User talk:Samar/Archive4

Latest comment: 11 years ago by SarahStierch in topic WikiWomen's Collaborative

Talkback edit

 
Hello, Samar. You have new messages at Theopolisme's talk page.
Message added 19:54, 1 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

Theopolisme 19:54, 1 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Mansehra Rock Edicts edit

Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:03, 5 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of Banbhore edit

  Hello! Your submission of Banbhore at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Aboutmovies (talk) 07:21, 8 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Talkback edit

 
Hello, Samar. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Kavoshgar-5.
Message added 19:11, 8 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

The Bushranger One ping only 19:11, 8 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

DYK Nomination of Battle of Marilao River edit

The article Battle of Marilao River was not new. It was an old article created April 6, 2012. I expanded it two days ago by more than five times. Isn't that in the eligibility criteria that an old article with references be expanded five times to be DYK material?

Replied at your talkpage Samar Talk 12:52, 10 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
I have expanded it. Could you reassess the article? Arius1998 (talk) 13:05, 10 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Talkback edit

 
Hello, Samar. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Silver River (Florida).
Message added 20:50, 12 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

The Bushranger One ping only 20:50, 12 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of Biosphere reserves of Pakistan edit

  Hello! Your submission of Biosphere reserves of Pakistan at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 21:33, 12 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Will add other reserves not recognized by UNESCO. Do you have other sources? My search usually comes up with other protected areas or Lal Suhanra. Samar Talk 07:02, 13 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
This document of UNESCO says Indus delta was expected to be nominated in 2001. Its bad, I couldn't find further sources for any other potential site, though we do have many in our country. --SMS Talk 20:11, 13 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for September 13 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Biosphere reserves of Pakistan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kohistan District (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 13 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your Credo account access has been sent to your email! edit

All editors who were approved for a Credo account and filled out the survey giving their username and email address were emailed Credo account access information. Please check your email.

  • If you didn't receive an email, or didn't fill out the survey, please email me at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com
  • If you tried out Credo and no longer want access, email me at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com

If you have any other questions, feel free to contact me. I hope you enjoy your account! User:Ocaasi 15:38, 13 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I need yor help at Template:Did you know nominations/First Families of Pakistan. I counldn't find a specific reference for this. Zia Khan 02:02, 14 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

I am not sure about the hook, Jinnah is the founder of Pakistan but Jinnah family is not the founder family. Out of his family, only his sister Fatima participated actively in politics. Maybe you should change the hook. Samar Talk 06:26, 14 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
Your comment/suggestion at the nomination page can help me. Zia Khan 06:17, 15 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
Brain blocked. Can't think of any hook from the entire article. Samar Talk 16:14, 15 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of Jubho Lagoon edit

  Hello! Your submission of Jubho Lagoon at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Redtigerxyz Talk 11:27, 16 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Biosphere reserves of Pakistan edit

The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Banbhore edit

The DYK project (nominate) 08:02, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you! edit

  Pakistan Barnstar of National Merit
For your efforts to build quality articles on Pakistan. As you may know Pakistani articles are generally of very poor quality, so it makes your edits even more valuable. Keep up the tremendous work and may we see more good articles on cities and towns and ancient sites and protected areas in Pakistan. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:30, 17 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
Thanks a lot Dr. :) Samar Talk 08:37, 17 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Mail edit

Replied. TheSpecialUser TSU 17:38, 17 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Checked. TheSpecialUser TSU 18:36, 17 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Jiwani Coastal Wetland edit

Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:03, 18 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for September 20 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of dams and reservoirs in Pakistan, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Hangu and Hazara (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 20 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Balochistan, Pakistan edit

Hi, Samar, I'm beginning the copy-edit you requested to the above article at the GOCE requests page. Please feel free to contact me, or to correct or revert my edits if I'm doing something I shouldn't. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 01:22, 22 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi again, I'm declaring the copy-edit done - I've marked several areas as unreferenced or in need for further references, and added an additional ref. Feel free to contact me about any issues arising from the copy-edit, and thanks again for the coffee. :-) Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 04:42, 24 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Jubho Lagoon edit

The DYK project (nominate) 16:02, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Red links edit

Hey, no worries about the restoring of content. Though I do think you should maybe read Wikipedia:Red link. Red links can help to improve the encyclopedia by encouraging people to write articles about notable topics. I assumed that the governmental bodies mentioned in the article are notable but have not yet had articles written about them. Cheers Delsion23 (talk) 19:41, 22 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Tomb of Bibi Jawindi edit

The DYK project (nominate) 08:02, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Shri Laxmi Narayan Mandir edit

Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:02, 24 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Template:Protected areas of Pakistan edit

While I appreciate how you've given Template:Protected areas of Pakistan a new look, don't you think it would be better to leave the red links in the template? That way, others can create articles on them. Removing the links does not help with identifying missing articles (unless you go through the template's history). Same goes for Template:Dams in Pakistan, I believe this version was better since it listed all dams in the country which is what a dams template should do. Red links are not necessarily a bad thing. Mar4d (talk) 15:39, 26 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

PS. By the way, your work on geography-related articles is just awesome. The amount of effort put into this article is amazing. I'm very impressed. Mar4d (talk) 15:41, 26 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
Needless to say I dislike the look of redlinks, puts me off. I felt missing articles can be identified from the main article and inducted in the template when created. But that is my view and I did not consider the article creation aspect. I wouldn't argue if you add the redlinks again. But there were too many and were overwhelming the navigation template. If you have time we can create a stub on each? Samar Talk 16:16, 26 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
I understand. I'm not a big fan of red links either, but at the end of the day, it is just demonstrative of an inherent flaw of Wikipedia: that this encyclopedia is a work in progress ;) And the best way to counter that flaw is to work on it by creating such articles. I had not noticed before that those missing articles are listed in their respective main articles - that is fine actually, as long as there's a list of them somewhere, it's all good because these red links are what help in creating articles after all. I guess I'll let it go for now and the template can just stay as it is for the time being. As for your last question, depending on how much spare time I get, I can't promise much on stub creations at the moment :( I'll let you know if I do ever get on board. Meanwhile, good luck with all the work you're doing, I hope you continue it. Mar4d (talk) 16:51, 26 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for September 27 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of minerals of Pakistan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aquamarine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 27 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Independence Day of Pakistan edit

Peer review has been archived. Should we go for the FA nom (nominators being you and me)? TheSpecialUser TSU 13:54, 27 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

I am not very pleased with the peer review, not much activity there. And I was going through India's ID nom some time back, there were a few reservations. Maybe a direct request for general review from an uninvolved editor first and thorough checks and then nominate after a couple of days? Samar Talk 14:25, 27 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Pakistan: Tag & Assess 2012 edit

  The Silver Wiki
You are hereby given The Silver Wiki Award for assessing the second highest number of articles in the Tag & Assess 2012. Thanks for your tireless contribution! SMS Talk 17:12, 27 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Gemstones of Pakistan edit

Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:02, 30 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

WikiWomen's Collaborative edit

WikiWomen Unite!
Hi Samar! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative.

As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by:

Feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can participate!

Can't wait to have you involved! SarahStierch (talk) 03:07, 11 October 2012 (UTC)Reply