Speedy deletion nomination of Naswiz edit

Hello Sams321,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Naswiz for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Naypta ☺ | ✉ talk page | 11:58, 8 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Welcome! edit

Hi Sams321! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Naswiz, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained. There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing!

Orphaned non-free image File:Shemaroo tvlogo.jpeg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Shemaroo tvlogo.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:58, 28 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Shemaroo tvlogo.jpeg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Shemaroo tvlogo.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:08, 5 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Janhit Mein Jaari moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Janhit Mein Jaari, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. - The9Man (Talk) 09:59, 26 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Links to draft articles edit

  Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Raaj Shaandilyaa. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 09:44, 4 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Eyesflix for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eyesflix is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eyesflix until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Citterz (talk) 10:10, 15 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Janhit Mein Jaari edit

  Hello, Sams321. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Janhit Mein Jaari, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:04, 4 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for July 28 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Kumar Mangat Pathak
added links pointing to Alone, Omkara, Aakrosh and Aatma

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 28 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Filamchi logo.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Filamchi logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 21:34, 21 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Kumar Mangat Pathak for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kumar Mangat Pathak is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kumar Mangat Pathak until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Pillechan (പിള്ളേച്ചനോട് പറ) 21:52, 4 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Sanyukt Vikas Party moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Sanyukt Vikas Party, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DMySon (talk) 14:42, 1 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Dehati disco.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Dehati disco.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 29 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Kumar Neeraj for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kumar Neeraj is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kumar Neeraj until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

scope_creepTalk 18:00, 2 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Sanyukt Vikas Party edit

 

Hello, Sams321. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sanyukt Vikas Party".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. plicit 13:04, 12 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Kamley for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kamley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kamley (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Hitro talk 09:02, 3 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Kyun Na Aaye for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kyun Na Aaye is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyun Na Aaye until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dr vulpes (💬📝) 09:50, 6 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Ritu Chauhan moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Ritu Chauhan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 TT me 11:48, 7 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ritu Chauhan (September 8) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Akevsharma was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Akevsharma (talk) 14:00, 8 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Sams321! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Akevsharma (talk) 14:00, 8 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

September 2022 edit

 

Hello Sams321. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Sams321. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Sams321|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. PICKLEDICAE🥒 14:39, 8 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi Praxidicae thank you for your message, for the clarification i am keeping my point that i am not directly connected and take paid edit for any articles this is my interest to create article releted Indian films and their actors non of above paid me , another part of article page creation I'm working in Film production company so I'm interested to expanding encyclopedia for wikipedia in the field where i work this is proud to me, generally i am fully trying that my article full of independent, generally i show many of article create by another users are not independent and they have not reference found even still on articl without any tag. Sams321 (talk) 15:01, 8 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

How is this your own work? PICKLEDICAE🥒 15:03, 8 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

As per above i mention that i am working on production company. And want to create best article in wikipedia so i put this image as own work link, for more information i personally ask this image to third party PR agency who works for photo shoot of model and actors, request for only this article under my ownership authority u can't find this image on other site so i put as my work. Sams321 (talk) 15:24, 8 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

So you do have a connection and a WP:COI and you must disclose. Period. PICKLEDICAE🥒 15:31, 8 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Ritu Chauhan moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Ritu Chauhan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:55, 8 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

I have moved this back to drafts, because there is too much information (incl. private personal details such as DOB) which is not supported by referencing. Please review WP:BLP for advice on referencing articles on living people. I'm also not sure that the subject's notability has been fully established. If moved into the main space, this would be an obvious candidate for deletion, which you presumably don't want. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:57, 8 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Kamley film.jpeg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Kamley film.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:10, 13 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Kyun Na Aaye.jpeg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Kyun Na Aaye.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:21, 16 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Prem Dhiraal edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Prem Dhiraal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.aninews.in/news/business/business/singer-turned-actor-prem-dhiraals-debut-hindi-film-bera-ek-aghori-to-release-soon20221007183641/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 TT me 09:20, 19 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Prem Dhiraal for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Prem Dhiraal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prem Dhiraal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

—usernamekiran (talk) 11:01, 22 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:45, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

December 2022 edit

 

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

  • Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
  • State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
  • Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.
signed, Rosguill talk 04:43, 5 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
In particular, this is for continuing to make edits to UPE-prone topics such as celebrity and businessperson biographies despite having failed to adequately respond to a COI inquiry in September of this year. signed, Rosguill talk 04:45, 5 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Unblock edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sams321 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hello This is Sams321 i am requesting to unblock because i am not crating article for advertisement or promotion purpose this is my intrest based article as mentioned my user page i love to create article and contribution related of bollywood and indian cinema, and the topic of September i was just made one article for Promotion purpose which i have already disclosed on the article talk page Draft talk:Ritu Chauhan, rest of others article created based on their references and available source, i follow and respect the rules and policy of wikipedia. Thank You ― Sams321 (talk) 05:53, 5 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

You say above that you work on a production company and communiciated with a person's PR agency to obtain a photo that you improperly claimed as your own work. There are two possibilities here. One, you are being honest, in which case you have an undeclared conflict of interest and have improperly licensed images, or you are not being honest and have a deeper connection than you suggest. I'm not sure which, but even if I assume good faith and believe you, the block is still correct. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 11:16, 5 December 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ritu Chauhan (December 28) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Akevsharma was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Akevsharma (talk) 09:01, 28 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Ashok Prasad Abhishek edit

  Hello, Sams321. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ashok Prasad Abhishek, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:04, 2 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Ashok Prasad Abhishek edit

 

Hello, Sams321. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ashok Prasad Abhishek".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 04:26, 30 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Ritu Chauhan edit

  Hello, Sams321. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ritu Chauhan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:02, 30 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Acting Ka Bhoot for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Acting Ka Bhoot is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acting Ka Bhoot until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

—usernamekiran (talk) 07:03, 26 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Acting Ka Bhoot.jpeg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Acting Ka Bhoot.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:01, 5 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Pahalwan Saheb edit

 

The article Pahalwan Saheb has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article, authored by a blocked user, user:Sams321, who was barred for undisclosed paid editing, lacks citations from secondary or reliable sources to establish its notability, as required by Wp:GNG and Wp:NBook.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –Owais Al Qarni (talk) 21:18, 1 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:Pahalwan Saheb book.jpg edit

 

The file File:Pahalwan Saheb book.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

File just used for a now deleted, promotional article. Uploaded by a UPE editor. Unlikely to be used in the future.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Liz Read! Talk! 21:23, 8 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Pahalwan Saheb book.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Pahalwan Saheb book.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:35, 11 January 2024 (UTC)Reply