles because the adults were able to attain more food. Perhaps the word should be "deficencies".


Thanks. Bizarrely, your talkpage fell off my watchlist, so i didn't notice your reply till just now. Perhaps you could take a look and be sure i haven't misrepresented the source? Cheers, LindsayHello 05:55, 21 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Cinereous Vulture (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Lamb
Magellanic Woodpecker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Spring

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:42, 27 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Golden Eagle

edit

88 ^ Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named Boag

294 ^ Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named Ivanovski

303 ^ Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named Anderson

Please check the invalid <ref> tags. --Frze (talk) 10:46, 29 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

294 ^ Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named Ivanovski

303 ^ Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named Anderson

Please check the invalid <ref> tags. --Frze (talk) 06:23, 30 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Golden Eagle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ptarmigan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:48, 4 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

June 2013

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Nile monitor may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:39, 6 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Great Black-backed Gull may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • ]s (''Puffinus puffinus''), [[Pied-billed Grebe]]s (''Podilymbus podiceps''), [[Common Moorhen]]s ([[tern]]s, [[Atlantic Puffin]]s (''Fratercula arctica''), [[coot]]s (''Fulica'' ssp.), [[Hen

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:11, 28 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to American Robin may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • /ref> According to some sources, the American Robin ranks behind only the [[Red-winged Blackbird]] (and just ahead of the introduced [[European Starling]] as the most abundant, extant land bird in [[

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:37, 28 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Crowned Eagle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tsavo National Park (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 25 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Verreaux's Eagle, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Thorn tree and Dihedral (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:00, 13 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

August 2013

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Verreaux's Eagle may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • 6|to|14|km2|sqmi|abbr=on}}, most were observed to include about the same amount of kopje habitat (up to {{convert|5|km2|sqmi|abbr=on}}.<ref name=BEstudy/> Populations fluctuate surprisingly little

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:36, 14 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kori Bustard, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Leave and Rift Valley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 31 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Mistle Thrush

edit

Hi, I've reverted your GF edits to this article. I'm shortly going to submit it to FAC, so it's important that the referencing is spot on. It's not clear to me that the Wildlife Garden Project is an RS source, let alone that it is a more dependable reference that either Clements Thrushes or HBW. With regard to the weight, HBW is an impeccable source, but you didn't give a page number. I've since reinstated the weight, but referenced it to the on-line text of HBW for consistency (I've used this version elsewhere in the article) and because it's more accessible. I hope this is OK. Cheers, Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:48, 12 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Common Nighthawk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Corvus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 31 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Alaskan hare (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Brown Hare
Ferruginous Hawk (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Washington

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 23 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Buteo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mole (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 31 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Great Blue Heron, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bass, Gunnel and Smelt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 18 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

April 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Wild Turkey may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • foods in the Black Hills, South Dakota''. The Journal of wildlife management, 1420-1423</ref>, [{Gray Wolf]] (''Canis lupus'')<ref>Reed, J. E., Ballard, W. B., Gipson, P. S., Kelly, B. T., Krausman, P. R.,

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:40, 11 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Eastern Screech Owl (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Mole, Chihuahua, Big Bend, Ringtail, Georgia and Cimarron River

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 26 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Birds of Somalia

edit

Hey, I noticed that you added a reference to Birds of Somalia in this edit, marking it as having the ISBN number "030007456". Unfortunately, that ISBN is invalid. From what I can tell based on this WorldCat entry, the actual ISBN is 1-873403-58-5. For the moment, I'm updating the relevant article (Verreaux's eagle) with this ISBN, but I thought I should ask—is there something I'm missing with the "030007456" number? {{Nihiltres|talk|edits}} 19:21, 20 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

No, I can't recall from memory the source of that ISBN, I probably copied it from a reference in another source. I see there's been a more recent edition of this book published in 2013.

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Great horned owl
added links pointing to Mole, Thrush, Rail, East Coast, Ungava, Mud Lake, Pocket mouse, Strix, Glaucidium and Protection Island

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 3 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

On 27th February 2011 you added a large chunk of text to the article Eurasian eagle-owl. When I was editing the article today I noticed that you had copied and pasted text from this page of the Owl Pages in apparent violation of copyright law. Perhaps you could explain.

The question I ask myself is "Has Sandhillcrane made such copyright infringements in other articles?" What about the recent massive expansion of Great horned owl, is it a work of scholarship or one of plagiarism? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 15:53, 25 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

I might have not known at that the time at about copyright infringement, at any rate, I don't recall copying and pasting into the Eagle-Owl for a copyrighted source, if so thank you for catching my error. No, it is one of scholarship...One might use similar language from one's resources, but I invite you to review my recent edits of the GHO article and their sources to determine if this falls under you definition of "plargiarism", which I am not sure is correct if you are sourcing your references.
I did look at a few of the GHO sources and compared them with what you had written and saw nothing amiss. I imagine you are now familiar with the Wikipedia copyright policy and I don't intend to take any further action on this matter. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:27, 28 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

September 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Steller's sea eagle may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • in comparably sized eagles found in forests and fields, such as the "booted eagle" group (i.e. ''[[Aquila (genus)|Aquila'') or "harpy eagles", all of these specializations developed in the aid of

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:03, 19 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Accipitridae, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harrier. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 10 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Spur-winged goose, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anser. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:09, 8 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Brown fish owl, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fig. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:35, 18 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Powerful owl, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Corvus. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 5 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Barred eagle-owl
added a link pointing to Bangka
Spot-bellied eagle-owl
added a link pointing to Strix

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 12 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Eurasian eagle-owl, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kalat. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 7 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Impromptu Collaboration for Brown thrasher and potential FA status?

edit

I recently visited the page saw an expansion of citations, and wondered from where. I figured to thank you for it, and ask if you were interested in helping me buffer up the article as a legitimate FA candidate? I need to replace a few of the citations to more reliable ones, and I have a few in mind from Google Scholar that can be used. Plus I have a subscription to the Birds of North America page for at least until June 7th, so I can attempt to utilize that source as much as possible. Respond either here or on my page when you get the chance, and thanks for your assistance! LeftAire (talk) 22:27, 7 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, I will do some research, when I have time. I also have access to BNA Online, it is a great resource.

All right, then, cool. Just let me know whenever you get started on adding more info, I'll jump in whenever I can. LeftAire (talk) 16:38, 9 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

I got this started, added info to the Dietary section.

May 2015

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Blackburnian warbler may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • 1629-1636.</ref> Hybridization in the wild has been recorded once each with a bay-breasted warbler (in [[West Virginia]], with a [[black-and-white warbler]] (in [[Pennsylvania]]) and possibly a

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:10, 19 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Reference errors on 1 July

edit

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 2 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Nile crocodile
added links pointing to Turkana, Kobus, Water snake, Reed frog and Tana River

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 10 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Verreaux's eagle-owl, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grysbok. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 5 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Brown bear
added links pointing to Greek, Seal, Macedonia, Eastern Russia, Georgia and King Salmon

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 18 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Sandhillcrane. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Great White Pelican

edit

Hello there! I have seen your awesome contributions to the great white pelican. I am trying to bring it to a GA status and then to an FA status. It currently lacks a Taxonomy section and has less content in the Breeding sub-section. I was unable to find much on the Breeding part, so I was wondering if you had any material on it. Would be great if we could nominate it together. Looking forward to your reply. Thanks! Adityavagarwal (talk) 07:39, 27 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, Sandhillcrane. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Red-tailed hawk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Abaco (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 9 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited White-tailed eagle, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Poplar and Lapland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 15 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, Sandhillcrane. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Whooping crane, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Osceola County (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 3 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi, I noticed you have massively expanded many articles about birds of prey. I wonder if you have thought of nominating any of them for WP:good article or WP:featured article? FunkMonk (talk) 02:36, 3 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I would consider that. Perhaps White-tailed Eagle?

Yes, did you ever nominate before? If you have any questions, I'd be happy to assist. It seems you have a nice backlog of ready articles that could be nominated. FunkMonk (talk) 15:05, 3 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I'm unfamiliar with the process. Could you give me any pointers on how to propose it on there?

Yes, as a first time nominator, it would probably be a good idea to put your favoured article up for WP:peer review first, stating there that your goal is GA and eventually FA. Then interested editors will add comments for how to improve the article accordingly. After that, I can help you nominate it for GA (it is pretty easy, though, the instructions are quite clear). FunkMonk (talk) 15:26, 3 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Barred hawk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Columbia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:55, 2 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Dwarf bittern

edit

Hi Sandhillcrane! I've been working my way through the WP:BIRD cleanup listing, and recently looked at dwarf bittern, which you substantially improved back in 2014. However, it contains many footnotes (a la "Tarboton 1980") with no corresponding entry in the reference list. Can you please supply those? Otherwise, the article is effectively unreferenced. And, while you're at it, can you please further explain a "forward display"? Someone asked for clarification on what that meant way back in 2014! Thanks. MeegsC (talk) 19:55, 10 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Actually, I now see that it was lifted almost verbatim from the HeronConservation website. This is a huge no-no, which I'm sure you know! I'm afraid most of the article may have to be reverted. MeegsC (talk) 20:18, 10 July 2019 (UTC)Reply
edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Leopard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cub (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 18 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Barn owl, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cosmopolitan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:14, 26 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Long-eared owl (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Mole, Mercury, Orange, Bush, Chihuahua, Diurnal, Field, New York, Cedar, Mus and Georgia

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:22, 19 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ural owl, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Blind, Pieniny National Park and Poplar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:32, 21 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Tawny owl (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Cabin, Sparrow, Common scops owl and A Murder of Crows

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:29, 23 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Brown bear into Dietary biology of the brown bear. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. I have fixed some of the citation errors, but there are still numerous missing citations that you forgot to copy when you copied the text. — Diannaa (talk) 12:03, 5 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eurasian eagle-owl, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bush (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:49, 7 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Blakiston's fish owl, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Trapper and Human development (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:42, 16 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

  The Fauna Barnstar
To Sandhillcrane, for massively expanding articles such as the owls and hawks. 77.106.107.160 (talk) 11:18, 17 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

On how to nominate article to GA

edit
hi Sandhillcrane, if you feel the article does look good already, you can nomimate it as GA on the article's talkpage like this edit [3],

just copy-paste it and you'll just replace the date and time to current time and the name into your name you've placed/edited it on talkpage. After nominating, you need to wait for reviewer to review your article, if the reviewer reviews the article, they will notify you on your talkpage. The review is like this [4] on other article. You need to address each reviewer request , mostly every article needs to be copyedited/written properly so it will have a higher chance to be GA. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 126.47.237.232 (talk)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hello, Sandhillcrane

Thank you for creating Dietary biology of the brown bear.

User:SpicyMilkBoy, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Wow. Truly excellent work.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|SpicyMilkBoy}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 03:13, 29 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tawny eagle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aquila (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:30, 21 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Bonelli's eagle

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bonelli's eagle you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 22:00, 12 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Steppe eagle, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Natal and Transvaal.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:49, 2 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Steppe eagle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Natal, South Africa.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:27, 9 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Steppe eagle edit

edit

hi Sandhillcrane – this edit you made to the Steppe eagle article is the single biggest edit I can recall seeing on Wikipedia! Out of curiosity: where did you draft the contents of this edit? Did you use one of Wikipedia's editors (see: mw:Editors)? A third-party editor like Google Docs or Microsoft Word? I ask these questions out of curiosity and amazement ^ _ ^ By the way, I'm Peter and I work on the Wikimedia Foundation's Editing Team. PPelberg (WMF) (talk) 18:46, 24 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

I use Excel to sort out references as I research and then wrote the actual Wikipedia article on Microsoft Word. Before I submit a page but after I make the edits on Microsoft Word I tend to do "Show Preview" a number of times until I'm satisfied with the way the page looks. Nice to meet you, Peter, I'm Sam.

Excel for gathering references and Microsoft Word for drafting...understood! I appreciate you sharing this process with me, Sam. If anything software-related comes up as you're editing, please let me know. See you around 👋 PPelberg (WMF) (talk) 00:08, 26 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Bonelli's eagle

edit

The article Bonelli's eagle you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Bonelli's eagle for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 23:22, 23 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pallas's fish eagle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bharatpur.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:26, 21 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Birds

edit

Out of curiosity, do you intend to bring Bonelli's eagle or Pallas's fish eagle to FAC? LittleJerry (talk) 21:51, 29 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

I'm aware that Bonelli's eagle was reviewed in GA, what the steps necessary to bring it to FAC?

User:Sandhillcrane as an IP user on wiki, I'm amazed at your work on Bonelli's eagle (probably your first GA I think). just wondering about bringing your other work on Ural owl, Snowy owl, Martial eagle, and Cooper's hawk into a good article. 49.151.163.255 (talk) 01:20, 30 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
Happy new year both of you guys!. 49.151.163.255 (talk) 16:18, 31 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chacma baboon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bark.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 8 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Upland buzzard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bunting.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 16 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Long-legged buzzard
added links pointing to Bush, Crag, Agama and Chukar

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 16 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

An owl for you!

edit
  Owl barnstar
Thanks for your incredibly detailed articles on tawny owls! Here is a custom owl barnstar from a fellow biologist. HᴇʀᴘᴇᴛᴏGᴇɴᴇꜱɪꜱ (talk) 13:36, 11 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wedge-tailed eagle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Human development.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Verreaux's eagle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Genet.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 2 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply