December 2015

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Dardic languages has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:14, 11 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

edit

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 11:14, 11 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

December 2015

edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Dardic languages. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 11:17, 11 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

 

Your recent editing history at Dardic languages shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Kautilya3 (talk) 11:47, 11 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Sajjid Nawaz. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Punjabi people has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.

Warning

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Punjabi people. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sajjid Nawaz (talkcontribs) 12:13, 11 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Last warning!!!

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Punjabi people, you may be blocked from editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sajjid Nawaz (talkcontribs) 12:24, 11 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

edit

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 12:37, 11 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

I have reverted your edit to Peshawar because there was no edit summary explaining the rationale for the edits, and there was inappropriate edit of the word "Peshawar" in one instance. Please review your edits before saving them, and be sure to include an edit summary that explains what the edit was supposed to accomplish. - Kautilya3 (talk) 12:44, 11 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Final Warning for you recent edit

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Punjabi people.

 

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Punjabis.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Punjabis was changed by Sana ullah faiz (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.883345 on 2015-12-11T12:44:49+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:44, 11 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Edit War

edit
 

Your recent editing history at Punjabi people shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

December 2015

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Punjabis. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 13:09, 11 December 2015 (UTC)Reply